Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

The proposal has raised alarms for members of Congress and NASA safety advisers as the agency and SpaceX prepare to launch humans into orbit as early as this year. One watchdog group labeled load-and-go a “potential safety risk.”

...

It is a potential safety risk. That’s why there’s an escape system, and the capsule is on top of the stack. It’s a lot safer than the Shuttle.


5 posted on 05/06/2018 1:44:27 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Give a man a fish and he'll be a Democrat. Teach a man to fish and he'll be a responsible citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62
It’s a lot safer than the Shuttle.

The original shuttle design had pyrotechnics to separate the crew compartment from the bulk of the orbiter and parachute it safely to earth.

NASA management elected to remove the pyrotechnics and the parachutes.

In the challenger disaster, the crew compartment separated at the designed-in parting line, and the still living crew plummeted without the benefit of parachutes to a very hard impact with the ocean.

12 posted on 05/06/2018 2:05:58 PM PDT by null and void (Urban "food deserts," are caused by urban customers' "climate change" (H/T niteowl77))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

I’m not sure that escaping out of an engulfing fireball is worth the effort. Out of a “regular” fire down below, yes, but that’s not the likely outcome of a fuel-loading incident.


15 posted on 05/06/2018 2:30:01 PM PDT by steve86 (Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc O'Morgair (Latin form: Malachy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson