Posted on 04/30/2018 7:01:38 PM PDT by ransomnote
Yes, I remember the sign. In fact, I think I saw that pic again just within the last day or two.
I didn’t know about Nigeria. So interesting. These slimeballs have fake cover for everything. You can just about guarantee that if BH0 did something, there was an ulterior motive behind it, that it was a front for some other action.
Repeat”....... sQuash it.
ThankQ - good stuff
We hates it! Kindle is all autocorrect and I spend half my posting time overriding it... have not found a way to turn it off. WE HATES IT! Gollum . . . Gollum...
‘Deflect, project, reject, object’ - Hillary Rodman Clinton
Bookmark
We need a creative FReeQ to ‘adjust’ that graphic :-)
Sorry, this isn’t Q related...but it’s not chopped liver or lettuce either!
Someone asked, on the previous thread, about Hippa. I said if you think Hippa locks down your info, you are wrong. In some cases, Hippa makes getting your health AND WHATEVER ELSE INFORMATION YOU PUT ON THAT FORM easier. In some cases, warrants are not required. Here’s just one example.
In cases of national disaster, the Red Cross or another such agency can get your info.
When does the Privacy Rule allow covered entities to disclose protected health information to law enforcement officials?
Answer:
The Privacy Rule is balanced to protect an individual’s privacy while allowing important law enforcement functions to continue. The Rule permits covered entities to disclose protected health information (PHI) to law enforcement officials, without the individual’s written authorization, under specific circumstances summarized below. For a complete understanding of the conditions and requirements for these disclosures, please review the exact regulatory text at the citations provided. Disclosures for law enforcement purposes are permitted as follows:
...For certain other specialized governmental law enforcement purposes, such as:
To federal officials authorized to conduct intelligence, counter-intelligence, and other national security activities under the National Security Act (45 CFR 164.512(k)(2)) or to provide protective services to the President and others and conduct related investigations (45 CFR 164.512(k)(3));...
...or to rescind your right to possess a firearm. ...or a house. ...or a pair of shoes... (Serbsky Institute)
Yup!
The perps aren’t all at gitmo because none of them are ever going to gitmo- or any other jail for that matter.
somewhere in flyover country you can bet...
+!
OH Great Oracle, please tell us more!!
Yet another sickening ‘legislating from the bench’ ruling.
I am SO sick of these leftist judges providing means for these thugs to get off, scot-free.
Not sure this president is going to ignore our TWO TIERED justice system any longer. It really sprung up during Obama and Eric Holder. I think it can be unsprung.
My uneducated bet would be ISRAEL. Period. And any other blooming friendly ally in the region. These Special People wanted wealth and global power to bring the worker bees to heel and to produce their material desires.
Just calling it like I see it. All of this crime, corruption and treason has gone on WAY too long without punishment. I mean it was past the point of ridiculous over a year ago, and here we all sit desperately looking for any clues that there is justice in this country when we can all see that there isn’t.
Oh ye of little faith. Until Trump was elected I knew there would be no justice for all the evil people that have been in power for many, many years.
I honestly believe we have a chance now to right a good many of the wrongs that have been done in the name of greed and evil.
If you cannot have at least a little hope by now, I feel truly sorry for you and hope you come around to a more positive way of looking at things.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.