On the other hand, I've only read a single one of their suggested replacements, the "Earthsea" series.
The latter truly amazes me. It is the American Odyssey. Without having read it, your education is not just incomplete, but willfully abased.
I'm glad they had enough sense to not include Albert Schweitzer's two volume survey of "J.S. Bach".
If you haven't read it, you just may be a barn animal.
GQ is for sodomites with feces on their penises.
“Mark Twain was a racist. Just read Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. He was a man of his time, so let’s leave him there. We don’t need him. “
This shows that the writer is utterly uneducated and wretchedly ignorant of Twain.
And then we were treated to some little girl named Emily telling us “Catch 22 was an ok telling of some war experiences, but she prefers some book about some iraqi-American girl who joins the Army to be a translator.
Lame.
GQ always did mean “going queer”.
Abject cowards. So the Bible makes their list but the Koran doesn’t? One reason: they wouldn’t dare.
GQ has been actively promoting the homosexual, counterculture (anti-Western) agenda for decades.
You can safely disregard anything in its pages.
in the first place. Notoriety == publicity.
Do even libs go to Vogue for "men" for literary judgments?
That's what New York Review of Books is for.
I’ve read a fair number of books on the list including the Bible.
The most important—non religious—reason to read the Bible is the rich prose. More every sayings, proverbs, and turns of phrase, come from the Bible. An educated person should read the Bible to understand the context of that part of our culture.
And, you know, the stories are pretty good.
I loved Vonnegut. I even read it for fun.
Usually, people that recommend books on the internet are giving you bad advice.