Former Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, once dubbed 'most popular politician on earth' by US President Barack Obama, to turn himself in to police.
https://twitter.com/AP/status/982736060613562368?s=03
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kALs0ryZGc
1956 Version by Judy Garland
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsfXi5BKkNo
Ok, this is my story, (and I’m sticking to it):
Q posted:
April 8, 2018
Contact Window ok (imho) the window(s)blown out in the Trump Tower yesterday due to the fire...(946456)
Fly High (imho) 50th floor of the Trump Tower...(946546)
Chem Attack
Concidence? (imho) Syria was hit yesterday with another Chem attack... (947065)
SO, looking at this is this what Q MIGHT have been talking about???
Q’s latest post #1080
They are trying to start a war.
Deflection.
Public interest shift.
Pullout announcement.
Chem attack.
Coincidence?
These people are sick.
Q
On April 7, 2018 drop number 1065 Q says:
https://www.instagram.com/p/bu-nofzf6 /?hl=en&taken-by=ray.chandler->
The island.
Night [3]
Q
So IMHO this fire was started at ‘night’ and there were [3] in the kill box...
comments?
Q post #1081
POTUS NEVER telegraphs his moves.
Think logically.
Why did POTUS announce his intention to pull out of Syria? Moves and countermoves.
These people are STUPID (& SICK).
Q
This may bb covered somewhere here...when Q says, “Enjoy the show”, IMO PDJT must be intimately involved in these posts/drops... PDJT built entertaining shows so this is him communicating to us...he’s not Q, however, I think Q is a patriotic strategist and techie, perhaps a 4-, 3-star patriot general in PDJT’s inner circle...anyway, the enjoy the show line just hit me that way.
Luke Rosiak is all over the Awan story. A couple of these.
http:// dailycaller.com/2017/09/12/exclusive-dws-it-guy-was-banned-from-house-after-trying-to-hide-secret-server/
A secret server is behind law enforcement’s decision to ban a former IT aide to Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz from the House network.
Now-indicted former congressional IT aide Imran Awan allegedly routed data from numerous House Democrats to a secret server. Police grew suspicious and requested a copy of the server early this year, but they were provided with an elaborate falsified image designed to hide the massive violations. The falsified image is what ultimately triggered their ban from the House network Feb. 2, according to a senior House official with direct knowledge of the investigation.
The secret server was connected to the House Democratic Caucus, an organization chaired by then-Rep. Xavier Becerra. Police informed Becerra that the server was the subject of an investigation and requested a copy of it. Authorities considered the false image they received to be interference in a criminal investigation, the senior official said.
Data was also backed up to Dropbox in huge quantities, the official said. Congressional offices are prohibited from using Dropbox, so an unofficial account was used, meaning Awan could have still had access to the data even though he was banned from the congressional network.
http:// dailycaller.com/2018/01/16/house-report-concluded-pakistanis-made-unauthorized-access-to-congressional-servers/
House investigators concluded that Democratic IT aides made unauthorized access to congressional servers in 2016, allegedly accessing the data of members for whom they did not work, logging in as members of Congress themselves, and covering their tracks, according to a presentation summarizing the findings of a four-month internal probe.
Their behavior mirrored a “classic method for insiders to exfiltrate data from an organization,” and they continued even after orders to stop, the briefing materials allege. There are indications that numerous members’ data may have been secretly residing not on their designated servers, but instead aggregated onto one server, according to the briefing and other sources. Authorities said that the entire server was then physically stolen.
When acting on the findings, Democratic leadership appear to have misrepresented the issue to their own members as solely a matter of theft, a comparison of the investigators’ findings with Democrats’ recollections and a committee’s public statement shows, leading 44 Democrats to not conduct protective measures typically taken after a breach — including informing constituents whose personal information may have been exposed. (A list of the involved members is below.)
The presentation, written by the House’s Office of the Inspector General, reported under the bold heading “UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS” that “5 shared employee system administrators have collectively logged into 15 member offices and the Democratic Caucus although they were not employed by the offices they accessed.”