Q Anon: (3/22/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

we-go-all.com/# ^ | 3/22/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:

http://www.we-go-all.com/#

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3640719/posts?page=19#19

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

I think the following video provides a "big picture" view of why "the storm" is necessary.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

[Cboldt]

-- Beat me by 3 minutes! --

Pure luck. Was just going back pages on a single tab, the tab that usually stays on Trump twitter feed, and there was a 4 minute old tweet. Hmmm. HMMMMMM!!!! OMG! Post Post Post post-haste!!

This is a real CNN headline: John Bolton's mustache is more qualified to be national security adviser than he is

[bagster]

I don't think our man would "consider" vetoing if he didn't plan on doing it.

Flipping the DACA issue back on the Dums is BRILLIANT!!!!!!!

This guy is GOOD.

[generally]

It probably doesn’t matter at this point, because what good is money when you’re in prison.

I don’t think the super-rich waste $ on anyone who is useless to them. I think that in or out of prison, 0vomit’s usefulness is now severely limited.

[Mazey]

Thanks to all of you for the warning on the fake assange twitter account. I’ve just started to read Twitter, follow a few people, trump, and the like, and boy I got had.

I now know the difference between the two accounts. I am learning about this posting, and answering, and it’s is hard. I haven’t done it much over the years. I tell you, much easier to read and lurk.

So, I think I learned, double check first, post second.

[bagster]

Scoop FR and get this out on the forum. I didn’t see it there yet.

[generally]

Does Forbes give any hints on how 0vomit went from 0 to $2.9 billion in less than a year?

I need to get in on that mutual fund! /s

[Cboldt]

-- Shutdown is cool with me. --

Me too. I think this is just a noise tactic, myself, and he'll sign it later today. The press will be on the threat of veto all day long, and the immigration issue will be cited. Maybe that advances border wall and the end of chain migration, etc., but I think not, because unless the bill is not signed, there is only talk, no pressure.

I share your RKBA concern. Too few law breakers in this country. Should just ignore unjust law, see Gandhi. RKBA should be a practical issue, not a political one - although it is obvious that the federal government and many states are bound and determined to disarm the public, eventually.

[generally]

Great question.

Since when does 0vomit carry his own bags?

Have you EVER seen him carrying anything other than a golf club?

[defconw]

Could he EO out all the parts he does not like. I would imagine that he might actually read this piece of crap bill!

[stars & stripes forever]

[That was a very good link - enjoyed reading it.]

WILLIAM FEDERER’S American Minute should be mandatory reading for elementary, secondary, and college students.

[reformedliberal]

LIFTED MY SPIRITS, FOR SURE.

btw, lots of FReepers posting:’Don’t believe it.”

[greeneyes]

Anybody got a twitter account? Tell POTUS we agree and also the bill infringes on rights of poor senior citizens to own a gun for self defense.

[bagster]

I tell you, much easier to read and lurk.

Haha. Tell me about it. I didn't post regularly until about October of last year after having signed up and lurked since 1998. I shoulda started sooner. This is FUUUUUN!!!!

[TEXOKIE]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaslighting

Mind games

[Ambrosia]

LOL “Ovomit” I love it, first time I heard that one. I have been calling him O Drama... yours is funny!

[greeneyes]

Yep. I’m thinking I might just print it and frame it to give to my kids for their birthdays or something.

[bagster]

lots of FReepers posting:’Don’t believe it.”

Goot lawd! The negative Nancies are incorrigible.

Oh well. Reality is gonna hit 'em in their frowny faces sooner or later. In the meantime, I'm enjoying the show very much and putting my money on veto.

:)

p.s. I wonder how much Schumer and Pelosi gloating had to do with this (maybe) decision. Suckered the dems again, our Donald did.

[bagster]

I like Osucka. I invented it.

[generally]

Glad you like it. :-)

I’ve been calling him that for years and years. And BTW, that’s 0vomit with a ZERO, not an O.

In any normal situation I am NOT a name-caller. If I disagree with a normal person I will argue with facts and data, not emotion and name-calling and mockery. But 0vomit is not a normal person. I am using the left’s Alinsky tactics against them. Anyone who is that evil get no respect from me.

[Cboldt]

-- Could he EO out all the parts he does not like. I would imagine that he might actually read this piece of crap bill! --

"Signing statements" are used to declare interpretation of statutes. I doubt he reads it himself - budget bills are dense legalese. Staffers read it and provide summary for the president. Going by how the politicians describe the laws, I am certain that it is not uncommon for a staffer to compose a misleading summary. I expect Trump does a bit of "spot checking" and demanding explanation.

The sheer volume of legislation and regulation is such that it is literally impossible to read all of it - probably literally impossible to read 5% of it, if all you did was read full time.