[pcottraux]

This is part 9 of a series I've been teaching on archaeological evidence that supports the Bible. Covered the Dead Sea Scrolls this week. My voice was a little shaky due to feeling under the weather. If you enjoyed this, you can read more at my blog, depthsofpentecost.com. Thanks for watching!

[pcottraux]

Ping.

[rlmorel]

I think it is good where you have it!

[rlmorel]

Putting off what I was going to do, going to go put this on the big TV.

[georgiegirl]

Thank you for posting, listening (watching) it now. Good teacher.

[Shark24]

Watching now, good job. Thanks for posting.

[Wm F Buckley Republican]

Thank you.

[woweeitsme]

Thanks! I’ll catch this later!

[rlmorel]

pcottraux, that was great! Just finished watching it-I very much enjoyed that, not only as a history buff, but as someone on a journey to God.

I just watched “The Case for Christ” for the first time last week, so this is very timely for me. (I have to watch or listen, can’t read too well anymore)

I am going to check out your other work...thank you.

[Mount Athos]

Why no discussion of the Septuagint, very strange omission?

It was made before Christ, more than a 1000 years before the masoretic text was copied.

Importantly, Christ’s citations of the old testament are most often distinctly septuagint versions.

Particularly relevant to your talk, the dead sea scrolls agree with the septuagint much more often than the masoretic text.

Which makes it hard to readily dismiss the Septuagint i’d say.

There’s a typo in one of your slides that dates masoretic text to 1000 BC instead of AD, but I think it’s not a big deal because everyone can figure out what you meant.