To: kelly4c
Because he and Strac6 not only lack imagination, but they lack “bottom” e.g. they lack a sound grounding in fact, because anyone adding up the facts that all can see who will see would conclude that there is an awful lot afoot in this world beyond just ordinary everyday mischief.
To: AndyJackson; ransomnote
Post #741 + #742 + #743
>>350546 Chris Wallace looks clean as far as those descriptors used by Q are concerned. Looking into Matthews now
Feb 12 2018 07:47:57
>>350576 https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Wallace
You are not looking close enough.
Q
>>350504
Find the link.
Look around.
What does it signify?
Q
Feb 12 2018 07:44:24
>>350525
What are they sitting on?
Perfectly lined up?
Why?
Learn.
Q
I wonder why BHO is depicted sitting in a bush
Feb 12 2018 07:42:52
>>350504
Find the link.
Look around.
What does it signify?
Q
To: AndyJackson; kelly4c
Because he and Strac6 not only lack imagination, but they lack bottom e.g. they lack a sound grounding in fact, because anyone adding up the facts that all can see who will see would conclude that there is an awful lot afoot in this world beyond just ordinary everyday mischief. More to the point is they are attempting to make the case that circumstantial evidence can NEVER be believed, that only concrete evidence should be used, even it has been made impossible to be produced and that destructive act can be shown as part of the circumstantial case against those who destroyed the hard evidence. No matter how overwhelming the circumstantial the case, they want absolute proof.
1,006 posted on
02/12/2018 8:32:07 PM PST by
Swordmaker
(My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you racist, bigot!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson