With the undeniable brilliance between you two, I’m curious why you hopped over the thread on President Trump’s speech at Davos and prefer to do your two step routine here?
Surely there are more valuable threads where your insight would be lauded.
You believe yourselves to be clever and witty but seriously, you come off sounding like jr high kids.
Well, this is a Q thread...
Q disciples believe Q to be clever and witty but seriously, Q comes off sounding like jr high kids.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/956510880157585408.html
I’ve never self-rated on the cleverness scale, and I don’t consider myself particularly witty. I know my own IQ, though, and it is, as the French would say, très formidable.
I post on these threads bc I have done and continue to do in-depth Q research. I have repeatedly posted direct Q quotes that posters who are considered far more Q-knowledgeable than I have stated straight up do not exist. How is that not of value? Do you really want NOT to know what Q has said? Can you honestly say you prefer ignorance to facts?
Anyway, as I’ve posted several times, I believe in Q. It may be considered by some to be an unorthodox belief, but it’s belief. Unless Q is a religion, why would a shade of unorthodoxy be considered a sacrilege?