Skip to comments.Q Anon: Some housekeeping rules that will keep the place tidy
Posted on 01/20/2018 12:23:20 PM PST by ransomnote
click here to read article
Thanks for your good deed today.
While I wouldnt sit and hang out for long on the Wild West parts of the Internet where anything goes, I do respect freedom. Not for child porn or snuff films. But places where anything goes are the only places a deep state cant control info. Those evil or unseemly racist things are sort of proof of that.
Not saying FR should ever link to Wild West sites. Just saying that with total freedom there will be risks but we can get in and see what we need to see without the rest.
Thanks for the ping!
As for all the negative comments, if you don’t like what’s playing here, feel free to change the channel
My 2 cents - the cryptic nature of the Q messages may be to cover the sender or his position in DC.
FR needs to lead the charge.
I firmly believe that FR is the cutting edge of conservative and Holy thought in the WORLD today.
Jim and the admin mods know that.
HEY JIM AND MODS...let the dogs out.
Unleash us to do our best.
That said, I know you will because you always have.
Let the dogs out...WOOF, WOOF.
I guess they ought to nut up and say it and find out.
Sites like 4chan and 8chan are the inevitable result of true freedom of speech. Consequently, many of the posts there are offensive because some people have views that are offensive, and some posts there are said to be illegal (not that I go looking for proof of that).
Mr. Robinson has every right to restrict linking from his site to certain other sites that he has problems with. That’s easy enough to accept, and there is nothing to prevent individuals from going there on their own if that’s their choice.
That said, I don’t see any reason to ban reposting of Q’s 8chan posts (without links) or discussion of those posts at FR.
If Jim doesn’t agree, I’m sure he will weigh in on this matter.
I had looked at 4chan and 8chan for other reasons before all this Q stuff. I trust neither site.
4chan is a bunch of catsquirrels. “look here, not look there, no over that way, etc.”
“So no more Qanon on FR, huh?”
Qanon posts are catalogued on the site in OP’s post in an easy to view format. Use that site to link to a specific Q post.
The 4chan and 8chan sites are fine to visit, but they are most definitely classified as NSFW and I suspect thats the reason they don’t want them linked here since many browse FR from work.
If (I know, big if) Q is for real, then he is posting where there is less censorship. The Chans, by virtue of what is there, have less censorship.
Think of them like a forest. What could you find in an unincorporated wild forest? Beautiful birds, nests of animals, a nice family in their vacation cottage, the unibomber, college hikers, panthers, new tropical plants to create life saving medicine, poisonous snakes, hideouts for pedophiles, basically everything.
You cant just say I dont trust the forest. I mean, you cant trust sites like CNN or the New York Times. You cant trust anything in a blanket way these days. Research and use your own common sense, occams razor, etc.
Personally I wish FR hosted images. Because there are so many great graphics being put out by the patriots at 8chan. People have no idea. I can tell you that behind the scenes those patriots work Twitter like tireless soldiers. And the research they do on corruption is amazing. The pace is breakneck speed around the clock. Q is just the spark that keeps them all going no matter if Q is real or not. If you have not seen them in action then you are really missing something. An no I have never seen them talk about hacking anything either. That is not how the Q forum works.
It really takes a lot of time and effort to learn how to use 4chan. Those kids are up to their ass in alligators. Once you realize MOST of what is posted there are Soros Paid shills trying to disrupt and demoralize them you can begin to get a glimpse of them and really begin to get a feel for who they are but it aint easy.
Here is an example of post on the Q forum:
#ReleaseTheMemo was the work of talented HUMANS that the elite have considered “irredeemable” and worse for a long time now. We’re “We the People”. Good governments are accountable to us and we expect our government to be the best, corruption free government on earth.
And a special note for beloved colleagues in the MSM: your “independent experts” are full of sh*t. Start telling the truth or STFU when you don’t know the facts. We already have better journalism skills than most of you. And we haven’t forgotten that truth and ethics are vital. We also know the difference between presenting information and sloshing out propaganda.
If you aren’t embarrassed, you should be. You have become the real deplorables and you prove it most every time you publish or broadcast “stories” instead of factual NEWS. We don’t think your irredeemable, we pity you because you have forgotten that you are capable of doing worthy things well.
Sound the battle call. Beat the drums of war.
Let's be relevant again. I nominate Rooster for General.
Though ... let him who thinks he stands, take heed, lest he fall--behooves all of us.
And, we'd best be careful about avoiding rejoicing when our enemy falls--else we displease The Lord in so doing.
Though we do let out a hearty
Well put. We have observed similar phenomena. Though neither of us do FB much at all. We do Twitter, Reddit a little, etc.
Evidently the curmudgeonly Jr PooBah has trouble distinguishing a mistyping of FAQs for FAGs.
They sort of insist, however, that one learn their language OR read some of the better translators, interpreters, commentators.
Dustin Nemos is good. Dr Corsi is usually not too bad. There are others that are sharp and usually on top of all things Q-anon.
Bubblegummer is in over his head if he messes with you, Jocko.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.