Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Uranium One: AG Sessions Orders DOJ To Put FBI’s Evidence Under The Microscope
TownHall ^ | 12/21/2017 | Matt Vespa

Posted on 12/22/2017 2:42:50 PM PST by Signalman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: laplata

Statute of limitations? It was not that long ago was it? How long is the statute of limitations?


21 posted on 12/22/2017 3:18:01 PM PST by MNDude (God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Matt Vespa: Why, oh why, oh why did you use a completely worthless and altogether unneeded word as the first word in your article?

Really sorry to see that from a professional writer.


22 posted on 12/22/2017 3:23:45 PM PST by upchuck (President Trump is great because he actually runs something other than his mouth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Here we go and don’t forget about the FBI agent that had the gag order removed...


23 posted on 12/22/2017 3:26:27 PM PST by DAVEY CROCKETT (Thank you Free Republic. Thank you President Donald J Trump, Greatest election Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39
If they REALLY investigate the U-1 deal it’s goodnight Irene for ol’ Bob Mueller. He prrsonally honchoed that sucker to completion, including a trip to Moscow. (They all thought Hillary would win). She got several hundred million$ out of it. Surely ol’ Bob Mueller got million$, too.

Trump and Sessions knew everything about Uranium One before the election. Trump hired Rosenstein and Rosenstein appointed Mueller one day after Trump interviewed Mueller. While everybody was distracted by Mueller's leaks about going after Trump, Sessions and his DOJ inspector general (Horowitz) were quietly building their cases against the plotters.

24 posted on 12/22/2017 3:26:53 PM PST by Always A Marine ("I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
pdeta_Clintn66666
25 posted on 12/22/2017 3:27:05 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laplata

Exactly where are those statues of limitation posted? I didn’t know TREASON had a statue of limitation?


26 posted on 12/22/2017 3:28:11 PM PST by Ambrosia ( Independent Voter- Southern as grits...Not politically correct! Facts first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

27 posted on 12/22/2017 3:33:51 PM PST by Bonemaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
The Devil's Disciples

Nominating Comey to replace Mueller in the Rose Garden.

28 posted on 12/22/2017 3:34:18 PM PST by Liz (One side in this conflict has 8 Trillion bullets; the other side doesnt know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All
Thoughtful Americans are asking: we know the Clintons got a $145 million bribe payable to the Clinton Foundation, but how much did Russia actually pay the US for the uranium?

Anybody ever see a figure on that?

What happened to the cash for the actual uranium sale? Did that money go into OFA--Obama’s slush fund for revolution? Or maybe into some offshore accounts?......

Particularly interesting is that immediately after exiting the white House, the Obama's traveled far and wide in such a short time -- their itinerary included Indonesia, Bali, French Polynesia; all those out-of-the-way places w/ infamous offshore banks that have numbered accounts.

THIS WE KNOW: the conniving Clintons took uranium.....a national strategic US asset......and sold it for their personal gain.

That smells like the infamous Teapot Dome scandal. Law professor Jonathan Turley said the Clintons uranium scheme .... "could be criminal." Turley (or somebody) needs to address the Clinton criminality in this context.

=======================================

More egregiously (to me) is that the criminal Clintons used proprietary information----intel the govt uses to secure the safety and security of we, the people.....to carry out their criminal acts.

I consider it reprehensible that Secy Hillary routinely sent her itinerary to the Clinton Foundation, giving the Clintons govt info to plot their scams.

29 posted on 12/22/2017 3:36:16 PM PST by Liz (One side in this conflict has 8 Trillion bullets; the other side doesnt know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Signalman; Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; ...

p


30 posted on 12/22/2017 3:38:49 PM PST by bitt (The first to squeal gets the best deal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laplata

“I think you have the solution with a Special Prosecutor. The evidence to justify one is overwhelming.”

Bring back Fitzgerald...he did such a great job with Scooter.


31 posted on 12/22/2017 3:39:18 PM PST by Bonemaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

threaten her like they did to Flynn’s son...


32 posted on 12/22/2017 3:40:29 PM PST by bitt (The first to squeal gets the best deal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Very clever !!


33 posted on 12/22/2017 3:41:05 PM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

“Justice Department prosecutors have begun asking FBI agents to explain...”

To hell with “asking”—it should be “ordering”.


34 posted on 12/22/2017 3:56:53 PM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Sorry, I simply don’t believe the report from MSNBC’s reporter.

My guess is that it’s Fake News that Sessions is doing anything, other than trying to bury any chance of this getting investigated again, and what they found originally.

Sessions actually got into a shouting match with Jim Jordan last time he was asked about it in front of cameras.


35 posted on 12/22/2017 4:00:26 PM PST by Golden Eagle (Trump: "What the FBI has done is really, really disgraceful, and a lot of people are very angry.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
At least three of the coup plotters could go to prison over Uranium One, giving them a strong motive to attempt to depose Trump.

They all assumed HRC would become POTUS, and continue to hide all their crimes.

When Trump won, PANIC TIME!


36 posted on 12/22/2017 4:03:59 PM PST by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ambrosia

Exactly where are those statues of limitation posted? I didn’t know TREASON had a statue of limitation?

><

I said nothing about that. You need to ask the poster who I was responding to.


37 posted on 12/22/2017 4:14:28 PM PST by laplata (Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
My guess is that it’s Fake News that Sessions is doing anything, other than trying to bury any chance of this getting investigated again, and what they found originally. Sessions actually got into a shouting match with Jim Jordan last time he was asked about it in front of cameras.

I just reviewed the 5:34 minute exchange between Jordan and Sessions on YouTube and have a much different take on it. Sessions refused to answer whether or not DOJ is already investigating the Clinton emails or Uranium One, and that is the only correct answer for him to give. In time, we will look back on Sessions's evasive answers as a necessary smokescreen to buy his DOJ more time. Robert Mueller has been a successful diversion to keep the conspirators focused on Trump while the DOJ builds its cases against them.

38 posted on 12/22/2017 4:25:38 PM PST by Always A Marine ("I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Always A Marine
Sessions refused to answer whether or not DOJ is already investigating the Clinton emails or Uranium One, and that is the only correct answer for him to give.

No it's not. The Judiciary Committee rightfully wants to know why there was a special counsel appointed to investigate Trump, when there was no evidence of a crime but a few ragtag Democrats wanted it, but now the DOJ refuses to appoint one when the DOJ oversight committee is requesting it, and there is a greater possibility of a crime and cover up.

Robert Mueller has been a successful diversion to keep the conspirators focused on Trump while the DOJ builds its cases against them.

So you really believe this one MSNBC reporter is the only one who would be able to get this info, if Sessions had actually ordered it? And you think the appointment of a special counsel to investigate Trump was more deserving of an independent counsel, than an investigation of corruption in the DOJ itself is deserving of one?

39 posted on 12/22/2017 4:38:16 PM PST by Golden Eagle (Trump: "What the FBI has done is really, really disgraceful, and a lot of people are very angry.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MNDude; laplata; Ambrosia
Statute of limitations? It was not that long ago was it? How long is the statute of limitations?

The statute of limitations for most federal crimes is five (5) years, which means that charges must be filed within five years of the date of the alleged crime.

Some federal crimes have longer statutes of limitations, such as:
- Income tax - 6 years
- Major fraud against government - 7 years
- Arson, embezzlement, citizenship fraud - 10 years

There is no statute of limitations for these federal crimes:
- Crimes punishable by death (e.g. Murder, Espionage, Treason)
- Terrorism resulting in death or serious injury
- Sex crimes with a minor

40 posted on 12/22/2017 4:50:59 PM PST by Always A Marine ("I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson