Posted on 12/19/2017 7:46:06 AM PST by PJ-Comix
On the same day that net neutrality was repealed, a net neutrality obsessed reporter for the New York Daily News was arrested for going on a drunken rampage at a hospital. The New York Post published the details of sad saga yesterday in Daily News reporter arrested after drunken melee at hospital:
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
The standards that an ant could clear?
...life savings we’re lost, parents credit ratings plunged, itunes playlists self deleted and Cindy Lauper was made queen of the world.
“...Cindy Lauper was made queen of the world.”
What fresh Hell would THAT be?
Have these idiots ever stopped to think that..............uh, no they don’t ..................never mind..............
People (R & D) are so easily fooled by names. The “Affordable Care Act” had nothing to do with affordability, only with who pays the higher prices it created.
The “consumer protection” law was not about protecting consumers, but funneling money to liberal organizations (along with many other things that didn’t protect consumers).
And “Net Neutrality” has nothing to do with “neutrality”, but with the government regulating broadband in a variety of ways including content. And you can be sure the government will not be neutral in application. They could have used monopoly law to fix some of the problems they cited. Or come up with a 2015 set of regulations instead of adopting the old regulations. Or only adopted the 70 pages they said they’d enforce rather than an additional 230+ pages they claimed will be ignored (until the FCC or FEC decides to use them in the future).
Typical NY Daily News Trash. This zuckerman dirtbag needs to go broke.
I suspect the left wasn’t telling us the truth about their real reason for loving Net Neutrality: ‘control’...
The consumer protection law was not about protecting consumers, but funneling money to liberal organizations (along with many other things that didnt protect consumers).
And Net Neutrality has nothing to do with neutrality, but with the government regulating broadband in a variety of ways including content. And you can be sure the government will not be neutral in application. They could have used monopoly law to fix some of the problems they cited. Or come up with a 2015 set of regulations instead of adopting the old regulations. Or only adopted the 70 pages they said theyd enforce rather than an additional 230+ pages they claimed will be ignored (until the FCC or FEC decides to use them in the future).
Right on every point... net neutrality was about control... future control of content... a boot on the neck of free speech.
Net Neutrality was the only program of Obama’s that might of slipped under Trump’s radar, but didn’t. In 7 years, there will be no Obama Legacy worth remembering.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.