that still wouldn't make it true...I probably believed her story then. It was a nothingburger then and it is a nothingburger now.
Still wouldn’t make it true.
Anita Hill had a consensual tryst with Clarence Thomas.
When that didn’t turn out for Anita, in the way she wanted, the tryst later became unconsensual to her..
Thomas married a white woman, thats what really got Hill cranked.
Hill is an idiot.
Justice Thomas does not deserve any of this pu$$y whipping liberal fascist tripe. If Thomas was a democrat , this would never have been mentioned.
It’s not a matter of belief, it’s a matter of proof. So whether I believe it or not, doesn’t matter now any more than it did then. And to my knowledge, physical sexual harassment is a crime. I haven’t seen any massive arrests going on with this feeding frenzy. And that includes Franken who they even have pictures of his groping with the military member. How do you expect anyone to take you serious when the libs spent a number of years trying to play off Clinton’s lying about his acts by “pooh poohing” it as a tiny character flaw that should be ignored. And the literal overlooking of John Kennedy’s hookers he had in the white house and his sharing of Marilyn with his brother?
Believe you with nothing? Hell, they don’t care about the proven.
rwood
Nope. It was a lie then, and it’s still a lie.
Actually I think she’s right. In the age of sexual McCarthyism an accusation is a conviction. Depending, of course, on who the accused is and his politics.
No Snowflake. #1 He wasn’t a Democrat and #2 YOU are a Democrat, liberal shill. OK?
anita, you dishonest idiot, that is only because LIB “educators” have rotted the minds of millions to the point where they can think logically and can’t think critically.
Yeah, but I do miss that biddy who testified beside her.
“Senatore, Senatore, Secksual harassment is real, Senatore,...”
I forgot her name, but I remember her voice.
Numbers of people believing something is not a standard that qualifies something for truth. Truth that they believe it, yes. Truth that what they believe is true? No telling.
Oops! Except that you were exposed as a liar, Anitass!
Go away Anita
...Anita Hill spoke at an event in Beverly Hills, California on Friday...
I thought it was burning down?
That only reflects badly on the current electorate and the LSM drumbeat endlessly flogging your fabrication. In real life contemporaneous witness and circumstances showed you for the lying, devious, evil person you actually are.
that still wouldn't make it true... Notice she said "my story," and not "the truth."
Perhaps she is right. We do have a dumber population.
I watched the hearings. She was lying through her teeth to destroy an honorable man.
Sorry, Anita, but no.
I covered the case (for a very minor publication.) I have investigated. I know several people who worked with Thomas and Hill. All of them are aligned with Justice Thomas against her.
At least one senator publicly identified her story as perjury (and he had been a prosecutor.) My investigation showed that she was put up to it by aides in Ted Kennedy’s office.
As has been reported elsewhere, she made virtually the same allegations — down to the Coke can — against a prior employer. (I believe that it may well be true of the prior employer.)
So, no, the story wouldn’t be more believed today.