Posted on 11/21/2017 10:42:41 AM PST by rickmichaels
About a year ago, Milo Yiannopoulos described male feminists like this:
"These beta orbiting cucks proudly carry the feminist banner. But they look at the cause as their best hope to get laid. Why do you think so many male feminists turn out to be virgins, perverts or, even more often, both?"
And I think he’s right.
If you look at the men being outed as sexual predators lately, they all use the same defense.
Whether it’s Charlie Rose [since fired by CBS], Al Franken or Podesta lickspittle Glenn Thrush — they start by saying what strong supporters of women they are.
Speaking of Glenn Thrush. I think a good rule to live by is never be alone with a man named after a yeast infection.
Any old how.
In his statement tweeted out yesterday evening, Charlie Rose opened with this:
"In my 45 years of journalism, I have prided myself on being an advocate for the careers of the women with whom I have worked."
These guys always start by explaining just how supportive they are toward women.
But what was it Milo said? “They look at the cause as their best hope to get laid.”
And I think it’s safe to say that applies to Charlie.
One of Glenn Thrush’s targets told Vox this:
"He kept saying he’s an advocate for women and women journalists,” a 23-year-old woman told me, recounting an incident with Thrush from this past June. “That’s how he presented himself to me. He tried to make himself seem like an ally and a mentor."
But of course he did.
It’s no wonder that most Leftist woman think all men are sexual predators.
If the only guys you permit in your hyper-sensitive bubble are male feminists, what do you expect?
“I’m a strong advocate for women’s rights” has become the new “Do you want to come up to my place and see the view?”
My personal experience is that the men who aren’t – excuse the expression – pussy-whipped by third-wave feminists are the ones who are extremely respectful of women.
With one exception, every man in my life has been able to keep his hands to himself.
Sadly, the one exception was your typical male feminist.
Even sadder still, he’s the guy I married.
Hey, I was young! I fell for the whole “I’m a sensitive male who respects women” line.
It was only after we were married that I discovered his “strong support for women” always included trying to get them into bed.
Which may explain why we were separated eighteen months later and divorced on our third anniversary.
I might have been young, but I still had a hair-trigger when it came to assholes.
Milo is right. Feminism is a cancer. And when it afflicts men, the first thing it does is destroy a guy’s ability to keep his hands to himself.
Male feminists’ respect for women does not include respecting boundaries.
But I’m not surprised they think being “a strong advocate for women” would translate into an all-excess-pass to a woman’s body.
After all, when Bill Clinton was embroiled in the Monica Lewinsky scandal, Time magazine’s Nina Burleigh said that she would give Clinton a blow job just to thank him for keeping abortion legal.
In a way, I blame feminists for turning Liberal men into sexual predators.
I think it’s a completely logical side-effect to jettisoning the culture in which men showed respect and honor toward women.
When you no longer have to respect and honor women, anything goes.
But the men who resist this feminist-driven cultural upheaval are the ones who don’t act like predators. Have you noticed that?
And here’s the irony. Those men are the ones third-wave feminists describe as suffering from “toxic masculinity.”
But how toxic can it be if it keeps men from acting like predators?
In fact, it seems to me that masculinity isn’t what’s toxic for men.
Instead, Feminism is.
Author is Dianny, not Milo. My mistake.
Thinking all men are predators DEFINES Leftist, frumpy, frigid, neurotic women.
As far as anyone knows, you're still wearing them.
Back when I was young, single and stupid I was well aware the lib chicks were the easy ones. So I kept my political views to myself, mostly.
Not surprised at all.
But, I don’t have any problem with virgins. That’s another sign of a sick society - making fun of virgins. It’s a good thing, not bad.
Does this require the obligatory post of liberal women photos?
A deep problem is the separation between sex and procreation, which feminists insist on with their claim to a right to kill babies between conception and birth, and which means that they will only draw men who accept that and therefor sign on to a cheapened view of themselves and of the women they are with.
An excess of access?
Feminism is a symptom of the spiritual problem.
YEP, LIBERAL ELITE PREDATORS all support 'women health' which does NOT mean 'more research' on breast cancer...
NOPE. HERE'S WHAT IT MEANS:
"Women's Health" means 'KILL THE BABY - IT MEANS LEGAL AND CHEAP ABORTIONS'...It's means 'provide cover for liberal elites' exploitation and abuse of young women - KILL THE BABY...
Thanks for correcting that, as I was way confused.
You know, that all makes total sense. The Beta males just aren’t strong enough to win over a normal woman. Therefore, they assume the weak, “Hey, I’m on your side” role in a very unnatural way as their primary, or only, way to try and win over a girl.
Looking back, it all falls into place. Ninety-nine percent of the feminist males you see or encounter are the weaker of the brotherhood.
It’s true.
I almost dated a liberal woman once (before I got to know her politics), but when I asked her out she went on and on about how I was scaring her, and how she wasn’t ready, and blah blah blah.
So I decided, “K, bye.” And literally within 30 seconds of me declaring that I wasn’t interested anymore, she completely turned around and started getting upset that I was no longer interested.
Fascinating how standing up for yourself can attract even crazy feminist women like that, unlike the beta cucks on the left-wing side.
Because they stay in their bubble with perverted Leftist men?
“Author is Dianny, not Milo. My mistake.”
There you go, not respecting a woman’s mind. Just kidding.
Abortion as a means to cover up Leftis men’s abuse and rape? Now, it makes perfect sense. It covers all the bases.
Harvey Weinstein doesn't care about ovarian cancer ... or breast cancer for that matter. He cares about killing any possible offspring that might mess with his fun ... or marriage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.