Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google isn't saying Microsoft security sucks but Chrome for Windows has its own antivirus
The Register ^ | Oct 16, 2017 | Thomas Claburn

Posted on 10/16/2017 9:29:03 PM PDT by dayglored

In its ongoing effort to improve browser security, school Microsoft on security, and retain its search audience, Google is today rolling out several Chrome for Windows fortifications.

The search biz has modded Chrome for Windows to detect when extensions switch people's Chrome settings, such as the default search engine, without authorization, a common tactic for deceptive software. The browser will now ask whether it can restore previous settings, which for the majority of Windows users will reestablish Google as Chrome's default search engine.

The operation can also be done by visiting a reset URL:
chrome://settings/resetProfileSettings

What's more, Google has enlisted security biz ESET to rebuild its Chrome Cleanup engine for removing deceptive code. In effect, the browser is getting built-in basic antivirus protection for your Windows computer.

"Our engine scans for and cleans potentially harmful applications, specifically the types that negatively impact or target the Chrome browsing experience," said Juraj Malcho, chief technology officer at ESET, in an email to The Register. "It is not meant to provide full coverage against all modern threats, its capabilities are limited to detecting specific malware families and/or specific ways of tampering with Chrome or operating system."

Chrome Cleanup began life in 2014 as Software Removal Tool, a sort of factory reset for Google's browser. Referred to as both Chrome Cleanup Tool and Chrome Cleanup, it has evolved into a way for Windows users to undo the damage from "unwanted software," the neutered term Google uses for malware.

"Unwanted software" emphasizes desirability, or lack thereof, rather than responsibility. The web giant takes a similar tack by referring to ad fraud as "invalid clicks." It also uses the defanged phrase "potentially harmful apps," or PHAs, in lieu of something stronger.

In its Android Security 2016 Year in Review report, Google said it employs the term "unwanted software" as "a way to deal with applications that are not strictly considered malware, but are generally harmful to the software ecosystem."

For what it's worth, Chrome, by default, automatically tries to stop software nasties from being accidentally downloaded onto a machine, by checking website URLs against lists of known dangerous and unsafe sites. If you surf to a website known for distributing malware, er, unwanted software, a big red warning will appear in the browser urging you to stop and go back the way you came.

However, this kind of prevention isn't perfect, because new evil sites pop up all the time and may not be on the blacklist immediately, and so now Chrome has its own proper builtin antivirus for catching and removing particular types of malicious code, if that code manages to run on a machine.

And here's why Google opts for "unwanted software" rather than "malware." To avoid any arguments or court battles over accusations of wrongdoing, rather than label a dodgy application as "malware," Google opts for no-fault removals, without apology, blame or recompense. It's not removing illegal or deliberately malicious software from your computer, it's removing unwanted software.

Semantics aside, the tweaked Chrome Cleanup sports a revised interface for more clearly communicating what will be removed. It's also, Google insisted, capable of removing "more unwanted software than ever before," which isn't a particularly clear metric.

Malcho said ESET's engine doesn't monitor the system all the time, but instead runs scans periodically with a focus on remediation – restoring the settings to a known good state.

"The speed of the scan and minimal performance impact are crucial," Malcho said. "Hence only the most necessary parts of the scanning engine are included, resulting in a pretty tiny product. Also, only selected parts of OS are being scanned as compared to full a blown security solution."

Nonetheless, it's a useful expansion of Google initiatives like Safe Browsing to muck the stalls of the web. Google also stresses that it is not supposed to replace Windows Defender or whatever antivirus tools you have on your system. "Note this new sandboxed engine is not a general-purpose antivirus — it only removes software that doesn’t comply with our unwanted software policy," the ads giant said.

A Google spokesperson told The Register via email: "All Canary and Dev Chrome for Windows users should have the new Chrome Cleanup features. Those on Beta and Stable will receive later this week. These features are not tied to our regular Chrome release schedule and users with Chrome 61 and higher will receive the new features."

This comes after Google researchers have, over the years, pointed out various flaws in Microsoft's programming – from bugs in the Windows kernel to cockups in the operating system's bundled antivirus engine. ®


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; Hobbies
KEYWORDS: chrome; google; windows; windowspinglist
Interesting...
1 posted on 10/16/2017 9:29:03 PM PDT by dayglored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Abby4116; afraidfortherepublic; aft_lizard; AF_Blue; amigatec; AppyPappy; arnoldc1; ATOMIC_PUNK; ...
Google improves on Windows security... hmmm ... PING!

You can find all the Windows Ping list threads with FR search: just search on keyword "windowspinglist".

2 posted on 10/16/2017 9:29:49 PM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

I despise Google. And now I am required to use it at work. I hate it with a white-hot burning passion.


3 posted on 10/16/2017 9:30:39 PM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals: American Liberty is the egg that requires breaking to make their Utopian omelette.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

Oh, yes. Of course. Google is our friend and wants us to be secure in our online identity, data and relationships.

I don’t believe this for a second.


4 posted on 10/16/2017 9:31:27 PM PDT by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

Data Mining 2.0

or

just America-hating at its finest.

I truly hate Chrome.


5 posted on 10/16/2017 9:34:52 PM PDT by txnativegop (The political left, Mankinds intellectual hemlock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

You are not the only one.


6 posted on 10/16/2017 9:37:03 PM PDT by Fungi (90 percent of all soil biomass is a fungus. Fungi rule the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

Well, it’s google, so I’ll pass.


7 posted on 10/16/2017 9:41:04 PM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celerity
> I don’t believe this for a second.

O ye of little faith! :-)

8 posted on 10/16/2017 9:52:18 PM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

Yeah, and Kim Philby also badmouthed Guy Burgess all the time.


9 posted on 10/16/2017 9:52:36 PM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Good to know, since that’s what I use. Thanks dayglored.


10 posted on 10/16/2017 10:21:01 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fungi
Ironic. I have always had an issue with their gathering of personal data, it seemed like the change in information gathering from prior practices was like building cars pre-Henry Ford to post assembly line.

And I hate their millennial style political correctness, with their daily Google banner, a world-wide form of virtue signalling/political correctness/social justice warrior activism that celebrates people and things that are hostile to America. I haven't seen Lenin, Stalin, Mao, or Che Guevara yet, but I will bet money they would feature them if they thought they could get away with it.

But those things aren't even my main point of disgust with them.

It is their manipulation of search results that really gets my ire up. There is, to me, a deeply disturbing and sinister aspect to that. It is an established fact that Google manipulates things, and this seems a precursor to a modern version of Orwell's "Memory Hole", just far, FAR easier to implement.

And now, I have to look at it every single day.

You know what I despise and detest, an otherwise small thing in a corporate world that really somehow bugs me? It is this:

I know I am getting to be a grouchy codger. I embrace that. Therefore, that "Wooohoo" just makes me grit my teeth. And I have to see it all day, every day.

When I say "Wooohooo" I am either jumping out of a plane or drinking tequila after licking salt and sucking a lemon slice, not when I am dealing with a serious issue. It just bugs me.

I will survive, but man, do I hate Google.

11 posted on 10/17/2017 4:49:12 AM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals: American Liberty is the egg that requires breaking to make their Utopian omelette.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
HA...should read after the red arrow....WOOHOO...GOOGLE has read all the messages in your inbox!
12 posted on 10/17/2017 6:59:22 AM PDT by goodnesswins (As Americans, We are CITIZENS not SUBJECTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

Well...yeah...they are all about gathering information of all kinds, so if they were able to access content...well, there it is. I am sure they would solemnly swear they don’t or can’t access the information, but...I will bet they can. Creeps me out. And to see them partnering with government in any way, shape, or form, is doubly disturbing to me.

It just strikes me differently than say, Microsoft or Apple. Both of those companies are primarily into hardware, software, or both.

Google is primarily into the trafficking and mining of data and information. Personal and corporate data and information.


13 posted on 10/17/2017 7:40:06 AM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals: American Liberty is the egg that requires breaking to make their Utopian omelette.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

” I hate Google”

Then don’t use it. No need to use their online version.

Get something like Thunderbird instead. It’s a mail client that can connect to google just fine.


14 posted on 10/17/2017 7:54:37 AM PDT by CodeToad (CWII is coming. Arm Up! They Are!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
"so if they were able to access content"

IF? I always have thought they do.

15 posted on 10/17/2017 8:08:48 AM PDT by goodnesswins (As Americans, We are CITIZENS not SUBJECTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

I have to use it for work. Our entire facility has switched to Google Mail and Google Apps.

If it was my personal life, sure. I have been trying out various search engines for the last year or so...


16 posted on 10/17/2017 9:27:51 AM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals: American Liberty is the egg that requires breaking to make their Utopian omelette.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson