Kurt Eichenwald had a predictive "climate change equation"

Twitter ^ | 5 Sep 2017 | Kurt Eichenwald

[scripter]

I like this guys approach:

The Climate Science Challenge

[a fool in paradise]

So he was 100% right about Harvey the week before as well? If not, why not?

#iScienceAndForesooth

[RightGeek]

He should go back to doing porn research - http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/media-fawn-over-kurt-eichenwald-overlook-sordid-past-involving-child-porn-site-expose

[Tenacious 1]

Questions for The Religious MMCC Faithful.... If not for human beings.....

1. What is the perfect average global temperature for this planet?

2. Should it be expected to remain constant? If so, for how long? (Geological History proves not constant)

3. If not influenced by humans, should the average global temperature be going up or down? By how much over what period of time?

4. If all questions above are answered, you have a “Scientific Control” on which to base or validate a variable result or observation. Therefore, what delta has human beings influenced from the control?

WHAT? You can’t answer these very basic scientific questions? You mean you only have a theory? What then is the hypothesis again? If Humans do what, then you hypothesize a result of what? How exactly do we “cool” this planet? What experiment has been conducted that can produce repeatable and empirical results to prove a solution to the problem?

Wait! What scientific experiment was done to prove the cause of the problem? You know, that a .01% change in CO2 to a given volume of air heats said air to a measurable degree? We haven’t done that experiment yet?

[a fool in paradise]

And remember! Future events such as these will affect us in the FUTURE!

[Tenacious 1]

I predicts Enchante will post the same thing THREE TIMES!!!

Oooh! Your good. You should apply for a government grant. You have a unique gift for predicting the past. LOL!

[dead]

I am not a sponge diver, but using oatmeal and a concuburted elliptical, I predicted Moe Howard University's recent victory over UNLV of Ohio with a 700% diabolical accuracy skirt of over 74 amperes from an upward facing teslian meter on a downward facing dogwood sandwich.

[a fool in paradise]

[dead]

My dad has a barn, and my mother has some old curtains, and me and my friends put on a play of Hamelet that was even betterer than the one with the guy from X-Men when he was smaller and on Broadway in London!
- Kurt Eichenwald

[ExNewsExSpook]

I think the thread has since been pulled, but after Eichenwald posted his little prediction, he was absolutely savaged by Ryan Maue (climatology PhD at Cato), Joe Bastardi and other hurricane scientists. It was easily the thread of the day on twitter—if you didn’t see it, hopefully it still exists somewhere. Suffice it to say, Eichenwald was b***h-slapped at the Category V level.

Couldn’t happen to a more deserving guy, too. At this point, the only person who takes Eichenwald seriously is...Kurt Eichenwald.

[Mr.Unique]

Looks like it the main tweet from Eichenwald has been deleted.

I started following Maue after reading it earlier.

[FredZarguna]

https://twitter.com/kurteichenwald/status/905123560829702150M

Meme reply from a physicist gone bad and current FReeper, which I can tweet but not post here is on that rather hilarious thread.

[henkster]

We have a historical record of climate change and its effects on civilization.

1. Roman Warm Period, from about the birth of Christ to about 350 A. D.. The world was warmer than it is now. Civilization flourished in northern latitudes in places like Gaul and Roman Britain where civilization had not previously existed. It was a period of relative prosperity, peace, and culture.

2. As the Roman Warm Period ended and the earth cooled, the climatic change cause nomadic Central Asian tribes to push into Central Europe, which in turn caused Germanic tribes to pour over the Roman frontier, and eventually bring about the end of the Western Empire. The cold period that followed was the nadir of Western Civilization, known as “The Dark Ages.”

3. Starting around 900 A. D., the climate warmed again during the Medieval Warm Period. This was the time Vikings settled and raised cattle in Greenland (which is not done today because it’s too cold). Civilization flourished in what was called the High Middle Ages; universities were founded, cloth halls and great cathedrals were built.

4. The climate turned cold again. The ice advanced in Greenland and ended the Viking settlements. The colder climate in Western Europe reduced crop yields, so that food was no longer abundant for the expanded population. The lack of nutrition and colder, wetter climate made the population susceptible to disease, which soon appeared in the form of “The Black Death.”

So in addition to not knowing the “correct” temperature of the earth, the climate change charlatans ignore the basic lesson of history:

Warm = prosperity = good

Cold = Dark Ages = bad

This is why one of the IPCC emails blatantly stateed “we have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.”

[Billthedrill]

BTT. I saw that equation and was scratching my head wondering, “And you got track data from that...how?”

[Chode]

yeah, right...

[Mr.Unique]

I see. Lots of buffoons commenting.

[FredZarguna]

Kurt thought he'd prove that Conservatives don't get math and science, and instead wound up proving that all of the bafflegab liberals cite about their "sophistication," amounts to nothing more than "because science."

The guy is a complete fool, and a pervert to boot.

[KosmicKitty]

Which child prostitute that he was caught paying did he include in his model.

Of course, climate models don’t include weather - so he is a complete idiot.