Skip to comments.
Oregon Governor Signs Gun Confiscation Law, Violates 2nd and 14th Amendments
World News Politics ^
| 8/23/2017
| M.L.
Posted on 08/26/2017 2:56:33 PM PDT by Beave Meister
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Unconstitutional....but that never stopped liberals before.
To: Beave Meister
Oregon voters voted these people in because they were kind, progressive and had such good intentions. If this Governor were running right now 99.999999% of every leftist that voted for she/it would still cast their vote the same way.
“It’s for the children!” they’d cry; “We want to abort them.”
Leftist are like that.
2
posted on
08/26/2017 3:01:32 PM PDT
by
Fai Mao
(I still want to see The PIAPS in prison)
To: Beave Meister
If you dont consent, they will force you into a road block around a blind corner and murder you in the snow.
The choice is your, Oregon.
3
posted on
08/26/2017 3:01:48 PM PDT
by
Delta 21
(AntiFa and BLM should be on the United States list of Terrorist Organizations)
To: Beave Meister
4
posted on
08/26/2017 3:03:30 PM PDT
by
Electric Graffiti
(Obama voters killed America. Treat them accordingly.)
To: Beave Meister
The law only applies to individuals deemed an imminent danger either to themselves or to others; evidence is required for a judge to make the ruling, which can be appealed.
Please note imminent harm to self or others. The same standard as having someone involuntarily committed.
5
posted on
08/26/2017 3:04:06 PM PDT
by
pharmacopeia
(All will be well and all will be well and every kind of thing shall be well. (Julian of Norwic)
To: Beave Meister
And that giant sucking sound you hear is every taxpaying, productive citizen fleeing Oregon for Nashville TN. Come on, y’all! Bring ya guns, too!
6
posted on
08/26/2017 3:08:16 PM PDT
by
Tonytitan
(I)
To: pharmacopeia
“which can be appealed”
Lol, the judiciary is totally corrupt—Controlled by leftists
“The law only applies to individuals deemed an imminent danger either to themselves or to others”
IOW...Whatever the elites deem to be a danger...White males that voted for Trump
IBTZ
7
posted on
08/26/2017 3:09:21 PM PDT
by
Electric Graffiti
(Obama voters killed America. Treat them accordingly.)
To: Electric Graffiti
If it’s zot worthy then so be it. But the actual text of the law doesn’t seem to accord with the vague but threatening alarmism of this poorly written and un-sourced article.
8
posted on
08/26/2017 3:13:17 PM PDT
by
pharmacopeia
(All will be well and all will be well and every kind of thing shall be well. (Julian of Norwic)
To: pharmacopeia
Please note imminent harm to self or others. The same standard as having someone involuntarily committed.And in other news...
Florida Suicide Prevention
Coming to a state near you!
9
posted on
08/26/2017 3:17:44 PM PDT
by
Tonytitan
(I)
To: Beave Meister
Great! Now send them to Chicago.
10
posted on
08/26/2017 3:18:11 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
(There Are Three Great Ways To Perfect Landings - Unfortunately We Pilots Don't Know Them.)
To: pharmacopeia
"The law only applies to individuals deemed an imminent danger either to themselves or to others; evidence is required for a judge to make the ruling, which can be appealed."
Head-In-The-Sand Post Alert!
11
posted on
08/26/2017 3:19:10 PM PDT
by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
To: pharmacopeia
If you can’t see that as a danger, then you’re mentally ill or a troll...probably both.
12
posted on
08/26/2017 3:19:23 PM PDT
by
Electric Graffiti
(Obama voters killed America. Treat them accordingly.)
To: pharmacopeia
Still here, nubeetroll?
Here, kitty, Kitty, Kitties!
13
posted on
08/26/2017 3:26:50 PM PDT
by
TXnMA
(Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Treat George P. Bush like Santa Ana at San Jacinto!!!)
To: Beave Meister
I wonder how long it will be before there’s a lawsuit over this.
14
posted on
08/26/2017 3:32:22 PM PDT
by
Mafe
To: Beave Meister
How many citizens do these unamerican political hacks really think will comply with such a patently illegal “law?”
15
posted on
08/26/2017 3:33:03 PM PDT
by
faithhopecharity
("Politicans are not born, they're excreted." -- Marcus Tillius Cicero)
To: pharmacopeia
“Shall not be infringed.”
16
posted on
08/26/2017 3:37:17 PM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(The Democrats ... have lost their grip on reality -DJT)
To: Beave Meister
You should read the actual law. It is far different that what is portrayed here. It only applies to those considered a risk to themselves or others. Only law enforcement officials, not all government officials, and family members can ask for the removal of the firearms. Only after a court hearing does the individual have to give up his guns. Read the law before making knee jerk reactions.
17
posted on
08/26/2017 3:42:04 PM PDT
by
DugwayDuke
("A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest")
To: pharmacopeia
Have you ever tried to retrieve a gun from a LE organization, even with a court order?
18
posted on
08/26/2017 3:42:11 PM PDT
by
mad_as_he$$
(Not my circus. Not my monkeys.)
To: Tonytitan
No and No. I am going to retire there.
If you own a hunting rifle and decent pistol I will make an exception.
19
posted on
08/26/2017 3:43:51 PM PDT
by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west))
To: Electric Graffiti; Chode; All
IOW...Whatever the elites deem to be a danger...White males that voted for TrumpJust like the Nazi's and Stalin...
20
posted on
08/26/2017 3:46:41 PM PDT
by
mabarker1
(Progress- the opposite of congress)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson