Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: ProgressingAmerica
Whiny Little B!tches???
28 posted on
08/20/2017 3:39:51 PM PDT by
Chode
(You have all of the resources you are going to have. Abandon your illusions and plan accordingly.)
To: ProgressingAmerica
Postmodernists would be accurate.
Or
The AntiAmericans
Or
The WhiteHaters
29 posted on
08/20/2017 3:42:51 PM PDT by
aquila48
To: ProgressingAmerica
31 posted on
08/20/2017 3:48:35 PM PDT by
Old Yeller
(Auto-correct has become my worst enema.)
To: ProgressingAmerica
Those mindless minions of media should proudly call themselves "The Bag o' Glass Party".
"We're just packaging what the kids want!
32 posted on
08/20/2017 3:51:36 PM PDT by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
To: ProgressingAmerica
To: ProgressingAmerica
We (Progressives) are: WHO ARE
Hebrew: a-nakh-nu lihyot
34 posted on
08/20/2017 4:09:04 PM PDT by
jobim
To: ProgressingAmerica
It doesn’t matter what word they choose - in time the word will become unacceptable... Why? Because their ideas are unacceptable and after a while the word will be associated with them... Then on to a new name... and another and another...
36 posted on
08/20/2017 4:21:40 PM PDT by
GOPJ
(Start by tearing down statues ...burning books, and eventually you go after people - John Davidson)
To: ProgressingAmerica
Commiemania! Not real communism but an incredible simulation.
To: ProgressingAmerica
Communists, if they were being honest.
38 posted on
08/20/2017 4:25:38 PM PDT by
WMarshal
(President Trump, a president keeping his promises to the American people. It feels like winning.)
To: ProgressingAmerica
41 posted on
08/20/2017 4:27:58 PM PDT by
Lionheartusa1
()-: the left has become a black hole in space and time :-()
To: ProgressingAmerica
42 posted on
08/20/2017 4:33:16 PM PDT by
johnthebaptistmoore
(The world continues to be stuck in a "all leftist, all of the time" funk. BUNK THE FUNK!)
To: ProgressingAmerica
43 posted on
08/20/2017 4:37:06 PM PDT by
G Larry
(There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
To: ProgressingAmerica
44 posted on
08/20/2017 4:44:08 PM PDT by
ETL
(See my FR Home page for a closer look at today's Communist/Anarchist protest groups)
To: ProgressingAmerica
47 posted on
08/20/2017 4:53:33 PM PDT by
Bellflower
(Who dares believe Jesus?)
To: ProgressingAmerica
Based on thier recent behaviour I’d call them, Aggressives.
49 posted on
08/20/2017 5:56:59 PM PDT by
edzo4
(Democrats playbook = promise everything, deliver nothing, blame someone else.)
To: ProgressingAmerica
Superheroes. They all think they have unique superpowers to do battle with racist idiot muggles.
So many problems have already been solved, that they reinvent or resurrect them so they can say they battled and beat bad, evil people, too.
52 posted on
08/20/2017 6:23:33 PM PDT by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: ProgressingAmerica
If progressives changed their name again, what new name would they choose?
LOSER!
They have lost over 1,000 seats and now are using violence to get back in power.
To: ProgressingAmerica
It wouldn't be until the 1930's and Franklin Roosevelt that the progressives had to again take a new title. But this time, they took a new title for a different reason: They had thoroughly scared the crap out of the American people. Americans had seen progressivism in action for what it actually is and not just nebulous propaganda dressed up in cute words over the last two decades, and they were frightened by it. Every prior re-branding of progressivism was "simply" due to a failure to reach critical mass. But now, they were in active camouflage. The progressives were in hiding, they were wearing masks, masquerading in disguise, something they had never really had to do before. Interesting, slightly off according to William Safire: the word liberal was changed - essentially inverted - in the 1920s (source: Safires New Political Dictionary)
Liberal was the word for people you and I would agree with before the socialists stole the word from us. They were able to accomplish that for one simple reason: journalism is bad news. Bad news sells. And yet, journalism claims to be objective - so their business model depends on making people think that negativity is objectivity. Which is a perfect definition of cynicism. Journalism is cynical toward society, but this does not map to cynicism about government. To the contrary, government only raison dêtre is to ameliorate the shortcomings of society - so naiveté WRT government maps perfectly with cynicism toward government.
And if you want a perfect label for liberalism it would have to convey that disposition. And tyranny comes pretty close.
55 posted on
08/21/2017 6:30:24 AM PDT by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(A press can be 'associated,' or a press can be independent. Demand independent presses.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson