Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

PG-13 warning
1 posted on 04/30/2017 2:34:56 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Borges; DollyCali; Perdogg

ping


2 posted on 04/30/2017 2:35:30 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

Pacino beat out over a dozen actors for the lead role. Actors like Jack Nicholson and Robert De Niro, and he was a relative newbie.


3 posted on 04/30/2017 2:39:29 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Man-made global liberalism is killing the planet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar
Other than Brando, for whom the film was a triumphal comeback, The Godfather made the careers of just about all involved.
5 posted on 04/30/2017 2:44:41 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

I think Pacino did a lot of great work. Almost all of it before “Scarface”. Don’t know what happened to him after “Scarface”. Rarely good after that, IMO.


6 posted on 04/30/2017 2:52:05 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Abortion is what slavery was: immoral but not illegal. Not yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

Read the book, only saw part three, which I bought the soundtrack for, I saw Brando in person years ago...my favorite of his was in Guys ad Dolls.


7 posted on 04/30/2017 2:57:34 PM PDT by lulu16 (May the Good Lord take a liking to you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

Most over rated movies I’ve ever seen. Good, but not the “most important and influential movies ever made” IMO.


13 posted on 04/30/2017 3:15:30 PM PDT by raybbr (That progressive bumper sticker on your car might just as well say, "Yes, I'm THAT stupid!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar
I may be in a solid minority, but I liked The Godfather Part III. And the more time that passes the better it's becoming. Is it up to the bar set by Part II? No. It's doubtful that any sequel could. But as the closing chapter of the life of a man who became his father despite his best wishes, and now is facing those choices in light of his mortality, it is a fitting end.

And tying the Corleone's family saga in with the Vatican politics circa late Seventies was a nice touch. Overlook Sofia Coppola's presence (it really should have been Winona Ryder as Mary) and it holds its own remarkably well.

15 posted on 04/30/2017 3:19:31 PM PDT by Ciaphas Cain (The choice to be stupid is not a conviction I am obligated to respect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

love that movie trilogy. I always hated Keaton in the role of Kay, though.


16 posted on 04/30/2017 3:21:22 PM PDT by ronniesgal (still winning (and a self satisfied Pr!ck, according to WMarshal))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

If De Niro doesn’t spout off his political views, I’ll watch it. One and two are my top favorite movies. He hasn’t yet learned that his sole purpose in life is to pretend to be other people for my pleasure.

Hard to get a chemistry like that, especially (or maybe because) of such a young director.

Coppola was so afraid that the studio would voce him to use a big name like Robert Redford, Coppola shot most of Michael’s scenes firs so it would be too expensive to shot and the studio would have to go with Pacino as Michael. Robert Redford - I don’t think so.

The one person I think was believable in #1, but was very disappointing #2 was Diane Keaton. After #1, she just seemed wooden. Last year, I read a copy of the original screen play of #2, and in that version she takes the kids and goes to New Hampshire and Hagel has to go and get her to come back to Nevada - hence what’s missing in the movie - if she was to the compound, how did she have an abortion - plot flaw in #2 that bother me for years.

MHO - FWIW


20 posted on 04/30/2017 4:05:01 PM PDT by KosmicKitty (Waiting for inspirations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

I’ve seen Parts 1 & 2 a few dozen times each (I never cared for Part 3.) After all these years, I still don’t understand what specifically Fredo did in Part 2 to betray Michael. Yes, I know he talked to Roth and Johnny Ola, then later denied that he had ever met them. However, I still have a few questions: Who opened the curtains in Michael’s bedroom just before the attempted hit? Fredo? Who found the two gunmen so quickly afterwards and killed them both? Fredo? That seems unlikely to me when you consider how bumbling and useless Fredo was in Part 1 when Vito was gunned down at the fruit stand. Also, how did he elude all of the men and dogs who were searching the compound immediately after the attempted hit?


22 posted on 04/30/2017 4:21:37 PM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson