Skip to comments.YouTube reverses some restrictions on gay-themed content
Posted on 03/20/2017 8:32:18 PM PDT by Olog-hai
The YouTube video shows two women, dressed in suits and ties. They smile; they sniffle back tears; they gaze into each others eyes. They are reading their wedding vows to one another.
The four-minute video titled Her Vows contains no nudity, violence or swearing. Theres no revealing clothing. No one is engaging in activities that have a high risk of injury or death. And yet, YouTube had deemed the video unsuitable for people under 18.
YouTube acknowledged Monday that it might have made a mistake, saying in a tweet, Some videos have been incorrectly labeled and thats not right. Were on it! More to come. The restriction on the vows video was lifted by Monday afternoon. But others including one from YouTube celebrity Tyler Oakley titled 8 Black LGBTQ+ Trailblazers Who Inspire Me remained on YouTubes age-restricted list.
Several YouTube users, many of them have in the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community, have been complaining that their videos are categorized as restricted for no obvious reasons.
(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...
No need to worry though, they’re probably no longer together since this was posted.
But of course. Its bigoted and all that, if anyone has any objection to any homosexual content. That’s how the liberal mind works.
Two women dressed in suits and ties?? They are both wanting to be the man????
I didn’t think gays had any restrictions on YouTube. These days, they usually get treated like every Teacher’s Pet.
Perversion is unsuitable for all...
all I got to say is that nothing was wrong with that video but this is the camel getting its head in the tent. it will degenerate.
What video is that?
the description of two lesbians repeating there vows. it is refed to in the article.
Why do you say nothing was wrong with it?
not sexual at this point. the problem is that eventually it will become x rated stuff that is posted as those within the gay community try and push the boundary of expectable posts... have no real opinion on homosexuality. I don’t even understand it.
Majority view on this site is that it is an abomination. Just in case you did not know.
In addition, claiming to be “married” is an attack on the family and religious rights, which are enshrined in the nation’s Constitution and are also prime targets of Marxists.
never cared about majority view. and consensus is just being wreak willed.. my view of the whole homosexuality is that it is a deviance but not signs of someone being evil. we are all sinners and I will have my judgment of this venal sin but I wont give my condemnation. that is in god’s hands not mine and in my judgment it should not be anyone else’s
so I guess I have a opinion.
We already know what kind of judgment comes on a land for that kind of behavior. And yes, it is evil.
suggest self examination because we all have things that make up ourselves that can be judged in the same way by others.
But queers kissing in a Disney movie is ok...
That doesn’t entail abandonment of one’s principles. Nor does it entail standing idly by while others make the country a target for divine wrath.
I trust gods divine wrath if you want to call it that. I don’t trust my own. so many times through out history mans sinful nature gets in the way of seeing the truth . I don’t pretend to understand homosexuality and I am lucky enough to say it is not my burden to carry. I have other burdens and chose to treat those that I differ my views on sex with the same respect I hope to see from them....I disagree with you on god being a wrathful entity we just perceive it as that because usually the end result of not fallowing him appears wrathful but all that is happening is the end result of our sinful ways catching up to us. god does not target us we just create the seeds of our own destruction.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.