![](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-fiGVhiSe7Es/UC2iXPZr6dI/AAAAAAAAIBo/dnH7JqKKqVQ/s1600/sidepicture.jpg"left")
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.
To get on or off the Greenfield ping list please reply to this post.
Posted on 03/13/2017 1:51:02 PM PDT by wtd
Know Your Military Colonists Daniel Greenfield
“Military Colonist” is a term that has gone out of fashion in this brave new world of “No Human Being is Illegal” and “Every Refugee Deserves to be Resettled.”
The university history professor with an office full of fake Indian jewelry and a view of the parking lot will lecture on the military colonies of the Roman period, always careful to emphasize their eventual fate. And he may even get up to the 16th century. But he’ll stay away from the present.
But if you are going to take land or seize power, you will need military colonists to hold it. The military colonist may be an ex-soldier, but he’s more likely to be someone the empire, present or future, doesn’t particularly need or have a use for. The Czars used serfs. The present day military colonist who shows up at JFK or LAX may also be a peasant with even less value to his culture.
Mexico’s military colonists are not military. Often they aren’t even Mexican. But they have managed to take back California without firing a shot. Unless you count the occasional drive by shooting.
(Excerpt) Read more at mideastoutpost.com ...
*******
Comment posted at site which I was introduced to this essay - VladTepesblog:
There is a concept that Daniel introduced me to in this article that haunts me.
It is the geopolitical tool of Military Colonists.
Here is his article and yes, while it is 100% applicable to the Islamic migration invasion of Europe which is easy to see, and the one in the US Obama engineered and the one Trudeau engineered for Canada, which seem harder to spot in the media but far easier on the streets, this article screams to be read in the more traditional use of the term, as Turkish expats flex their muscle across states not fully obedient to Erdogan’s will.
MIDEAST OUTPOST is proudly powered by WordPress
Just some guy's blog.
Free blog, too. Cost him nothing. Yep. Just some blog.
America of 2013 cannot go on being this way indefinitely. It probably can’t even manage another two decades without major changes of some kind. Afghanistan 2013 however can go on being the way it is indefinitely. And that sustainability is what makes its people effective military colonists. Living the Afghan lifestyle in London or Los Angeles is even sustainable because food and housing are free.
That just leaves large packs of nomadic youths roaming the streets, selling drugs and rioting at the slightest provocation until it’s time for them to get married and make more nomadic youths of their own. It’s not that different from Afghanistan. It’s the tribal life transplanted to the West. It’s a culture with no real purpose except to produce young males eager to fight and expand tribal power and a religion with no real purpose except to affirm that as a religious duty.
Islam embodies expansionism. Its directives of male violence and female subjugation have no other end. They protect the tribal imperatives of endogamy and violence, of inbreeding and the feud. It has no ideas except to get bigger and that makes its followers into ideal military colonists.
Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Center. This appeared on his blog of September 18.
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.
To get on or off the Greenfield ping list please reply to this post.
If borders are not secure and defended, neither the nation nor the culture survives. Such has always been the case throughout world history.
Thanks for the ping. BTTT.
The only legitimate sources of information are the NY Times, CNN and the Washington Post, right? Bloggers would be natural allies of FR against the MSM, if idiots like you didn’t drive them away.
Like Mainz?
Wait, this blogger is a dirty, mumbling drunk? How can you tell?
Or is it ALL bloggers? How can we tell?
BenLurkin wrote: "the military colonies of the Roman period, always careful to emphasize their eventual fate""Like Mainz?"
I have to look that up - not familiar with that history to give a proper reply 
or like the Pricipality of Antioch or the Kingdom of Jerusalem both more recent examples and perhaps more relevant examples for the blogger
Using a free blog service is a lead indicator.
Like an indicator that a bum is using a library computer.
An indicator like that.
Your very nametag is an indicator.
That's like saying I should pay app designers $3.99 a pop to use their software when I could get their free version for nothing, albeit dodging a few ads and not having full access to all the goodies I wouldn't use anyway.
So it can't just be a matter of what website I use; that's too global, huh? What other factors would warrant lumping every single blogger into the “dirty, drunken bum” category?
Oops. I forgot the mumbling.
A dirty, mumbling, drunken bum sitting in the public library using Wordpress.
He probably carries around a used corn-on-the-cob husk to clean his armpits once a month when he showers, too.
Do we even know if he ever bathes? He’s probably homeless. Bums are always stinky because they’re all homeless.
If you were trying to buy dinner, would you prefer a
restaurant or some dude out by the dumpster?
Correct.
That’s snarky and all, but I still can’t figure out why anyone and everyone who uses a free site is considered in your mind a dirty, mumbling, drunken bum.
??
Eh! So what? You're just a blogger! (Freeper of the Year that year BTW)
Daniel Greenfield is arguably one of the finest Conservative writers alive but, he too is just a blogger.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.