Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why We Need to Redefine the “Cure” for Cancer
Vox ^ | Ravi Parikh

Posted on 03/07/2017 2:06:10 PM PST by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: djf

Not up on statistics since I retired. It may well be.


41 posted on 03/08/2017 8:38:14 AM PST by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Since you were in the cancer cure business, why doesn’t everyone get a scan every year? That would find EVERYTHING and really be a cost savings for the medical community because cancers would be found in stage 1 and other aliments would be found and treated very quickly. It seems only the rich get it and that seems stupid to me. I can’t imagine it costing more then a MRI or the other one....lol. Begins with a “C” I think.

CAT Scans are cheaper, but can be cancer-causing as they have much more radiation than even regular X-Rays. And when these scans can cost over $1000, that's a lot of money to be spending every year for every person.

http://www.diffen.com/difference/CT_Scan_vs_MRI
42 posted on 03/08/2017 12:40:27 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: All

Folks, all cancer is in a sense the same.
Paul Warburg won the Nobel prize in medicine in like 1939 or so for his work on cancer.

It is undifferentiated or overdifferentiated cells that have, as their basis of energy production, fermentation rather than oxidation.

The cells have turned on their telomere formation, so they are, in effect, immortal.

Along with various enzymatic changes - most of which are detectable by the immune system, but a few that it “masks” and hides.

Review Warburgs work, and his theories on “respiratory enzymes”. Cancer seems to be “near death”, cells which are older and scheduled to die or be internally consumed, but which live on and escape.

A close friend of mine has a mass in his lower colon. He rejected any surgery or chemo therapies and has gone natural. Originally, he lost about 25 lbs and looked like hell.
Now his weight is back up by 20 lbs and he is active outside and stuff.

He’s taking essiac and apricot seeds, along with a few others - s soon as he was originally diagnosed, he drastically upped his vitamin D and C input.

I told him about carnosine and he started that as well.


43 posted on 03/08/2017 5:06:30 PM PST by djf ("She wore a raspberry beret, the kind you find in a second hand store..." - Prince)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: All

The official mainstream “war on cancer” has been an unofficial “war” on the unsuspecting public: to keep them misinformed and misguided about the real truth of this “war.” The “moonshot” program is an extension or reincarnation of the enduring deep racket.

Once you recognize that you see that this statement in this piece is pure propaganda: “Our cancer moonshot is a worthwhile goal.” Continuing with a verified racket isn’t worthwhile. It is only to a criminal or ignoramus.

The orthodox cancer establishment has been saying a cure for cancer “is just around the corner” and “we’re winning the war on cancer” for decades. It’s all hype and lies (read Dr. Guy Faguet’s ‘War on cancer” or Dr. Sam Epstein’s work).

Since the war on cancer began orthodox medicine hasn’t progressed in their basic highly profitable therapies: it still uses only highly toxic, deadly things like radiation, chemo, surgery, and drugs that have killed millions of people instead of the disease.

As long as the official “war on cancer” is a HUGE BUSINESS based on expensive TREATMENTS/INTERVENTIONS of a disease instead of its PREVENTION, logically, they will never find a cure for cancer. The upcoming moonshot-war on cancer inventions, too, will include industry-profitable gene therapies of cancer treatment. The lucrative game of the medical business is to endlessly “look for” a cure but not “find” a cure. Practically all resources in the phony ‘war on cancer’ are poured into treating cancer but almost none in the prevention of the disease. It’s proof positive that big money and a total lack of ethics rule the official medical establishment.

At the same time, this same orthodox cancer cartel has been suppressing and squashing a number of very effective and beneficial alternative cancer approaches. You probably guessed why: effective, safe, inexpensive cancer therapies are cutting into the astronomical profits of the medical mafia’s lucrative treatments. That longstanding decadent activity is part of the fraud of the war on cancer.

If the public were to scrutinize what the medical industry and its government pawns are telling them about the ‘war on cancer’ instead of blindly believing what they’re saying, they’d find that the cancer industry and the cancer charities have been dismissing, ignoring, and obfuscating the true causes of cancer while mostly putting the blame for cancer on the individual, denying or dismissing the serious harms from orthodox cancer treatments, and resorting to deceptive cancer statistics to “educate” (think: mislead) the public that their way of treatment is actually successful (read the well referenced epilogue of a scholarly article if you search online for”A Mammogram Letter The British Medical Journal Censored” by Rolf Hefti — or directly at http://www.supplements-and-health.com/mammogram.html — and scroll down to the afterword that addresses the fraudulent ‘war on cancer’).

What the medical establishment “informs” the public about is about as truthful as what the political establishment keeps telling them. Not to forget, the corporate media (the mainstream fake news media) is a willing tool to spread these distortions, lies, and the scam of the war on cancer.

Do you really think it’s a coincidence that double Nobel laureate Linus Pauling called the ‘war on cancer’ a fraud? If you look closer you’ll come to the same conclusion. But...politics and self-serving interests of the conventional medical cartel, and their allied corporate media, keep the real truth far away from the public at large.


44 posted on 03/09/2017 8:36:49 PM PST by Mali71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf

Yet my mom did the same thing, and died in nine months.

She was a life-long vegetarian, ate only organic grains, vegetables and legumes, and got colon cancer which became liver cancer.

She refused chemo and surgery, went whole hog the Pottenger/Adele Davis/on and on “natural” method, and it didn’t work in the slightest.

Ed


45 posted on 03/10/2017 2:26:16 AM PST by Sir_Ed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Sir_Ed

So sorry about your loss. Kinda made me think though, you said it “spread to her liver”, I’m kinda betting it was in her liver first, and spread to her colon.

The liver is the fastest growing organ we have. That’s why it might be the other way around.


46 posted on 03/10/2017 5:48:21 AM PST by djf ("She wore a raspberry beret, the kind you find in a second hand store..." - Prince)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: djf

No, it was her colon first, they said...

Really sad. She thought she was immune because she ate so healthy, but it didn’t prevent it in the slightest.

Ed


47 posted on 03/10/2017 4:54:57 PM PST by Sir_Ed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson