Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What sank the Titanic? New documentary claims fire weakened hull
abc7chicago.com ^ | Thursday, January 05, 2017 12:41PM | Staff

Posted on 01/05/2017 1:48:18 PM PST by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
Video at link................
1 posted on 01/05/2017 1:48:18 PM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

None of that was in the movie.. didn’t happen.


2 posted on 01/05/2017 1:51:31 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Jews sank the Titanic. Hello, IceBerg ?


3 posted on 01/05/2017 2:03:27 PM PST by stylin19a (Hey obamas-it's Ray Charles time - "Hit the Road Jack"...you know the rest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
My issue with this theory is that the iceberg struck below the waterline, and the damage was below the waterline. A bunker fire may have reached 1,000°C, but the outside hull steel plates that were in contact with the water never could have reached temperatures high enough to compromise their strength.

Ever boil water in a paper cup on a campfire as a scout?

4 posted on 01/05/2017 2:03:42 PM PST by Yo-Yo ( Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

Was a rapper, eh?...........


5 posted on 01/05/2017 2:03:56 PM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Forensic testing of rivets from the bow plats indicate that they were substandard and not up to specs, so somebody was cheating the company. There were many things that added up to a disaster.................


6 posted on 01/05/2017 2:06:11 PM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Many years ago a team of researchers retrieved a piece of the Titanic's hull from the ocean floor. It was subsequently put through an extensive series of metallurgical tests. In addition to the sample itself, the son of one of the workmen in the shipyard provided a divot: a slug of steel punched out of the hull plates for the rivets. It proved useful in comparing Titanic's steel prior to launch with whatever eighty-plus years of frigid seawater had done to it (it was determined that there had been no change in the metal's composition).

What they found was rather intriguing. Titanic's hull plating had a higher than normal sulfur content. In fact, it wouldn't have even made for good rebar. As a result Titanic's hull steel was EXCEPTIONALLY brittle already. Figure in the cold temperature acting upon it and it made it even worse. Instead of bending inward, the hull had pieces of it break off.

The Titanic was a disaster of materials as much as human hubris.

7 posted on 01/05/2017 2:06:36 PM PST by Ciaphas Cain (The choice to be stupid is not a conviction I am obligated to respect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Wilhelm Gustloff was a WAY worse disaster. Several times over.


8 posted on 01/05/2017 2:07:33 PM PST by jbrown7.62x39 (Holy crap. We really are gonna MAGA!! What a great time to be alive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Dang, beat me to it! :-)


9 posted on 01/05/2017 2:07:38 PM PST by Ciaphas Cain (The choice to be stupid is not a conviction I am obligated to respect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain

See post #6...............


10 posted on 01/05/2017 2:08:01 PM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

Iceberg....Goldberg....Greenberg....what’s the difference?


11 posted on 01/05/2017 2:08:28 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jbrown7.62x39

I’ve often wondered, even as a child, why they did not collect every mattress on that ship to use as life boats?.....................


12 posted on 01/05/2017 2:09:28 PM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Titanic in Five Seconds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OuSdU8tbcHY


13 posted on 01/05/2017 2:09:44 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Had decrapio lost that poker hand, the ship would have left the pier those few seconds earlier, and would have missed that berg.


14 posted on 01/05/2017 2:10:40 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
Had decrapio lost that poker hand, the ship would have left the pier those few seconds earlier, and would have missed that berg.

Someone should tell Leo, that if only they had Global Warming, there wouldn't have been any icebergs and the Titanic wouldn't have sunk.

15 posted on 01/05/2017 2:11:36 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Too much panic. Hundreds were trampled. Nearly 500 killed outright when the first Russian torpedo that slammed into her port side, struck a deck that had a drained swimming pool. All that tile came loose and acted as an enormous fragmentation grenade and killed everyone on the deck but 3 people. Almost 10,000 German civilians died. 9,400 and some change, I think


16 posted on 01/05/2017 2:13:37 PM PST by jbrown7.62x39 (Holy crap. We really are gonna MAGA!! What a great time to be alive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

May have multiplied the effect of the collision
but what sank the Titanic was the fact that the
water tight bulkheads did not completely seal
being open at the top. Once enough water came in
to put that compartment underwater the next would begin
to fill especially starting from forward.
It is possible that had the iceberg struck amidships
the remaining buoyancy would have been enough to
keep the bulkheads above water level.

Bunker fires were not that uncommon in the age of steam.


17 posted on 01/05/2017 2:15:51 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Also, only one lifeboat cleared the davits, but it fell and capsized. The rest weren’t dropped due to the unimaginable chaos


18 posted on 01/05/2017 2:16:02 PM PST by jbrown7.62x39 (Holy crap. We really are gonna MAGA!! What a great time to be alive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I thought the Russians did it??


19 posted on 01/05/2017 2:18:26 PM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain
Figure in the cold temperature acting upon it and it made it even worse. Instead of bending inward, the hull had pieces of it break off.

that's what I remember from my metal training back in my navy nuclear power training. The Titanic was VERY BRITTLE, just waiting for a disaster. IT broke instead of bending.


20 posted on 01/05/2017 2:21:31 PM PST by politicianslie (What would a terrorist do if he were made POTUS? : Exactly what Hussein Obama is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson