Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia says malfunction, not bomb, probably caused deadly crash of military jet
Washoington Post ^ | 12/29/2016

Posted on 12/29/2016 3:43:05 PM PST by BenLurkin

The three-engine Tu-154, flying to Syria from the southern Russian city of Sochi, crashed shortly after takeoff, killing all 92 aboard. Why it went down remains a mystery, although Russian officials are leaning toward accidental causes, such as mechanical problems or pilot error, rather than an act of sabotage.

...

Bainetov also said that an analysis of the pilots’ remarks before the crash indicated an “emergency situation” on board, but he did not elaborate.

Earlier, the Russian tabloid Life, which is close to the security services and regularly obtains surveillance camera footage after accidents, said the captain yelled “the flaps!” and a string of profanities shortly before the plane crashed. The flight was in the air for a total of 70 seconds and reached an altitude of 820 feet, Bainetov said Thursday.

Sokolov said 19 bodies, along with 230 body parts, have been retrieved by divers at the crash site.

Tu-154 jets, which have been in service for 33 years, were once the workhorse of the commercial airline industry here and are still widely used by government ministries.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Travel
KEYWORDS: crash; jet; malfunction; russia

1 posted on 12/29/2016 3:43:05 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Much to early to tell what this means.

He might have been calling for flaps hoping to make an emergency landing.

Or the flaps could have gone into some position not compatible with flight.


2 posted on 12/29/2016 3:54:53 PM PST by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Who serviced the flaps the last time and were they tampered with?


3 posted on 12/29/2016 3:56:35 PM PST by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon

Pilot may have been in a hurry on the checklist and forgot to deploy the flaps before takeoff. It’s happened before.

Aircraft stalls and crashes.


4 posted on 12/29/2016 4:12:10 PM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Not a surprise. Errors and omissions unrelated to anything but human fallibility explain most accidents.


5 posted on 12/29/2016 4:15:15 PM PST by Tax-chick (I love Thomas Sowell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

Never flew nor studied heavy jets so I assumed that the aircraft would not have gained any altitude loaded heavily if the flaps were not properly set for takeoff.

I would have thought it would go into the bushes at the end of the runway when it ran out of the ground cushion..

Not arguing the point as I have no time in big iron.


6 posted on 12/29/2016 4:33:30 PM PST by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

Xactly. Recall the Northwest DC-9 flight out of Detroit Wayne about 1992 or so. No flaps set; lifts off barely and promptly crashes in Romulus near I-94.

My Detroit area terminal was located just down the street from the crash site and for several years after I was spooked every time I used the onramp to I-94 where so many had perished.


7 posted on 12/29/2016 4:35:26 PM PST by CARTOUCHE (There's a new sheriff in town and a new definition of hope and change is emerging.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon

TU-154 is a gas guzzling loud beast that is currently the fastest cruising airliner since the Concorde left service.

Which may barely get it off the ground loaded with no flaps and crash soon after.


8 posted on 12/29/2016 4:41:20 PM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon

Apparently never got above 820 feet


9 posted on 12/29/2016 4:43:08 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CARTOUCHE

That’s what I was thinking also. I was a student at U of M when that DC-9 went down.


10 posted on 12/29/2016 5:38:39 PM PST by CASchack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

TU-154 is a gas guzzling loud beast that is currently the fastest cruising airliner since the Concorde left service.

Which may barely get it off the ground loaded with no flaps and crash soon after.

...

I like your line of thought. An old Soviet airliner like that probably requires special procedures to fly and lacks the safety features of modern airliners.


11 posted on 12/29/2016 5:44:40 PM PST by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson