Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japan launching 'space junk' collector
France24 ^ | 9 Dec 2016 | Afp

Posted on 12/09/2016 4:23:07 AM PST by csvset

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: csvset

I’d use a tractor beam.


21 posted on 12/09/2016 5:44:11 AM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: June2
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
22 posted on 12/09/2016 5:45:14 AM PST by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: csvset

The biggest problem is that a lot of this space junk is traveling at enormous speeds, so is very difficult to catch without destroying the catcher.

One interesting way around this problem is called “the big ball of goo”. A large polymer foam ball that can handle repeated heating and cooling, as well as collisions from high speed junk.

Once in orbit, the satellite inflates a large “balloon” around itself with inert gas, except for its engine and guidance thrusters, then extends tubes that will carry the spray of expansion polymer foam into the balloon.

Once the “big ball of goo” is created, the satellite’s engine and thrusters guide it on an eccentric orbit to cross paths with as much of the space junk as possible.

And once it has collected a large amount of junk, it reenters and burns up in the atmosphere.


23 posted on 12/09/2016 6:20:00 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Friday, January 20, 2017. Reparations end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Wu

A smelter or something. It would probably make sense to start the engineering on the ground with an eye to utility to future purposes as well as the immediate utility. Some sort of “modular” system whereby, for instance, as you pointed out fuel tanks could be used for construction after lifted into orbit.


24 posted on 12/09/2016 6:42:45 AM PST by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: csvset

For years I have wondered why the USA and Russia did not have one of these orbiting the earth, knocking junk out of orbit and toward the earth where the junk would burn up on entry, or fall into the oceans.


25 posted on 12/09/2016 7:50:33 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Conan: To crush your enemies, and to hear the lamentations of their women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csvset
Blowing up enemy satellites is a terrible idea because they break up into thousands of untrackable small fragments, each moving at supersonic speeds. Better to either fry their electronics and let them float around harmlessly or somehow pluck them out of orbit and send them into the ocean.

Could this be used for the latter? I think space is an interesting frontier of military and political maneuvering that most people don't see.

26 posted on 12/09/2016 8:33:20 AM PST by pepsi_junkie (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

I have not researched this in depth (and am willing to be corrected if wrong), but dead (uncontrolled) satellites and other debris are effectively abandoned and space belongs to no person or nation. So, it seems to parallel salvage of an abandoned vessel on the high seas. If the abandoned satellite/debris can be identified, the owner can be contacted to see if they want to recover custody (and pay the necessary costs for doing so). If they renounce title, then the salvor is free to do what they want with it. Since these objects are derelict, there is probably no effective way to recover them (by either the owner or salvor) and the proper course of action is to remove the hazard.

This is actually a tremendous business opportunity . Once the technology is worked out, new satellites will probably be required to incorporate a deorbit technology or account for removal as part of program costs. Eventually, some sort of probably UN-coordinated effort will be developed to clear Earth’s orbit of such materials. Spacefaring countries and companies will pay into a common fund and the work will be bid out to companies who have the technology to perform the work.

I don’t know its name, but there was a Japanese anime series based on this concept (contracted removal of space debis from Earth orbit) some years ago. Guess this is the start of the real world follow-up.


27 posted on 12/09/2016 8:40:59 AM PST by Captain Rhino (Determined effort today forges tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie
DARPA has an idea about repairing or upgrading satellites. It could also disable satellites too. ; )

Phoenix Rising: New Video Shows Advances in Satellite Repurposing Program

28 posted on 12/09/2016 9:26:26 AM PST by csvset ( Illegitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: csvset
A countdown clock for the capture of HTV6 at the ISS.

Fan Fun Jaxa JP

29 posted on 12/09/2016 9:36:06 AM PST by csvset ( Illegitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csvset; All

I think what a lot of people are missing is that not everything up there is intact satellites. There are thousands of small bits and pieces from earlier collisions, which then can cause more new collisions, and so on. There was a documentary on one of the science channels recently about this. Even a chip of paint traveling at 15,000+ mph can blow right through a spacesuit.


30 posted on 12/09/2016 9:48:29 AM PST by pa_dweller (Trump 290, Clinton 232 - The vote heard 'round the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pa_dweller

31 posted on 12/09/2016 9:53:00 AM PST by Scythian_Reborn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

The cost of getting it up there doesn’t increase the value, it’s up there. And most of it is pure junk, bolts and bits of metal that come off during various transitions in missions. The biggest problem is inertia, the stuff is traveling faster than the speed of sound to stay in orbit, make it hurt bad when it hits something. Also makes it difficult to clean up.


32 posted on 12/09/2016 9:59:10 AM PST by discostu (Alright you primative screwheads, listen up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Scythian_Reborn

Yes, we once had our own space shuttle. Those were the days, eh?


33 posted on 12/09/2016 10:13:30 AM PST by pa_dweller (Trump 290, Clinton 232 - The vote heard 'round the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Commence Operation........VACU-SUCK!!!!


34 posted on 12/09/2016 10:14:41 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: csvset
Successful berthing of the H-II Transfer Vehicle "KOUNOTORI6" (HTV6) to the International Space Station (ISS)


35 posted on 12/13/2016 12:04:28 PM PST by csvset ( Illegitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson