I think they say God washed the evil from Mohammed's heart, and the black evil was deposited onto a stone, which was preserved there.
I'm posting more hocus-pocus below, their words, NOT mine:
Posted on 12/04/2016 2:10:47 PM PST by nickcarraway
I think they say God washed the evil from Mohammed's heart, and the black evil was deposited onto a stone, which was preserved there.
I'm posting more hocus-pocus below, their words, NOT mine:
150÷44=3.4090909091
Just the Dome of the rock mosque, it would be quite easy given our pinpoint accuracy. As the Mooslums topple Buddhist statues, Hebrew graves, and Christian churches. Why should we fear destruction of them and theirs?
In a sane world the entirety of Islam would look like Dresden after we unleashed hell on the last cult that wanted to take over the world.
Those bells are real dusty. Feather duster needed.
What? They just circle that thing and scream and pray?
You actually have a valid point. If Islam is allowed to carry on in the face of the ‘Great Satan’, then it is because Allah is protecting them; so they think.
It has nothing to do with America showing restraint and proportionate response.
To transform Islam requires convincing them that Allah has allowed America to destroy some of its exalted relics and sites with an eminent destruction of more of the same. They will then think Allah is displeased with them and will wonder why.
It is at this point of introspection that the Muslim adherent can be drilled that the ‘true’ Islam follower must wage the battle inside their own soul, that part of the soul that contains the infidel must be fought on the inside and never taken outside to other beings. The infidel behavior of others is never to be examined except by each person unto its own. The programming impulse to murder infidels outside oneself must be neutralized. In fact, to even question another person of their behavior to Islam is to be forbidden. It is all of it, to be contained inside each individual. There is to be no collective.
The teachings of Islam are to be considered as historical reading, not as a contemporary manifesto. The interpretation of such reading is to be sought from Islamic scholars who are aware of the dire consequences of taking up literal jihad according to the historical documents.
A destruction of an exalted site of Islam will serve as a new chapter of Islamic history that points to the horrible consequences of going against the introspective and secular approaches described above.
A current Muslim jihadist will have two choices, they can kill themselves or they can become defanged by struggling to battle the infidel that resides within them. In the latter case, the ‘peaceful Muslim’ is to be rewarded with work, family, status, and a standard of living.
All other persons originating from Muslim culture can go a secular route or convert to a belief system of their choosing, the latter of a Christian persuasion preferred.
The above is the approach of Mustafa Atatürk. If he isn’t already, he should be required reading in the War College on how to defeat Radical Islam ideology.
He of the founding of secular Turkey? Sad to say that Turkey is now radicalizing and moving more towards an Islamic State.
There is a radical wealthy Imam inside the USA who controls much of what Erdogan and others in power do in Turkey.
To me, Turkey as Asia Minor is an extension of the Holy land of the New Testament and should be returned to Christianity.
Because of its history and importance to Christianity, Constantinople has been respected as an international cosmopolitan center but that status is dissipating.
I think there are genies in all the hanging lamps. You guys mocking this better be careful or they will be released upon you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.