Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Govt Hires Should Have 3-5 Years of Qualifying Private Sector Experience

Posted on 11/24/2016 11:59:47 AM PST by Be Careful

Making 3-5 years Private Sector Experience in the area of the employment position a Federal Hiring Guideline Requirement will go a long way toward changing the quality of Public-Private interface as well as improving the bureaucratic culture.....IMHO


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
It's a start......
1 posted on 11/24/2016 11:59:47 AM PST by Be Careful
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Be Careful

So, McDs would count, as long as it was a job in a gummint cafeteria? I like it.

Please, the news media next. So tired of these 20-something bloggers showing up on cable news as pundits or experts of some kind when the only job they’ve had is tantamount to posting on FR.


2 posted on 11/24/2016 12:08:44 PM PST by bigbob (We have better coverage than Verizon - Can You Hear Us Now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Be Careful

the federal government won’t be doing much hiring after Jan 20th.

LOL


3 posted on 11/24/2016 12:12:03 PM PST by vooch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Be Careful

Not a bad idea!

Another thing Congress needs to do is look at some of its “mandates” to the bureaucracies. I will generalize this to keep it short. Often Congress will dictate that an agency/office/bureau whatever will keep “track of something” usually its some form of performance metric. Nine times out of ten is one that looks good or sounds good to the constituents back home but is meaningless in practice. Where its truly wasteful and mind numbing to the person doing it is require that a full time GS’er be assigned to it. Too often its something that can take anywhere from 15 minutes to two hours to do. Either the agency that this is forced on is either too cowardly to point it out or simply doesn’t want to lose the slot. It’s usually bureaucratic cowardice is the reason its not done.


4 posted on 11/24/2016 12:13:30 PM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Be Careful

Good idea for congress but where are you going to find people with 3-5 years experience killing people for the Army?


5 posted on 11/24/2016 12:15:40 PM PST by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reily

There should be a rule like the proposed Trump admin regulations rule...for every one hired (at least) two must be let go.


6 posted on 11/24/2016 12:16:13 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reily

How about 30 years? Hire no one under 50. They’ll collect a SMALL retirement check.


7 posted on 11/24/2016 12:16:24 PM PST by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Be Careful

it will also raise entry wages


8 posted on 11/24/2016 12:29:18 PM PST by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Be Careful; All

I doubt a government employee can change a light bulb or boil water.


9 posted on 11/24/2016 12:32:04 PM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Be Careful

Perhaps for some gov jobs, but this isn’t practical for all of them...Military being the obvious example — you aren’t even going to get young officers (28 at the absolute oldest per regs, and obviously most are going to be early 20’s), never mind enlisted people, with 3-5 years of experience.


10 posted on 11/24/2016 12:33:00 PM PST by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Flag burners can go screw -- I'm mighty PROUD of that ragged old flag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

5:1


11 posted on 11/24/2016 12:33:38 PM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Be Careful

Not accepting anyone who has recent experience (4-6 years) with any non-profit with an ideological position that would shape the federal government. For example, no one with an environmental non-profit gets to work with the EPA or Bureau of Land Management for half a decade.


12 posted on 11/24/2016 12:55:06 PM PST by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Be Careful

So the Marine Corps is going to only recruit ex mercenaries? This sounds like one of those ideas that only makes sense if you don’t know what it is that government does.


13 posted on 11/24/2016 1:10:48 PM PST by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

The implied context was the civilian GS scale. Of course, there are a few other civilian government scales thus could apply to.


14 posted on 11/24/2016 1:19:02 PM PST by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Be Careful

I had over 25 years private sector experience and two agencies fought For me.


15 posted on 11/24/2016 1:19:16 PM PST by mom4melody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

I’ll up you 5... 10-1


16 posted on 11/24/2016 1:26:11 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

Sold!


17 posted on 11/24/2016 1:28:49 PM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

LOL. Have a GREAT Thanksgiving! MAGA!


18 posted on 11/24/2016 1:29:58 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Be Careful

I was an HR manager for many years in a manufacturing company. We would very seldom hire people with a government background. And the few times we decided to make exceptions, we usually regretted it. They just don’t have the same sense of urgency and commitment.


19 posted on 11/24/2016 3:24:23 PM PST by Old_Grouch (69 and AARP-free. Monthly FR contributor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Be Careful

It’s extremely difficult to even get into the system without prior military service, being a military spouse with preference rights, or having a disability.

Just leveling he playing field for all applicants would help a lot.


20 posted on 11/24/2016 7:52:01 PM PST by Gil4 (And the trees are all kept equal by hatchet, ax and saw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson