Skip to comments.
A Night on the Battleship [USS Iowa] Overnight Tour $125
Atlas Obscura ^
| 10/05/16
| Atlas Obscura
Posted on 10/05/2016 11:19:15 AM PDT by BunnySlippers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: KrisKrinkle
21
posted on
10/05/2016 11:35:28 AM PDT
by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
To: BunnySlippers; MeganC; SkyDancer; Sarah Barracuda; beaversmom
I am Game.
Sadly I don't live in L.A.
In 2001 The Harbor Master of Benicia California was kind enough to give us a tour of the Reserve Fleet and I got REALLY close two The Iowa there.
It was amazing!
22
posted on
10/05/2016 11:40:09 AM PDT
by
KC_Lion
(Never Killary!)
To: DesertRhino
So....the Iowa had 9 giant 16 inch antiaircraft guns on its flight deck? Got it. Hey, this liberal urinalist was selected to be the military expert this day.
To: DesertRhino
heh heh
Many sources confuse the armaments for the Iowa.
24
posted on
10/05/2016 11:44:13 AM PDT
by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: BunnySlippers
I got paid to stay on an aircraft carrier. Will I pay to stay on a battleship? Our Navy is the best in the world! However, I am done staying on military ships.
25
posted on
10/05/2016 11:45:13 AM PDT
by
zaxtres
To: DesertRhino
Hell, I saw the discrepancies too and I wasn’t even in the Navy.
Still, I think they’re doing a service with these overnights.
26
posted on
10/05/2016 11:47:29 AM PDT
by
x1stcav
(Leftism is like rust: It corrodes 24 hours a day until eradicated.)
To: DesertRhino
Used for launching flying submarines.
27
posted on
10/05/2016 11:48:34 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: BunnySlippers
I sincerely hope that Atlas Obscura's followers in general are significantly less clueless in their obscurity than the author of this piece.
But give her points for knowing how many nautical miles a battleship takes up.
28
posted on
10/05/2016 11:51:00 AM PDT
by
norton
29
posted on
10/05/2016 11:52:31 AM PDT
by
loungitude
(The truth hurts.)
To: KC_Lion
Looks interesting. I did tour the USS Missouri when it was docked here at Bremerton,WA
30
posted on
10/05/2016 11:55:30 AM PDT
by
SkyDancer
("They Say That Nobody's Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
To: DesertRhino
31
posted on
10/05/2016 11:56:55 AM PDT
by
PapaBear3625
(Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
To: KrisKrinkle
The Japanese had munitions like that for their main batteries
32
posted on
10/05/2016 12:00:28 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: BunnySlippers
Those with Iowa state IDs get the basic tour for free.
BTW, here are the armaments made clearer:
https://forums.sufficientvelocity.com/threads/uss-iowa-bb-61-vs-ijn-yamato.5662/
...The Iowa-class battleships had nine 16-inch guns in three triple turrets. Each big gun had a range of 20.54 nautical miles (23.64 statute miles / 38 kilometers).
The Iowa-class battleships also bristled with anti-aircraft guns as part of their carrier escort role. These included 20 5-inch guns, 80 1.6-inch guns, and 49 .8-inch guns...
33
posted on
10/05/2016 12:02:05 PM PDT
by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: BunnySlippers
...
the USS Iowa had the biggest guns on any U.S. Navy ship, used primarily for anti-aircraft missions: nine 16-inch guns mounted on three stacked turrets on the flight deck (capable of carrying 2000 tons of firepower).Who writes these things, and where do they get their so-called information? The only anti-air missions for which a 16 inch naval gun is suited is if the planes are on the ground at an airfield within range of the ship. You can't shoot down fast moving aircraft with slow moving big guns except by accident! And since when do battleships have a flight deck? < /ex-Navy 5" gun loader rant >
34
posted on
10/05/2016 12:04:42 PM PDT
by
JimRed
(Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
To: PapaBear3625
A 16 inch shell bursting within a hundred yards of an aircraft would likely take it down. But the retargeting time to aim on any individual moving target makes it thoroughly impractical.
35
posted on
10/05/2016 12:08:56 PM PDT
by
JimRed
(Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
To: DesertRhino
Yeah, the author sounds like the same dopes who refer to bullets in clips. What a moron.
36
posted on
10/05/2016 12:12:28 PM PDT
by
Cobra64
(Common sense isn't common any more.)
To: doorgunner69; DesertRhino
I recall reading that the Japanese cruisers and battleships had “anti-aircraft” shells for their main 8in and 14/16 inch guns. The shells were used against YS Avenger torpedo bombers during the Battle of Leyte Gulf.
37
posted on
10/05/2016 12:13:25 PM PDT
by
GreyFriar
(Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
To: x1stcav
Tours are tours ... but the overnight with dinner and breakfast in the mess hall!
They say no fishing equipment, or chewing gum allowed on board. And no booze!
38
posted on
10/05/2016 12:16:38 PM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
(I Love Bull Markets!!!)
To: BunnySlippers
Could almost get me to go to LA.
To: onedoug
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson