Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who was the first President to issue over 1000 executive orders?
PGA Weblog ^

Posted on 07/24/2016 12:53:14 PM PDT by ProgressingAmerica

Answer: Theodore Roosevelt, President #26.

It has been said that Obama has racked up more debt than all previous presidents combined, and the same can nearly be said of Theodore Roosevelt with respect to executive orders.

The first 112 years of America : 25 Presidents.

The first 25 Presidents : 1262 executive orders.

Theodore Roosevelt : 1081 executive orders.

Keep in mind, Roosevelt didn't even serve two full terms, he was in for 7.5 years. And yes, many of these executive orders were explicitly to do an end-run around congressional authority, just like Obama does. Just like Obama.

In which term did Roosevelt issue more executive orders?

First term: 251 - just two shy of being more than any other president before him.(Grover Cleveland issued 253 - in 8 years. Roosevelt did 251 in 3.5 years)

Second term: 830 - more than 5 times any other president in any single term.

Most of those executive orders were issued in his second term, after he would have no longer been up for re-election - a classic scheme that progressives do. They assault us when they can't be held accountable anymore. Sound familiar?

Here is a table for illustrative purposes.


TOPICS: History; Reference
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhoeo; dictators; obamalegacy; progressingamerica; progressivism; roosevelt; theodoreroosevelt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 07/24/2016 12:53:14 PM PDT by ProgressingAmerica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

One thing is clear.

EVERY President should be limited to a single four year term.


2 posted on 07/24/2016 12:54:13 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It has been suggested to split the difference that a single six year term is what is needed.


3 posted on 07/24/2016 12:56:12 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mvonfr; Southside_Chicago_Republican; celmak; SvenMagnussen; miss marmelstein; ...
If anybody wants on/off the revolutionary progressivism ping list, send me a message

Progressives do not want to discuss their own history. I want to discuss their history.

Summary: Note how most of the damage was after there would be no more electoral consequence.

4 posted on 07/24/2016 12:56:15 PM PDT by ProgressingAmerica (We cannot leave history to the historians anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

There is a remedy. It is called impeachment. It should be used anytime a President exceeds his authority.


5 posted on 07/24/2016 12:56:37 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

I think President 4 years; the same with the House and Senate...and when that President leaves, the people that work for the Government should leave also....

Keeps the ‘water’ safer in Washington D.C. and there isn’t that ‘smell’ there....


6 posted on 07/24/2016 1:01:06 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump/Pence; Trump/Pence; Trump/Pence 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Better yet. Turn DC back in to swamp and let the states figure it out for themselves.


7 posted on 07/24/2016 1:01:40 PM PDT by foundedonpurpose (Is the rule of law dead? We will soon know! Hillary for prision.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica
Most of those executive orders were issued in his second term, after he would have no longer been up for re-election - a classic scheme that progressives do.

But that simply isn't true. The 22nd amendment wasn't ratified until 1951. Roosevelt didn't decide not to run in 1908 until well past the half-way point of his second term. He wouldn't have know he wasn't up for re-election. In fact, he came back after 4 years to try and take the White House again in 1912.

8 posted on 07/24/2016 1:02:18 PM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius (www.wilsonharpbooks.com - Sign up for my new release e-mail and get my first novel for free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Executive orders should have a sunset provision making the Congress to pass these into law within 3-6 months.


9 posted on 07/24/2016 1:03:07 PM PDT by stocksthatgoup (Don't argue with a Liberal. Ask him simple questions and listen to him stut)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I’d say 6 years, Four is too short.


10 posted on 07/24/2016 1:06:57 PM PDT by KosmicKitty (Waiting for inspiration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius; ProgressingAmerica

And gave us racist Woodrow Wilson.


11 posted on 07/24/2016 1:09:42 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
Presidents long operated under the under the anti-third term principle.

Theodore Roosevelt's cousin Franklin was the one who finally put it to bed, requiring a constitutional amendment.

But even without the amendment it is true. Here is a political cartoon from the time period illustrating.

Prior to progressivism, we had people and politicians moral enough to willingly step down in addition to rejecting such things, simply because it was the right thing to do. Now they all want to be tyrants. That's what 100+ years of progressivism will result in.

12 posted on 07/24/2016 1:14:31 PM PDT by ProgressingAmerica (We cannot leave history to the historians anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

Teddy was a dreadful president.

His reputation is saved by his very worthy military record and the fact that scumbag Wilson came so soon afterwards.


13 posted on 07/24/2016 1:15:37 PM PDT by WashingtonFire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

That rascal gets the credit for bringing us out of the depression when in fact it would have happened any way.

What he don`t get is credit for leading this nation away from the constitution and into this stinking evil anti God socialism.

Go Trump.


14 posted on 07/24/2016 1:15:42 PM PDT by ravenwolf (uakingua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup
Executive orders should have a sunset provision making the Congress to pass these into law within 3-6 months.

pretty good idea

15 posted on 07/24/2016 1:19:09 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

Sorry, i was not paying attention, my comment was on franklin.


16 posted on 07/24/2016 1:22:00 PM PDT by ravenwolf (uakingua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonFire

His record is also saved by the fact that authors are terrified to tell the truth about the Theodore Roosevelt progressive record.

Most biographies are nothing but puff pieces that focus nearly exclusively on his love of football, his hunting abilities, etc, and yes his military record as well.

Its mainly the touchy feely stuff. His presidency in relation to the constitution is a largely unwritten topic as an exclusive topic. The only times it is addressed is tucked away inside of other unrelated books, such as the one I linked to.


17 posted on 07/24/2016 1:22:55 PM PDT by ProgressingAmerica (We cannot leave history to the historians anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

Teddy also founded the Progressive Party, meaning he was a Liberal.

Case closed.


18 posted on 07/24/2016 1:23:06 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

People. Executive orders are not the issue!!! When Congress passes a law that says, for example, the US borders shall be defend its borders. The President often signs the law adding an executive that says something like, “I will defend the border with border patrol, e-verify, and overhead surveillance.” This sort of executive is rational and normal as withing the powers of the President.

A President cannot put out an executive order saying, “I’m not going to enforce the immigration law that was enacted 25 years ago because I don’t agree with it.” That’s not an executive order. That’s changing the law. Do you see the difference?” DO NOT LET THE MEDIA AND YOUR DOPEY FRIENDS AT WORK DEFEND OBAMA BY COMPARING NUMBERS of EXECUTIVE ORDERS!!! ITS NOT RELEVANT!!! How did our country get to this?


19 posted on 07/24/2016 1:26:33 PM PDT by Mustangman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

I wonder if impeachment should be more like a “vote of no confidence” by the party of the president, like they have in the parliamentary system.


20 posted on 07/24/2016 1:30:21 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson