Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here are the world’s top 10 gold producing mines
Mining.com ^ | 6/4/2016 | Frank Holmes

Posted on 06/07/2016 7:26:42 AM PDT by JimSEA

Gold output across the globe hit an all-time high in 2015, climbing 1.8 percent to 3,211 tonnes. Much of this growth was led by Mexico, whose output increased double digits (18 percent) from 112 tonnes in 2014 to 133 tonnes last year. Indonesia grew 20 percent, Kazakhstan 29 percent.

This year, global production is expected to level out as project development budgets were slashed during the three-year gold bear market. But with gold prices rebounding, miners are in a good position to be much more profitable.

Below, explore and discover the world’s top 10 gold producing mines.

(Excerpt) Read more at mining.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Science
KEYWORDS: geology; gold; mining

Here is the Carlin Pit as it is today. When I got there, it was Newmont subsidiary Carlin Gold and this pit and the Gold Quarry pit (then in development) was all there was and the offices were built in the mill and over the refinery. Today:

Whether we’re talking about glittering Las Vegas casinos or mining, gold and Nevada are nearly synonymous. The state accounts for 75 percent of total U.S. output, and it’s even estimated to be responsible for producing 3 percent of all gold ever mined in human history. Much of this comes out of the state’s Carlin Trend, the most abundant goldfield in the Western Hemisphere. Along the trend is Newmont’s historic Carlin project, which consists of three open pits and four underground mines. In May 2015, the company celebrated 50 successful years of gold production at the site, which was the first in North America to generate more than one million ounces in a single year.

1 posted on 06/07/2016 7:26:42 AM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

The year’s production is $117,000,000,000 at today’s prices. That’s still small compared to Obama’s profligate deficit spending, but it’s big relative to anything normal.


2 posted on 06/07/2016 7:44:28 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Somebody who agrees with me 80% of the time is a friend and ally, not a 20% traitor. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
The FBI observes that among the most ethically challenged emails Hillary was desperate to hide dealt w/ "Selling Access."

HERE'S HOW THE CLINTONS SCREWED AFRICA OUT OF ITS VALUABLE MINING RESOURCES: The head of a Canadian company with an enormous interest in Africa....in the Congo's mining and oil sector.....Lukas Lundin of Lundin Mining.....announced a $100 million donation to the Clinton Foundation on the heels of Hillary/s first presidential campaign....as she became Secy of State.

After the Congolese government attempted to regain control of its own mines, the State Department intervened on behalf of Lundin Mining and another mining company, Freeport Mines, also a Clinton foundation donor.

A round of talks in 2010, thought to be aided by the Clinton State Department, concluded with the pair of well- connected companies (Clinton Foundation donors) retaining their stakes in the mines and with the Congolese government being shut out of its own resources. (hat tip Schweizer book---Clinton Cash)

==========================================

THE STATE DEPT PAPER TRAIL---- Hillary/s State Dept Aide Shared Classified state Dept Info With Clinton Foundation
2012 Email Shows Hillary Aide Cheryl Mills sent info marked confidential to Clinton Foundation
Reported By Alana Goodman, Free Beacon September 28, 2015

A key aide of Hillary Clinton emailed classified information about the government in Congo to a staffer at the Clinton Foundation in 2012, according to a copy of the correspondence obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.

Cheryl Mills, Clinton/s chief of staff at the State Department, sent the email to the Clinton Foundation’s foreign policy director, Amitabh Desai, on July 12, 2012.

The message, which was originally obtained by the group Citizens United through a public records request, is partially redacted because it includes foreign government information that has been classified Confidential by the State Department......but was not marked classified by the State Department until this past summer.

Intelligence sources tell the Free Beacon that it would have been classified at the time Mills sent it because foreign government information is considered classified from inception.

The message could add to concerns from congressional and FBI investigators about whether former Secretary Clinton and her aides mishandled classified information while at the State Department.

About half of the forwarded message was redacted due to its classified nature before the State Department released it to Citizens United last month.

Although it is not clear what the redacted section includes, the State Department said in a court motion filed last week that it concerns both foreign government information and critical aspects of U.S. foreign relations, including U.S. foreign activities carried out by officials of the U.S. Government.

The State Department added that the disclosure of this information has the potential to damage and inject friction into our bilateral relationship with African countries whose cooperation is important to U.S. national security.

The Clinton Foundation and the State Department did not respond to request for comment about the email, or say whether Desai...a non-government employee who has worked at the foundation since 2007....would have been authorized to view Confidential information.

---SNIP---

REST AT

http://freebeacon.com/politics/clinton-aide-shared-classified-information-with-foundation-email-shows/

3 posted on 06/07/2016 7:51:03 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

If they kept that up, that could pay off the national debt in only 171 years!!!


4 posted on 06/07/2016 7:52:11 AM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

‘The year’s production is $117,000,000,000 at today’s prices. That’s still small compared to Obama’s profligate deficit spending, but it’s big relative to anything normal.’

I have been thinking, something I rarely do, that the EPA may well have released the polluted water from that gold mine out west because as the dollar drops old mines may well be profitable at todays and future prices. It also got a lot of people who have to move out of the area. Be interesting to see if someone buys that old mine and who it might be.


5 posted on 06/07/2016 7:54:23 AM PDT by Foundahardheadedwoman (God don't have a statute of limitations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
Clinton Foundation's chickens coming home to roost in Haiti?
(Haitians say Billions disappear; Hillary's bro gets Haitian gold mining permit)
American Thinker ^ | 3/21/2015 | Thomas Lifson / FRPosted by GilGil

Haitian activists protested outside of the Clinton Foundation in New York over the loss of “billions of dollars” that was meant to help rebuild after the devastating 2010 earthquake.

The activists are claiming the money was stolen through the Haiti Reconstruction Commission that was headed by Bill Clinton. In January 2015, the Clinton Foundation was the target of protests for wasting more than $10 billion and awarding contracts to non-Haitian companies.

The activists also said Haiti as a cover for foreign governments to funnel kickbacks of hundreds of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation. They believe that this was done for favors that Hillary was doing for the foreign governments while she was Secretary of State.

“We are telling the world of the crimes that Bill and Hillary Clinton are responsible for in Haiti,” said Dhoud Andre of the Committee Against Dictatorship in Haiti. “And we are telling the American people that the over 32,000 emails that Hillary Clinton said she deleted have evidence of the crimes they have committed.” (Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

========================================

Hillary Clinton with Frank Giustra

Hillary Clinton with Frank Giustra (far left), Louise Arbour
and U.S. Ambassador Thomas Pickering (right). CREDIT: Flickr

==============================================

Bill Clinton and gold mining mogul, Frank Giustra, made a big show
of The Clinton Foundation's do-goodism in earthquake-ravaged Haiti.

Bill and Canadian gold mining tycoon Frank Giustra in Haiti June 2014,
to launch the "Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership" Acceso Peanut
Enterprise Corp.
(Hector Retamal/AFP/Getty Images)

REALITY CHECK Then-Secy Hillary supposedly gave Haiti $3.1 billion tax dollars for Earthquake Relief.

But Haitian-American protesters claim that American aid to Haiti was a cover-for foreign governments to funnel kickbacks of hundreds of millions of dollars to The Clinton Foundation.

For example, gold mining expert Giustra "gave" the Foundation $100 million....after Bill helped him make billions off uranium deals. Hillary's brother mysteriously got a rare gold mining license in Haiti (now on hold due to controversy).

6 posted on 06/07/2016 8:05:57 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

Interesting thank you for the post.


7 posted on 06/07/2016 8:07:09 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Hillary and Frank Giustra, left.

Hes a gold mining mogul......he facilitated the takeover of US uranium assets.... he received tax dollars from Hillary's State Dept.

Canadian mining magnate Frank Giustra is one of the Clinton Foundation’s largest donors. Giustra's $100 million contributions go directly:

<><> (1) to the tax-exempt Clinton Foundation, and,

<><> (2) to the Canada-based "Clinton-Giustra Enterprise Partnership."

The "Clinton-Giustra Enterprise Partnership" in turn sends money to the Clinton Foundation...(according to Canadian tax records researched by "Clinton Cash" author Schweizer).

DATA Sources: Clinton Foundation, CGEP (Canada);
Canadian tax records; compiled by Alberto Cuadra and
Rosalind Helderman May 3 at 8:11 PM

ARTICLE LINK http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/wealthy-canadian-helps-fund-the-clinton-foundation/2015/05/03/f855ea22-f1ea-11e4-90bc-afe06f530791_graphic.html

===========================================

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

At the time, both Rosatom and the United States government made promises intended to ease concerns about ceding control of company assets to the Russians. Those promises have been repeatedly broken, records show. (hat tip amorphous)

8 posted on 06/07/2016 8:08:28 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Liz

A small but important correction, Giustra is a resources finance expert, not a Gold miner. His father was apparently a nickel miner but he has always been in investments which, of course requires an expert knowledge of the gold industry but he has never been an operator.


9 posted on 06/07/2016 8:22:15 AM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

Bookmark


10 posted on 06/07/2016 8:26:53 AM PDT by DocRock (And now is the time to fight! Peter Muhlenberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Foundahardheadedwoman

Dewatering the mine and harming adjacent land owners would be small potatos in any redevelopment of the mine and would likely greatly increase the expense to any subsequent mine rehabilitation. Water treatment plant would be required under any scenario.


11 posted on 06/07/2016 8:28:41 AM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Liz
The State Department added that the disclosure of this information has the potential to damage and inject friction into our bilateral relationship with African countries whose cooperation is important to U.S. national security.

For the life of me, I can't think of the slightest reason (other than self-serving assertions by criminals) to consider ANY "bilateral relationship with ANY African country even remotely important to U.S. national security."

What are they gonna do? Refuse to accept the taxpayer billions$ that known U.S. elected criminals throw at them?

12 posted on 06/07/2016 9:29:23 AM PDT by publius911 (IMPEACH HIM NOW evil, stupid, insane ignorant or just clueless, doesn't matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Foundahardheadedwoman

To believe that, you would have to believe that the Obama Regime and a significant number of Obama’s minions inn government are systematically corrupt. What are the chances of that?


13 posted on 06/07/2016 9:32:37 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Somebody who agrees with me 80% of the time is a friend and ally, not a 20% traitor. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
To believe that, you would have to believe that the Obama Regime and a significant number of Obama’s minions inn government are systematically corrupt. What are the chances of that?

100%

14 posted on 06/07/2016 9:42:52 AM PDT by publius911 (IMPEACH HIM NOW evil, stupid, insane ignorant or just clueless, doesn't matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: publius911
Nice deconstruction......Third World countries are entirely dependent on us. We need them like a hole in the head.

And get a load of this: an obscure Baptist Church in Cameroon, Africa gave the Clinton Foundation $10 million. Where does a Baptist church in Africa get $10 million to give to the Clintons? And why?

Cameroon is the recipient of hundreds of millions of grants from the State Dept....earmarked for every social ill imaginable. State Dept monies (our tax dollars) were laundered into the church then back into the Clinton Foundation coffers.

And don’t forget, Hillary’s aide and lawyer-—Cheryl (”I don’t remember”) Mills-—is buying up and developing land and businesses in Sub-Sahara Africa (includes Cameroon).

15 posted on 06/07/2016 9:49:04 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
Thanks for the input.....I know he's been a force in financing b/c he put together the deal to finance the US uranium mines purchase.

B-u-t I didn't make it up.......in all that I've read, Giustra has been described as a gold mining expert----one who has been frequently interviewed on the subject b/c of his expertise.

16 posted on 06/07/2016 9:58:57 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

bkmrk.


17 posted on 06/07/2016 10:11:37 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

I know. I’m making a distinction between operators and financiers. If you put your money in a project, you certainly know a lot about the operation.


18 posted on 06/07/2016 10:29:57 AM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
The NYT report WRT the sell-off of strategic US uranium assets noted that the uranium investors also donated to the Clinton Foundation, as follows:

<><> Canadian Frank Giustra—globe-trotting pal of Bill-—donated $31.3 million and a pledge for $100 million more to the Clinton Foundation. Giustra built a company that later merged with Uranium One. Seems to have facilitated the uranium sell-off.

<><> Canadian Ian Telfer—donated $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation. Mining investor who was chairman of Uranium One when an arm of the Russian government, Rosatom, acquired it.

<><>Paul Reynolds—donated $1 million to $5 million to the Clinton Foundation Adviser on 2007 UrAsia-Uranium One merger. Later helped raise $260 million for the company.

<><>Frank Holmes-—donated $250,000 to $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Chief Executive of U.S. Global Investors Inc., which held $4.7 million in Uranium One shares in the first quarter of 2011.

<><> Canadian Neil Woodyer-—Founded Endeavour Mining with Giustra—donated $50,000 to $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Adviser to Uranium One.

<><> GMP Securities Ltd.-—Donating portion of profits to the Clinton Foundation. Worked on debt issue that raised $260 million for Uranium One. (could also be the money-laundering apparat)

============================================

The NY Times reported the "Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership" collected about $33 million US tax dollars from Hillary's State Dept between 2008 and 2013.....$25 million of which was passed back across the border to the US-based Clinton Foundation.

Giustra then pledged $100 million to the Foundation after Clinton helped him clinch the mega-bucks uranium deal.

ITEM---millions of dollars and 1,100 donors are shrouded in mystery in the Canadian Giustra/Clinton operation. The Clinton Foundation signed a memorandum of understanding with the Obama White House agreeing to reveal its contributors every year. The agreement stipulates that the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative (as the charity was then-known) is part of the Clinton Foundation and must follow the same protocols.

SURPRISE: It hasnt.

Caught w/ his pants down, Giustra/s backtracking like crazy---saying Canadas federal privacy law forbids the Canadian-registered Clinton charity, from revealing its donors.

A memo he provided news organs cites fiduciary obligations to its contributors and Canada’s Personal Information Privacy and Electronic Disclosure Act. “We are not allowed to disclose even to the Clinton Foundation the names of our donors,” Giustra says.

However, Canadian tax and privacy law experts were dubious of the Clinton/Giustra claims. A former director knowledgeable about tax policy at Canada's Department of Finance, said he wasnt aware of any tax laws that would prevent the Clinton charity from releasing its donor names. "There's nothing that would preclude them from releasing donor names. It's entirely up to them. "

19 posted on 06/07/2016 10:40:25 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Curiouser and curiouser...


20 posted on 06/07/2016 2:44:59 PM PDT by OldNewYork (Operation Wetback II, now with computers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson