Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Samsung Launches Enterprise SSD sized at 15 terabyte
guru3d.com ^ | 03/03/2016 | Hilbert Hagedoorn

Posted on 03/03/2016 10:04:15 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

We mentioned these before, and they are for real. Samsung is now shipping the industry's largest solid state drive (SSD) - the "PM1633a," a 15.36 terabyte (TB) drive. 

First revealed at the 2015 Flash Memory Summit in August, the 15.36TB SSD is based on a 12Gb/s Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) interface, for use in enterprise storage systems. Because the PM1633a comes in a 2.5-inch form factor, enterprise storage managers can fit twice as many of the drives in a standard 19-inch, 2U rack, compared to an equivalent 3.5-inch storage drive 

"To satisfy an increasing market need for ultra-high-capacity SAS SSDs from leading enterprise storage system manufacturers, we are directing our best efforts toward meeting our customers' SSD requests," said Jung-bae Lee, Senior Vice President, Memory Product Planning and Application Engineering Team, Samsung Electronics. "We will continue to lead the industry with next-generation SSDs, using our advanced 3D V-NAND memory technology, in order to accelerate the growth of the premium memory market while delivering greater performance and efficiency to our customers."

The unprecedented 15.36TB of data storage on a single SSD is enabled by combining 512 of Samsung's 256Gb V-NAND memory chips. The 256Gb dies are stacked in 16 layers to form a single 512GB package, with a total of 32 NAND flash packages in the 15.36TB drive. Utilizing Samsung's 3rd generation, 256-gigabit (Gb) V-NAND technology which stacks cell-arrays in 48 layers, the PM1633a line-up provides significant performance and reliability upgrades from its predecessor, the PM1633, which used Samsung's 2nd generation, 32-layer, 128Gb V-NAND memory.

Samsung's new PM1633a SSD provides the opportunity for significant improvements in the efficiency of IT system investments through its high storage capacity and exceptional performance. These performance gains stem from Samsung's latest vertical NAND (V-NAND) flash technology, as well as the company's proprietary controller and firmware technology.

The PM1633a SSD sports random read and write speeds of up to 200,000 and 32,000 IOPS respectively, and delivers sequential read and write speeds of up to 1,200MB/s. The random read IOPS performance is approximately 1,000 times that of SAS-type hard disks, while the sequential read and write speeds are over twice those of a typical SATA SSD. Inside the new SSD lie Samsung's advanced controller units that support the 12Gb/s SAS interface, along with a total of 16GB of DRAM. Samsung also uses specially designed firmware that can access large amounts of high-density NAND flash concurrently.

The 15.36TB PM1633a drive supports 1 DWPD (drive writes per day), which means 15.36TB of data can be written every day on this single drive without failure, a level of reliability that will improve cost of ownership for enterprise storage systems. This drive can write from two to ten times as much data as typical SATA SSDs based on planar MLC and TLC NAND flash technologies.

Further, the drive boasts a highly dependable metadata protection mechanism in addition to featuring a data protection and restoration software tool in case of a momentary blackout, which make enterprise systems more stable and manageable.

Starting with the 15.36TB density, Samsung will provide a wide range of capacity options in its PM1633a SSD line-up - 7.68TB, 3.84TB, 1.92TB, 960-gigabyte (GB) and 480GB later this year. With more choices in storage capacity, Samsung is reinforcing the competitiveness in its SAS SSD line-up. The Samsung PM1633a SSD line-up is expected to rapidly become the overwhelming favorite over hard disks for enterprise storage systems.

Um yes, they did not share any pricing ;) It's a bit of a brick but well, thjere you go:


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: hitech

1 posted on 03/03/2016 10:04:16 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Dayem! I remember the DASD I supported was 988 MB and could only get 4 of them into a full size rack. Then we upgrades to EMC Harmonix 3’s and get 10 200 mb units into a rack. That gave us all of 2 gb.


2 posted on 03/03/2016 10:10:47 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (GOPe - Enriching the consultant class while selling out their constituents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce; SunkenCiv

Unreal!


3 posted on 03/03/2016 10:14:12 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
And way back when, my grandad paid five hundred dollars for a 500MB hard drive for the computer he was assembling. And before that, I've seen some old ads for hard drives

 photo great_retro_computer_640_73_zpsb8111416.jpg

4 posted on 03/03/2016 10:18:32 AM PST by SkyDancer ("Nobody Said I Was Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I work for a major company that skimps on back office hard drive/network space and processors. Of course, the whole system collapses every now and then resulting in hundreds of man hours of valuable lost. Technology is cheap it is the people who are expensive.


5 posted on 03/03/2016 10:18:56 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

I remember when a 750 megabyte hard drive was of such note, people from other departments were coming by to admire it. It took 48 hours to format and weighed about 10 pounds.


6 posted on 03/03/2016 10:47:07 AM PST by Roses0508
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
And before that, I've seen some old ads for hard drives

Yeah, that's an old ad (early 1980s?)! Back in 1985 (I think), I bought a 20-Megabyte HD for $400. My boss was pissed off at me, yelling that he paid $500 for his 5-Megabyte HD not long before my purchase. These HDs were huge compared to the floppies we were using. The 5-1/4 floppies went from about 80KB in half a decade later to 1.4MB, puny compared to a HD at 20MB. I think a 100MB HD was about $1000 at the time. I still have a couple 5MB HDs (1982) sitting in my vintage collection, they have a large footprint.

7 posted on 03/03/2016 10:48:18 AM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
LOL....

Memories!

8 posted on 03/03/2016 10:57:11 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
EMC just introduced their new all flash VMAX.

AND they've introduced their new DSSD D5 rack-scale flash platform. Some really nice stuff...to put it mildly.

These new arrays can scale to 53TB of usable capacity, which can be expanded up to a maximum of 500TB in 13TB increments.

9 posted on 03/03/2016 11:09:24 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Why do we give our hearts to the past? And why must we grow up so fast?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: roadcat
I like this one:

 photo daily_picdump_640_88_zps1a026782.jpg

And now a 5TB chip???? WOW.

10 posted on 03/03/2016 12:05:06 PM PST by SkyDancer ("Nobody Said I Was Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Actually, the V-Bricks seem to be what they mentioned in the last line of your post as far as mac capacity and scalability.

The max of the top of the line array of this series seems to be 8 V-Bricks for a total of 4 Petabytes.

11 posted on 03/03/2016 12:34:03 PM PST by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

To be clear the 5tb is a drive. The largest microsd cards, like the picture you showed, are currently in the range of 200gb. Which is still amazing at the size of a fingernail.


12 posted on 03/03/2016 12:56:54 PM PST by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Btw, those 200gb microsd cards sell for $80, which is also crazy, considering what I remember paying for a 200gb hdd not too long ago.


13 posted on 03/03/2016 12:59:37 PM PST by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

In today’s money that $2,500 would be equivalent to around $5,500.


14 posted on 03/03/2016 2:23:03 PM PST by ADemocratNoMore (Jeepers, Freepers, where'd 'ya get those sleepers?. Pj people, exposing old media's lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; ShadowAce; Swordmaker; martin_fierro; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; ...

I want.


15 posted on 03/03/2016 4:29:24 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

I used to work on IBM 3350 and 3380 disk systems. Big giant platters. The principle on these giant systems were no different than the floppy or HD systems on PCs. I wrote machine code to manipulate the read/write heads on 3350s to seek data from cyl/trk/sectors in custom database software. Expensive drives, we lost a few of the newer ones at a mainframe site I ran during the 1989 earthquake and were down almost a week when IBM was scrambling to replace many client’s equipment. Solid state stuff is much more resilient and hardy during earthquakes (but not as much fun).


16 posted on 03/03/2016 6:24:52 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Ars Technica estimates the price at $8k, based on an earlier model costing around $1k per TB and factoring in a discount.
17 posted on 03/03/2016 6:40:15 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

I don’t got back that far, but I definitely remember when HD memory broke the $1/megabyte barrier.

And I recently bought a 5TB external drive for $129. And I can fill it up, too.


18 posted on 03/03/2016 6:44:37 PM PST by PLMerite (The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Gimme!

Note to candidates.

Start giving stuff like this away in exchange for votes. The fed gov should subsidize it, it does every other dumbass idea (and this is the dumbassyist).

This would beat the hell out of Obamaphones.


19 posted on 03/04/2016 10:00:41 AM PST by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson