Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Apple's Tim Cook pushes White House to take stand on encryption
cnet ^ | 1-14-2016 | Katie Collins

Posted on 01/13/2016 1:41:32 PM PST by Citizen Zed

The CEO makes a case for standing against the use of back doors, or intentional security vulnerabilities that let law enforcement poke into your private information.

It seems Apple CEO Tim Cook isn't shy about doling out advice to the Obama administration.

Cook is reportedly unhappy with the White House's unwillingness to take a stance on encryption, or the scrambling of emails and other messages to keep them private. According to The Intercept, he made his concerns clear to a high-level delegation of officials during a meeting in San Jose, California, last week, asking the administration to issue a statement defending the use of unbreakable encryption.

At the center of the debate is the use of back doors. These intentional openings coded into software let law enforcement officials bypass security measures and get at your data. The FBI and some administration officials argue that the tech industry should put such back doors in place so law enforcement can access communications between terrorists and protect national security. But the industry is fighting back, in part because they're afraid hackers could exploit those same back doors.

At a meeting to discuss counterterrorism, attended by representatives from companies including Facebook, Twitter, Google, DropBox, Microsoft and LinkedIn, Cook told White House officials they should state publicly "no back doors."

Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Firms such as Facebook and Google are widely known to comply with legal requests from police and security agencies to help tackle serious crime and terrorism. Over the past few years, they've attempted to be more transparent about how many of these requests they receive and comply with. When it comes to encryption though, the tech industry is keen to show that it's putting users first, and it's been steadfast in its refusal to introduce vulnerabilities into otherwise impenetrable systems.

As for the White House, its position on encryption is less clear. Attorney General Loretta Lynch reportedly responded to Cook by saying there needed to be "balance" between privacy and national security.

The issue isn't going away. Last September the White House decided not to seek a legislative fix to deal with the increased use of encryption by the tech industry. A Washington Post report, however, quoted an email from the US intelligence community's top lawyer as saying the administration should be "keeping our options open."


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: apple; encryption; timcook
The one thing going for Apple.
1 posted on 01/13/2016 1:41:32 PM PST by Citizen Zed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

“in part because they’re afraid hackers could exploit those same back doors”

Not could, would. There is a 100% probability that if backdoors were built into encryption standards, they would be found and exploited. No matter how long it would take to find them, the reward is so great that it would justify any expense and effort to ferret them out.

It would not be limited to hackers either. Every foreign government on the planet that can afford an intelligence apparatus would be trying to find those backdoors as well, so this would compromise our domestic security in a very fundamental way that would outweigh any potential benefits.


2 posted on 01/13/2016 2:06:32 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Looks good. Won't last. Even if it did, he's still a straight-ticket Demwit, and will use every resource available to push their agenda.

3 posted on 01/13/2016 2:08:14 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

"Attorney General Loretta Lynch reportedly responded to Cook by saying there needed to be "balance" between privacy and national security."


4 posted on 01/13/2016 2:08:57 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

"Death to America!"


5 posted on 01/13/2016 2:09:07 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
I'll bet Tim Cook won't be running Apple in a Year.

Apple has used up Steve Jobs ideas

6 posted on 01/13/2016 2:10:34 PM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

The suitcases full of cash method works wonders for finding those “secret” back doors, especially if you’re a governmental actor.


7 posted on 01/13/2016 2:13:50 PM PST by AustinBill (consequence is what makes our choices real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

Apple under Cook is not the same. Like you said the visionary ideas Jobs had seem to have run out with nothing new to replace it.


8 posted on 01/13/2016 2:15:09 PM PST by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

If DOJ takes down Apple on backdoor encryption, everything is done.
Right now they are the only ones fighting the US Gov.
Not Intel, not Google, not Microsoft.


9 posted on 01/13/2016 2:23:07 PM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

Nah, he’ll be running it until he dies of AIDS.


10 posted on 01/13/2016 3:02:16 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
There is a 100% probability that if backdoors were built into encryption standards, they would be found and exploited. No matter how long it would take to find them, the reward is so great that it would justify any expense and effort to ferret them out.

I give it a month, tops. The government's security against "inside man" leaks is pitiful, and for every Snowden who makes great personal sacrifices to reveal the government's dirty deeds for principled reasons there are dozens of others who would gladly sell a backdoor key for personal profit.

11 posted on 01/20/2016 3:39:58 AM PST by Gandalf the Mauve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson