Posted on 12/30/2015 1:30:57 PM PST by presidio9
Jesse Watters not on BOR tonight—I bet he was bumped because he was too conservative for Fox.
That "1990's news cycle" that you disregard is the most public evidence of the continuum of Clinton criminality. We are faced with Hillary becoming the Democrat candidate in an election controlled by the press & local Democrat vote counters.
ALL BECAUSE people like you, "for one, don't care"!
Bribery by Tyson Foods via the Cattle Futures should have sent them both to prison, but people like you, "for one, don't care".
Whitewater real estate scam should have sent them both to prison, but people like you, "for one, don't care".
Travelgate should have sent them both to prison, but people like you, "for one, don't care".
700 FBI files should have sent them both to prison, but people like you, "for one, don't care".
Vince Foster's suicide/murder should have sent them both to prison, but people like you, "for one, don't care".
Do you begin to see a pattern?
Wink, wink, nod, nod because "it was only sex" or the usual political enrichment let both Clintons to (rightly) assume that they can get away with anything - murder, high treason, bribery in the millions by foreign governments.
Too bad Barney Fife wasn't around in Arkansas in the '70s to "nip it in the bud".
Or the people, like you, "for one, (did) care" and would have sent them both to prison long ago.
“Like Bill Cosby, BJ Clinton likes puddin. Puddin his weiner where it doesn’t belong”
That’s funny. I’m busting a gut here.
Elections are won or lost in the present. What do people care about right now? Terrorism, immigration and the economy. Hillary can be slammed on all three as Sec of State, on her current stances and on current Democrat policies.
I haven’t seen any polls where people mentioned an old story about Whitewater or Bill Clinton’s zipper problem as something that concerns them or their families in this election.
The average voter wants to know what people running for office will do for them now as President, not what happened three administrations ago that they vaguely remember as being covered in 1996.
All the focus on non-current events deflects from where the current focus should be and that is terrorism, immigration and the economy. The things that voters will decide the election on.
At the time the Left was pushing, hard, a variation of sexual abuse based on power differential.
Sexual activity, by their standards, could not be consensual if there was a power differential between those engaging in sexual activity. Basically a low-level female employee, even if an adult, really couldn’t consent to sexual activity with a superior or someone more powerful than she. By this definition the sexual activity was assault and/or rape.
Then the President of the United States got caught engaging in sexual activity with an intern. All the “power differential” talk stopped. Immediately.
My question - what is the cutoff number before we are allowed to believe that women making accusations are being truthful - with Cosby, twenty or so finally seemed to do the trick - with Clinton a dozen or so still doesn’t seem sufficient......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.