Posted on 12/08/2015 7:00:03 PM PST by o_1_2_3__
Drudge link -- can't post article.
Google is an evil company.
I guess the First Amendment doesn’t apply to da internet. It’s a commie thing.
He should start by censoring the crude language on his own Youtube website. At least make it an option.
I simply hate it when these geniuses over shoot their intended target and hit each other in the rear...
Probably part of their deal with Communist China
So, who is going to define “hate speech”?
Schmidt is a moocher deadbeat who is dragged along by his old buddies from SUN who were original investors in Google.
He basically was a plant put there by them to make sure Page and Brin knew who was boss. As a manager, he’s destroyed virtually everything he touched: remember Novell?
And the Google founders threw him out as soon as they grew up a bit and figured out what a fraud he is.
But he still gets paid and since he’s a nasty piece of work, he pops up and shows us what kind of jerk he really is.
Try searching for something nasty about Obama , I bet that stuff has already vanished
Probably the same folks who dreamed up “safe spaces” and “cisgender”..
Not politically correct things are defined as hate by the left.
This smears the dissenters as irrational AND incapable of a rational reason for their alternative view.
Now they want to ban “hate speech”, which means anything that isn’t lockstep with liberal orthodoxy.
End result? Fascism in the name of feeling good.
And it leads to the Soviet era solution of labeling dissenters as crazy; they were sent to mental institutions without even needing a trial, stigmatized when released, tortured with drugs and physical punishments as “crazy” ... and liberals are already putting out lots of studies saying conservatives are crazy, in addition to already being defined as stupid and evil.
During the last presidential election I tried to look up stories on Obama and the first 2-3 pages were all pro-Obama.
Control the information = control the narrative.
It’s a unique form of censorship and thought control.
Well, If it only addresses hate speech toward Muslims, blacks, and homos, I guess that would be OK, then.
Yes, they are. So are the rest of social media owners. They want control of us.
Actually, I’ve met him several times. He was CTO of SUN and after that (while at Novell) was on the board of directors for Siebel Systems (where i worked.) Novell was extremely upset when he left for Google and I think even tried to sue. He’s a incredibly smart man. Not sure I agree with him politically or agree with his moral failings (stuff I know about him), but he’s respected.
He goes to the Bildeberg Meetings every year. So he get’s his marching orders from TPTB and executes. As long as he gets money and women, he’s probably exactly like a lot of politicians, will do and say whatever is needed.
Why not an internet filter for google, huffpo, NYT, etc? They are not compatible with the 1st Ammendment.
As it they haven't already.
Also, for the last few years, the google algorithm has choked out grassroots conservative sites, and benefited liberal corporate sites.
Facebook has also created a completely rigged game. You can see in their "trending" links, which are almost all geared to a liberal point of view.
They've created a liberal vehicle that at the same times drives conservatism into a virtual ghetto.
Good. I will short the hell out of google stock and make a killing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.