Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can science prove Adam and Eve were real?
Fox News ^ | Nov. 04, 2015 - 5:38 | Fox News

Posted on 11/05/2015 2:03:48 AM PST by WhiskeyX

Can science prove Adam and Eve were real? Spirited Debate: Dr. Fazal Rana and Dr. Hugh Ross believe religion and science can prove how life began

(Excerpt) Read more at video.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Books/Literature; Religion; Science
KEYWORDS: adam; creation; eve; evolution; fazalrana; hughross; religion; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 11/05/2015 2:03:48 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

Good luck finding their bones. Of course we know why the article was written. It has nothing to do with trying to find out if Adam and Eve ever existed. Hell we can’t even find our ancestors nack a thousands except on rare occassion and that’s only if records were kept and you kow where to search. No. Its about creating doubt about the Bible and God. Nothing more. Its a progressive liberal trying to be “clever” using Alinskyish techniques once again. But if they did happen to find a gravestone with “here lies Adam of Eden” they’d never show us anyway. They’d probably relay the coordinates to ISIS for demolation.


2 posted on 11/05/2015 2:11:27 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

^ demolation = demolition


3 posted on 11/05/2015 2:12:04 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX
Spirited Debate: Dr. Fazal Rana and Dr. Hugh Ross believe religion and science can prove how life began

Liberal SINOs (Scientists in name only) are unwilling to even state when life BEGINS with evidence and case history all around them every day.

4 posted on 11/05/2015 2:14:45 AM PST by a fool in paradise (The goal of Socialism is Communism. Marx and Lenin were in agreement on this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris; metmom; fishtank; Iscool; boatbums; Gamecock; CynicalBear

Ping


5 posted on 11/05/2015 2:16:23 AM PST by StoneWall Brigade (MARANATHA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

In a word, no — unless their burials can be found, complete with gravestones; finding the original site of Eden would also be a nice touch. So far, bupkis.


6 posted on 11/05/2015 2:40:49 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

The Black Sea covered a multitude of sins.


7 posted on 11/05/2015 2:46:10 AM PST by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

Hey, we use the term “Sea of Color”. ;’)


8 posted on 11/05/2015 2:52:35 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

LOL! I like “Euxine” too.

But then I like “Mahometan.”


9 posted on 11/05/2015 2:55:18 AM PST by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

They might be able to prove what parts of our genetic code have a common root.


10 posted on 11/05/2015 3:08:47 AM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; MUDDOG

Seems the spot between the Tigris and Euphrates River where two other rivers might have joined is under the Persian gulf at this time as sea levels rose.

The whole Black Sea deal when the Mediterranean spilled over the Bosphorus was part of same sea level rise back 7600 years, or so, ago.


11 posted on 11/05/2015 3:09:13 AM PST by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Good point!

The melting of the last ice age really wasn’t very long ago.


12 posted on 11/05/2015 3:12:31 AM PST by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

The Flood would have wiped away their graves and changed the landscape so much that all attempts to discover the “source” of mankind is always going to be confusing and contradictory.


13 posted on 11/05/2015 3:14:06 AM PST by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

I’ve read before that by analyzing DNA and mutation rates from human populations around the world, there is some evidence that all humans are descendants of a single common female ancestor.

The female ancestor would have lived about 250,000 years ago according to that study. (And yes, I know that the single common ancestor will please biblical literalists, but the dating will not).


14 posted on 11/05/2015 3:49:55 AM PST by CaptainMorgantown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

Personally, I don’t need scientific proof..

God said it.

I’m not surprised that the truth of God’ Word would be confirmed once the genome was mapped and the scientific understanding of God”s creation was better understood.

I belied in a literal Adam and Eve, a literal 6-day creation, that Jesus Christ is Lord, and that he is coming again to judge the living and the dead.

I don’t doubt it.


15 posted on 11/05/2015 3:55:19 AM PST by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001; GodGunsGuts; Fichori; tpanther; Gordon Greene; Ethan Clive Osgoode; betty boop; ...

No kidding.


16 posted on 11/05/2015 3:56:22 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer

What *scientists* and *evolutionists* like to do is say that since we can’t *prove* our claims, we must accept their theories because they are *scientific*. IOW, since there is no alternative to something they claim they disproved, and theirs is the only other option out there, it must be true.

Problem is, they can’t *prove* theirs either. Scientists tell us constantly that you can’t disprove a theory, you can only disprove it, but then demand that creationists *prove* the creationist position is correct.

They demand that we do what they won’t do themselves.

So let them do what they demand of us.

We claim creationsism. They can disprove it.


17 posted on 11/05/2015 4:11:11 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CaptainMorgantown

Her husband was Genghis Khan Sr........


18 posted on 11/05/2015 4:57:16 AM PST by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

Genetically speaking, it is very possible and no geneticist can say that it is an impossible idea.


19 posted on 11/05/2015 6:18:22 AM PST by Marko413
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom
The existence of Adam and Eve is far beyond the competence of Science to establish.

Thanks for the BEEP!

20 posted on 11/05/2015 9:26:39 AM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson