Skip to comments.Can science prove Adam and Eve were real?
Posted on 11/05/2015 2:03:48 AM PST by WhiskeyX
Can science prove Adam and Eve were real? Spirited Debate: Dr. Fazal Rana and Dr. Hugh Ross believe religion and science can prove how life began
(Excerpt) Read more at video.foxnews.com ...
Good luck finding their bones. Of course we know why the article was written. It has nothing to do with trying to find out if Adam and Eve ever existed. Hell we can’t even find our ancestors nack a thousands except on rare occassion and that’s only if records were kept and you kow where to search. No. Its about creating doubt about the Bible and God. Nothing more. Its a progressive liberal trying to be “clever” using Alinskyish techniques once again. But if they did happen to find a gravestone with “here lies Adam of Eden” they’d never show us anyway. They’d probably relay the coordinates to ISIS for demolation.
^ demolation = demolition
Liberal SINOs (Scientists in name only) are unwilling to even state when life BEGINS with evidence and case history all around them every day.
In a word, no — unless their burials can be found, complete with gravestones; finding the original site of Eden would also be a nice touch. So far, bupkis.
The Black Sea covered a multitude of sins.
Hey, we use the term “Sea of Color”. ;’)
LOL! I like “Euxine” too.
But then I like “Mahometan.”
They might be able to prove what parts of our genetic code have a common root.
Seems the spot between the Tigris and Euphrates River where two other rivers might have joined is under the Persian gulf at this time as sea levels rose.
The whole Black Sea deal when the Mediterranean spilled over the Bosphorus was part of same sea level rise back 7600 years, or so, ago.
The melting of the last ice age really wasn’t very long ago.
The Flood would have wiped away their graves and changed the landscape so much that all attempts to discover the “source” of mankind is always going to be confusing and contradictory.
I’ve read before that by analyzing DNA and mutation rates from human populations around the world, there is some evidence that all humans are descendants of a single common female ancestor.
The female ancestor would have lived about 250,000 years ago according to that study. (And yes, I know that the single common ancestor will please biblical literalists, but the dating will not).
Personally, I don’t need scientific proof..
God said it.
I’m not surprised that the truth of God’ Word would be confirmed once the genome was mapped and the scientific understanding of God”s creation was better understood.
I belied in a literal Adam and Eve, a literal 6-day creation, that Jesus Christ is Lord, and that he is coming again to judge the living and the dead.
I don’t doubt it.
What *scientists* and *evolutionists* like to do is say that since we can’t *prove* our claims, we must accept their theories because they are *scientific*. IOW, since there is no alternative to something they claim they disproved, and theirs is the only other option out there, it must be true.
Problem is, they can’t *prove* theirs either. Scientists tell us constantly that you can’t disprove a theory, you can only disprove it, but then demand that creationists *prove* the creationist position is correct.
They demand that we do what they won’t do themselves.
So let them do what they demand of us.
We claim creationsism. They can disprove it.
Her husband was Genghis Khan Sr........
Genetically speaking, it is very possible and no geneticist can say that it is an impossible idea.
Thanks for the BEEP!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.