Posted on 09/30/2015 10:13:13 AM PDT by pabianice
This is the beginning of the campaign to invade and occupy Saudi Arabia. Russia will take Riyahd and Medina, and leave Mecca to the Iranians.
Bookmark this and bet on it. Before Christmas 2015.
LMAO....OMGosh...best post of the day!!! LMAO.....
[ Im gonna bet Putins next move will be to get OUR hostages released by Iran. ]
If I were Putin, I would do this for two reasons.
1. it would Rub Obama’s nose in the pile of crap he left in the middle east and Humiliate him to the whole world.
2. It would buy cheap PR which Putin could use to do to get more leverage over what he wants to do in Syria.
According to Lib-tards, It isn’t surrender if you use a different word.
It sounded like an ungood or even made-up word so I checked the Oxford dictionary:
deconflict
Line breaks: de|con|flict
Pronunciation:
Definition of deconflict in English:
verb
[WITH OBJECT] Military
Reduce the risk of collision between (aircraft, airborne weaponry, etc.) in an area by coordinating their movements.
And that reminded me a joke told by Germans in the last year or two of WWII.
“The Americans airplanes are silver. The British planes are blue. In his wisdom, the Fuehrer has had our planes painted with invisibility paint so they cannot be seen.”
Why is this a problem? Are we concerned about Rooskie planes colliding?
Obama Admin is not a Government , it’s a Freak Show
Do you really believe that Putin's primary reason for going into Syria is to defeat ISIS?
Putin is in Syria to keep the Assad regime in power and to restore Russian influence in the region. Russia and Iran are working together to keep their ally, Assad, in charge so their strategic national interests are served.
I doubt Russia will be going into Iraq or anywhere else to defeat ISIS.
Well, the definition stipulates friendly organizations. I am not so sure that appropriately describes the US and Russia.
Shrinkage!
LOL!
“He basically got where he was by being a mental dildo for the Liberal Media.”
Your whole comment is such a sadly accurate excellent analogy.
Also truly sad is how many have died around the whole world for the sake of a complete fraud, an interloper with an agenda to destroy what was once so great, just for the sake of some kind of man made arrogant kind of justice.
This is truly evil.
Thanks. I have been pondering for a few years how best to describe Obama's success in politics. I finally came up with that as the most accurate description of what happened.
Lazy, ignorant, stupid, incompetent, petulant, mouthy Obama was only launched to success because of his utility as a mental dildo for Liberal minds.
His success was just a form of "jungle fever."
I am fully in favor of deconflicting things with a B-52....worked in Japan, will work here too.
Yeah, but he's working on his legacy.....and democrats will honor, respect, adore, admire, beatify, sanctify this nitwit because he meets all the requirements to be a democrat.
you wasted 5 keystrokes...the /sarc
HEY, that will be the limit, we will yell real loud and threaten to draw a red line and will file a real strong message with the U.N.
That will set them straight!!!
So Obama would get all wee-wee'd up about that?
What happens if the Russians shoot down an American fighter?
>>>>>
HEY, that will be the limit, we will yell real loud and threaten to draw a red line and will file a real strong message with the U.N.
That will set them straight!!!
<<<<<<<<
And trade the pilot for 5 of the terrorists in Gitmo.
The first time, YES, the second time was because so called Republicans sat on their collective asses and didn't vote at all. Romney was a RINO, or Romney was a (shudder)Mormon, or Romney was too liberal, or Romney was some other excuse to give away an election that by any measure was theirs to win....PATHETIC IS THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!!!!!!!!!!!!
Deconflicting the overseas contingency operation so there won’t be a man caused disaster. We sure have come a long way in 7 years. I don’t recognize the country I live in and now we’re speaking a language foreign to me.
“..Do you really believe that Putin’s primary reason for going into Syria is to defeat ISIS?..”
No. Never did. My point was that the whole situation, of which ISIS is a big part, could have been prevented if it had been handled by Obama correctly. ISIS would never have come into existence along with all of its horror stories and destruction.
Yes, Putin is there to take advantage of the situation opened up by a weak and dysfunctional Obama. Exactly what they are doing. As you note, Russia could not care less about ISIS. It is about power, control, oil, presence, etc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.