Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Orders Water Bottling Company to Stop Tapping Sierra Nevada Spring Water
NBC Bay Area ^

Posted on 09/02/2015 8:50:18 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Sugar Pine Spring Water in the foothills of Tuolumne County also faces fines of nearly $225,000

Armed with evidence captured by surveillance cameras, California regulators have ordered a business to stop tapping Sierra Nevada spring water that is later bottled and sold in stores, officials said Wednesday.

It would be the first such action taken this year against a commercial water bottling business under tight drought restrictions, said Kathy Mrowka, enforcement manager of the state Water Resources Control Board.

Sugar Pine Spring Water in the foothills of Tuolumne County also faces fines of nearly $225,000 for collecting and trucking the water to commercial bottling companies for two years despite notices to stop, according to the proposed sanctions by the state Water Resources Control Board.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcbayarea.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Local News
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/02/2015 8:50:18 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

They don’t need the private-sector jobs.


2 posted on 09/02/2015 8:54:34 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I’ll bet the bottling company could get Hanoi Boi the Nuke Dealer to make a “deal” for them with the state.


3 posted on 09/02/2015 8:59:23 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Cecil the Lion says, Stop the Slaughter of the Baby Humans!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
maxresdefault.jpg
4 posted on 09/02/2015 9:00:21 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Well, the OBVIOUS answer to this is that they haven’t been paying California Democrats ENOUGH MONEY to keep approval, unlike Nestle’.


5 posted on 09/02/2015 9:25:39 PM PDT by tcrlaf (They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

No mention of going after golf courses


6 posted on 09/03/2015 3:15:48 AM PDT by dc27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

“Well, the OBVIOUS answer to this is that they haven’t been paying California Democrats ENOUGH MONEY to keep approval, unlike Nestle’.”

Yeah, I thought about Nestle, too, when I was reading the article. They take vast quantities of water for their business. I’m sure you’re correct that money buys silence for Nestle.


7 posted on 09/03/2015 5:03:58 AM PDT by MNGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

22 acre feet. Is that all?
Fines of $1.5 million and counting. The 22 homes that the water would supply a family of 4 for 1 year pays what for their water? Maybe $80 a month? 80 x 6 months x 22 = $10,560 for 170 days of water.

So how can they give such a huge fine for so little water?

FTA: One acre-foot is the volume of water sufficient to cover an acre of land to a depth of one foot, enough water to sustain a typical California household of four for one year.


8 posted on 09/03/2015 11:34:57 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson