|
"Hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre / mod sceal þe mare, þe ure mægen lytlað." "Thought must be the harder, heart be the keener / mind must be the greater, as our might lessens." |
   |
Posted on 08/12/2015 5:15:17 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
Hillary's claim that information on her server wasn't classified at the time she received it but became classified LATER is 100% PURE HOGWASH.
Information that is classified is usually DEclassified at a later date, or 'OADR' (Originating Agency Determine on Review). Some classified data is forever classified, but rarely (HOW ABOUT NEVER?) does information that is UNclassifed BECOME classified at a later date!
maybe allowing for changing security status is why you’re supposed to use a government server you brakn-dead bitch!!
She could be the only SOS in history to never handle classified material.
brakn-dead s/b brain-dead
Technically, she is correct. But only because, as Secretary of State, she was the Classifying AUTHORITY and wasn’t doing her JOB.
Don’t hold your breath waiting for the MSM to point this out.
This is Hillary’s only argument. She is a cabinet level official and she DOESN’T KNOW those emails were Top Secret? If THAT excuse flys with voters the country is dead.
Almost ALL of her MISSING (Yes I said MISSING, think “18 minute gap”) emails just before and during the time of Benghazi would DEFINITELY have been CLASSIFIED. Most DEFINITELY. Perhaps THAT is why she DELETED them, save to mention the ‘staged hostage-taking of Stevens on behalf of her BFF Mohammed Morsi’ thing.
You will have to explain this IN SPANISH to most of her voters in 2016 the minute they get off their government-furnished commuter van at the polls.
That is correct. The creator of classified information is supposed to choose the classification. That is usually inferred from the source if the information is a synthesis of existing material, and from the definitions and guidelines if the material is an entirely new creation. As Secretary of State, she could argue that she mishandled her responsibilities for choosing the proper classification rather than mishandling classified materials. I'm not sure that is any better politically.
|
"Hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre / mod sceal þe mare, þe ure mægen lytlað." "Thought must be the harder, heart be the keener / mind must be the greater, as our might lessens." |
|
|
We’re seeing the beginning of the end. The interesting part is this would be big news anyway. That she is a serious presidential candidate makes it historic.
What difference does it make? /s
hahaha.. what a great video... I can’t imagine how much time it took her to read through the 30,000 emails she decided were personal.. All it would take is to question whoever it was who actually did the sorting to know that they spent probably an hour per 1000 emails to sort..
BS, The security administrator for the state department was the classifying authority. This Bitch did or did not sign off on the quarterly security briefings, that is the question. Subpoena the records and the security administrator. It’s long since past she was in jail. The evidence is there without even seeing documents. A non government thumb drive is the smoking gun.
The FEDS were more aggressive with Gibson Guitar Company (no doubt a security risk of the highest order) than with Quisling Clinton. Kind of funny, isn’t it?
CHAPTER 37—ESPIONAGE AND CENSORSHIP
793. Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
Hildebeeste is lying through her rotten teeth.
She’ll probably say she is not a he so couldn’t report to her (”his”) superior.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
