Skip to comments.
Megyn Kelly Insists She Didn’t “Attack” Trump At Debate (Bunk, you should apologize Megyn)
WebProNews ^
| August 12, 2015
| Lacy Langley
Posted on 08/12/2015 10:05:51 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
Megyn Kelly continues to defend her line of questions that was directed at Donald Trump during last week’s debate.
As one of the moderators for the debate, Megyn Kelly was tasked with lobbing the questions at the potential candidates, but some say she zeroed in on Trump from the beginning.
http://www.webpronews.com/megyn-kelly-insists-she-didnt-attack-trump-at-debate-2015-08
(Excerpt) Read more at webpronews.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 2016debates; bimbo; denial; foxnews; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Megyn, you goofed. Badly.
You goofed.
You were not supposted to pick sides. You owe Donald an apology.
Big time.
To: Cringing Negativism Network
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Looks like Megyn gonna have to do another T&A shoot for GQ to get back her numbers. She sure as hell doesn’t have me as one of her viewers.
3
posted on
08/12/2015 10:07:22 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Megyn is a disgrace to real independent liberated women. Real independent liberated women don't fall back on gal stuff meant to be intimidating when they don't get their way.
JMHO
4
posted on
08/12/2015 10:09:18 AM PDT
by
grania
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Apology accepted when the FIRST QUESTION she asks Hillary is” Your husband has been accused of assault and even rape on numerous occasions; How can you justify remaining married to him and how can he justify being married to you?”
5
posted on
08/12/2015 10:10:24 AM PDT
by
Cyman
(We have to pass it to see what's in it= definition of stool sample)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
6
posted on
08/12/2015 10:11:00 AM PDT
by
Old Sarge
(I prep because DHS and FEMA told me it was a good idea...)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
She was bragging and gloating before the debate that no one would dodge her questions. You could see the evil in her eyes.
7
posted on
08/12/2015 10:11:20 AM PDT
by
Kenny
To: Cringing Negativism Network
"What is God saying, Cruz?
Establishment shills...
8
posted on
08/12/2015 10:11:42 AM PDT
by
Jan_Sobieski
(Sanctification)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
I just wish everyone would let this drop on both sides of the argument. This is taking entirely too much attention off of more important matters. We need to get back to Trumps message, and let it spread like wildfire. We shouldn’t let people become distracted from what is truly important.
9
posted on
08/12/2015 10:11:43 AM PDT
by
jasbd1985
To: Gaffer
Looks like Megyn gonna have to do another T&A shoot for GQ to get back her numbers.The only way I'm 'coming' back is for a full beaver and I'm only staying until the beaver splashes.
Don't let your evil minds cloud what I'm talking about, I'm referring to the animal, not the whatever...
10
posted on
08/12/2015 10:12:05 AM PDT
by
USS Alaska
(Exterminate the terrorist savages, everywhere.)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Those were not questions, they were charges. “How do you plead?” was the question.
11
posted on
08/12/2015 10:12:22 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
To: Cyman
None of our business why she’s still married to Bill. A question along the same vein would be using your premise and then ...how can you say you’re a champion for women when you savaged the women who were victimized by your husband?
To: Cringing Negativism Network
13
posted on
08/12/2015 10:12:53 AM PDT
by
Bobalu
(If we live to see 2017 we will be kissing the ground)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Technically she attacked him before the debate. With that “Trump Raped His Wife” tabloid trash breaking news story.
14
posted on
08/12/2015 10:13:00 AM PDT
by
McGruff
(Trump/Cruz 2016 - My Dream Team)
To: Kenny
Yep. She was giddy with joy over the debate.
Kelly would be a better fit for a small rural TV station.
If I were Ailes, I would tell her to shut up.
15
posted on
08/12/2015 10:13:57 AM PDT
by
tennmountainman
("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance.)
To: USS Alaska
Wutchoo be tawkin' 'bout?
16
posted on
08/12/2015 10:14:13 AM PDT
by
NorthMountain
("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Why doesn’t she just shut up.
17
posted on
08/12/2015 10:14:23 AM PDT
by
miss marmelstein
(Richard the Third: I'd like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
To: Cringing Negativism Network
She needs to quit while she’s behind. :-)
18
posted on
08/12/2015 10:14:57 AM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: USS Alaska
....not the whatever... Now you MUST agree there is some controversy whether that is "whatever" or "wherever".......:0)
19
posted on
08/12/2015 10:15:14 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: Cringing Negativism Network
I thought this was over. Why doesn't she take her smartass snark back to
the studio and STHU already?
20
posted on
08/12/2015 10:15:43 AM PDT
by
MaxMax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson