Posted on 08/05/2015 7:08:09 PM PDT by NKP_Vet
Ultimate Fighting Championship Star Ronda Rousey improved her undefeated record with an amazing 30-second victory over Bethe Correia Saturday night, but “social justice” warriors were quick to remind Twitter users that she’s not PC-approved.
Focusing in on comments Rousey made about a transgender fighter participating in female divisions, the PC police flocked to Twitter in an effort to steal the spotlight from her impressive win.
In 2014, Rousey expressed concern that athletes who were born male might have an unfair advantage in women’s divisions after Fallon Fox, a fellow MMA fighter, came out as transgender.
“She can try hormones, chop her pecker off, but it’s still the same bone structure a man has,” Rousey said in 2014, according to SB Nation. “It’s an advantage. I don’t think it’s fair.”
Concern that Fox – who had a TKO over Tamikka Brents in 2014 that left Brents with a broken orbital bone, concussion, and staples in her head – might have an unfair advantage because of her biologically male characteristics left Rousey labeled as “transphobic.”
A sin apparently too great for the left to let go of.
You don’t know the half of it. My bud also trains in the same gym she trains in Glendale near us and she’s more in tune to what us Freepers believe in than what people think ;)
I knew there was a reason why I liked this woman..I had a feeling she might be a Conservative..I dare any liberal loon to try to attack her, she will literally kick their a@@ in less than 5 seconds
AHEM....Thread no good without Pics.
She is correct. Men have larger tubercles on their bones where muscle attaches, synonymous to creating a longer lever arm. This enables greater torque or rotational force upon the extremity than a female would generally have.
In addition apes and chimps have larger tubercles than men. This is one reason that explains why a skinny armed chimp can exert greater force than a muscular looking man
She had a boyfriend, another MMA fighter, who broke up with her and claimed “domestic abuse”. She beat the hell out of him. He said in statements he tried to defend himself but it was no contest. Now that’s funny.
Thank you so very much. I will dance at your wedding!
I haven’t seen a picture in which she had any visible ink.
That is automatic extra points in the looks rating for me.
Nice gluts too
I would pay good money to see her beat the crap out of the trans.
Now THAT is funny!!
She said something that was common sense. Leftists are outraged. lol.
yes it is
She was also interviewed and was asked did she think women fighters got a raw deal and no respect because the top male fighters get paid more than them. Specifically asked about Roger Mayweather getting 50 million for a fight and she gets in the neighborhood of a million, she said “I have no problem with the money I’m paid and I don’t discuss it, but Roger gets that kind of money because he’s had 50 fights and never lost, and if one day I have a record like his I will probably get that much money”.
This gal is the real deal. The libs despise her because she does not whine and she speaks the truth.
Roger? I think they meant Floyd Jr. Roger Mayweather is in his 50s and hasn’t fought since 1999.
You didn't see the tat on her left wrist in Post #7. She's got a few tats. But I agree, no tats is much more attractive.
. I love Rhonda and think that she probably could defeat a male opponent, but the possibility of being seriously hurt for the sake of proving a point is a risk she should avoid.
She has nothing to prove.
Not guilty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.