Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How likely is nuclear war with Russia?
Vox ^ | July 6, 2015 | Max Fisher

Posted on 07/07/2015 6:43:26 AM PDT by Sam's Army

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: central_va

“No way. Why didn’t LBJ drop the big one on the NV gooks?”

Wasn’t a declared war—is my guess? Goldwater wanted to bomb them into the stone age tho. MacArthur wanted to drop nukes on the Chi-coms in Korea.

I think we would have nuked Berlin to tell the Russians “look what we have”. But the war ended too “soon”. Of course, it’s all speculation at this point.


21 posted on 07/07/2015 7:41:05 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
Not likely for the next couple of years. Our current president wouldn’t shoot back.

Then wouldn't this be the best time for them to attack?

Dave Wilkerson (author of Cross & the Switchblade) prophesied in '73 that Russia would eventually attack us with nuclear missiles, and that we would not respond.

22 posted on 07/07/2015 8:08:01 AM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sam's Army
Facts to consider:

1. Our strategic forces and nuclear arsenal are a mere shadows of themselves compared to the Cold War, and I strongly suspect their reliability is highly questionable.

2. Russia and China have been continually moderizing and upgrading their strategic weapons systems and forces. What have we done?

3. You have to have a 'National Command Authority' that is decisive and willing to fight back. 0bama and his yes-men, panty-waist "generals" don't fit that criteria.

23 posted on 07/07/2015 8:15:20 AM PDT by 21st Century Crusader (August 26, 1191)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

I’m reading SECRETS OF STATE by Michael Palmer. Makes a pretty good case for Pakistan as the most likely source for terrorists to get hold of a bomb.


24 posted on 07/07/2015 8:57:00 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: central_va

The Vietnam war was not WWII.


25 posted on 07/07/2015 10:11:54 AM PDT by ansel12 (libertarians have always been for gay marriage and polygamy, gay Scout leaders, gay military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

All the more reason to drop it. With no possible retaliation. It would have saved 50k lives.


26 posted on 07/07/2015 10:13:43 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: central_va

How goofy.

Show the world that we are nuke crazy nuts, and nuke a country supported at the time by Red China and the Soviet Union, and on China’s border.


27 posted on 07/07/2015 10:31:21 AM PDT by ansel12 (libertarians have always been for gay marriage and polygamy, gay Scout leaders, gay military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: central_va

And for more goofiness, what in the world does that have to with Germany in WWII, in nuking Germany, there would truly have not been any retaliation.


28 posted on 07/07/2015 10:33:26 AM PDT by ansel12 (libertarians have always been for gay marriage and polygamy, gay Scout leaders, gay military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson