Reminder to donate $5 or $10 to end the Freepathon.
Posted on 03/03/2015 4:28:01 PM PST by lowbridge
The point is that she didn’t ‘play in the sewer’. The idiots where attacking her through him. She was accepted to college and he tweeted his pleasure and pride that she was going to play college ball in RI. Jerks decided to respond with rather disturbing tweets.
Do the research I suggested (there are *many* stories,it would take some time) and see if you don't agree.
And it is not much of an extension from that to feeling that his daughter deserved what she got.
I've never mastered the art mind reading.Perhaps you can give me some pointers.
If I did, I apologize.
Yes,you did.I accept your apology and thank you for it.
But to imply that CS was threatening people over the phone is as low as the comments made by the tweeters.
I never implied that.All I said was that *somebody* who is,or once was,connected to that fiasco communicated those threats.And FYI...if you were to do the research I've suggested you'd find that one or more members of the Schilling family have been and/or are being investigated by the FBI...the SEC...and the RI Attorney General's office.
Baiting the creeps by exposing a loved one to the sewer is costly mistake for any public figure.
Wow. That was pretty small.
Reminder to donate $5 or $10 to end the Freepathon.
I've met many people who think there is some value, maybe courage or something, in the mere act of the expression of their opinion. As if having one is some sort of achievement. As if it's some reflection of honesty.
But sometimes it's equivalent to peeing on someone's cereal and, in response to their disgust, positing self-righteously, "Well! I've been known around here as being someone who is not afraid to piss on peoples' breakfasts. Why, some will note I've done it 41,000 times now." As if that in itself somehow makes their pissing special. Someone's piss might indeed be special, but pissing 41,000 times, if anything, means they just piss quite often.
Opinions in and of themselves, mine included, are, on average, especially unencumbered by a judicious self-review and backed by fact, practically mere bodily functions, at best a dime-a-dozen and at worst similar to the one you offered, including the ensuing defense.
That's just my opinion.
Rule Two: You do not tell a guy you want to have sex with his daughter.
Rule Three: You definitely do not tell a guy the details of how you want to have sex with his daughter. I will leave it at that.
“Curt Schilling Goes Full Dad Mode, Gets Revenge When His 17-Year-Old Daughter Is Bullied Online”
This headline is so poorly written it is making my head spin.
His daughter was not bullied online. Curt wrote a message about his daughter and the jerks went after Curt directly. The comments were all directed to him.
Some one at the Blaze needs to bone up on their reading comprehension.
Sounds to me as if it was a legitimate business venture that was underfunded. It looks as if the State, particularly Lincoln Chafe( a singularly detestable person n many ways) was as much to blame for the failure as Mr. Schilling. This type of venture takes several hundred million in cash and being underfunded is not a crime or even immoral.
The company had developed one console game and had moderate success marketing it with more than a million units sold. Had they done better or made different choices they may have weathered the storms and been very successful.
Mr. Schilling lost his fortune in the venture as well.
Being unsuccessful in a business venture is not a moral failing. Getting government backed financing for a failed venture is neither illegal or immoral. Even if you are a Boston Red Sox.
I have seen no allegations that Mr. Schilling threatened anyone about anything in his business venture. Perhaps there where threats, but the articles I have read have never mentioned any threats.
As for the Rode Island Legislature, I can think of few places as corrupt as Rode Island. Believing any member of that state legislature is like believing anything Obama says.
Ok. You win.
Feel better?
So can we assume that you,too,founded and ran a company which,while being investigated by Federal and State authorities,saw two individuals *carrying out* that investigation having had their families *threatened* if they continued their investigation?
If so it must be noted that you travel with a fast crowd.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.