Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator Cruz on tax reform: Abolish the IRS
1/18/2015 | johnwk

Posted on 01/18/2015 5:23:37 PM PST by JOHN W K

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: JOHN W K

and the Department of Education


21 posted on 01/18/2015 6:51:44 PM PST by RaginRak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K

the obamites have weaponized it. we’ll never get it clean again. may as well blow it up and start from scratch.


22 posted on 01/18/2015 6:52:37 PM PST by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman; All
"There is no reason the same couldn't be done on the federal level with the treasury department accountable to the tax commissioner."

Good point!

Along those lines, please consider the following. Note that the Founding States had given control of the federal Senate uniquely to state lawmakers partly so that state lawmakers could work with the Senate to kill House appropriations bills which Congress cannot justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers.

In other words, the Senate was intended to kill House bills which not only wrongly steal 10th Amendment-protected state powers, but also steal state revenues associated with those powers.

In fact, Justice John Marshall had clarified Congress’s limited power to lay taxes as follows.

“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

But I feel that the ill-conceived 17th Amendment, by giving low-information voters the power to elect federal Senators, threw down this major firewall that was intended to prevent the House from stealing state powers and associated state revenues.

I have also thought that the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) can be required to remind “forgetful” Congress when Congress makes appropriations bills that it cannot justify under its Section 8-limited powers.

Again, your suggestion about a federal tax commissioner is well taken.

23 posted on 01/18/2015 7:06:26 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K

Bttt


24 posted on 01/18/2015 7:09:19 PM PST by Cottonbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K

That makes sense. Didn’t have this before 16th Amendment.


25 posted on 01/18/2015 8:37:53 PM PST by Busko (The only thing that is certain is that nothing is certain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K

IRS with their own police force may turn on the congressman and senators who espouse such an idea...


26 posted on 01/18/2015 9:26:58 PM PST by BigEdLB (Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K

Sounds good to me....


27 posted on 01/19/2015 3:32:59 AM PST by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Enforcement of that law must by its very nature be a federal responsibility. It has to be to stop tax evaders.


It was only established to finance the civil war to begin with and lasted ten years and was repealed, brought in again in 1894 and again repealed since then it has been to support war and socialism.


28 posted on 01/19/2015 3:50:37 AM PST by ravenwolf (s letters scripture.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

It is a problem that goes back to the founding of the US.

There has never been an adequate way of funding the USG, even a very limited federal government. Constitutionally, the federals are forbidden from directly taxing the states; yet they cannot leave individual taxes up to the states to carry out, because individuals cross state borders all the time to evade federal taxation, even now. States have to go to lengths to catch people who have left the state to evade state taxes.

Yet about any direction you go with this, it works to the advantage of authoritarian-totalitarian types.

A totally federal taxation structure means “federalizing” all citizens, which has been in play since Social Security; as well as national ID cards; the weird restrictions of monitoring all financial transactions; it just gets icky, which it is.

Taking money at a higher level, such as VAT, would always be promised “instead” of income and other taxes, but the truth is that they would institute the VAT and *keep* the other taxes as well. The same with a national sales tax.

The bottom line is that taxation is a minefield, and millions of money people are employed specifically for the current system, so have a strong inertia to change.


29 posted on 01/19/2015 5:51:45 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
There has never been an adequate way of funding the USG, even a very limited federal government. It is a problem that goes back to the founding of the US.

Yes there is a way. The VERY first law signed by President Washington was the Tariff act of 1789.

Whereas it is necessary for the support of government, for the discharge of the debts of the United States, and the encouragement and protection of manufactures, that duties be laid on goods, wares and merchandise:"[1]

Free Traitors love income taxes and hate tariffs. I screw 'em. If they want to off shore production then they need to pay to play.

30 posted on 01/19/2015 5:57:54 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Yes it has gotten way out of hand and when people try to bring the federal government back to where it began people will holler anarchy.


31 posted on 01/19/2015 6:08:43 AM PST by ravenwolf (s letters scripture.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Exactly! Taxes at our water’s edge get foreigners to pay for the privilege to do business on American soil, just like a fee is required to sell one’s products at a flea market!

JWK


32 posted on 01/19/2015 6:08:57 AM PST by JOHN W K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Yes there is a way. The VERY first law signed by President Washington was the Tariff act of 1789.

The total value of U.S. imports in 2013 was $2.25 trillion. That same year U.S. non-discretionary spending alone was $2.54 trillion. So the U.S. could have placed a 100% tariff on everything imported and it still would have run a deficit of over a trillion dollars.

33 posted on 01/19/2015 6:12:52 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Cut the Federal to the bone and add a 5% NRST. Repeal the 16th. Problem solved. Income taxes are evil.


34 posted on 01/19/2015 6:16:29 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K

The only real solution to the evils of the IRS is to abolish it, and go with a national sales tax, with a maximum rate of 10%. God doesn’t ask for more than 10%, so the government should be able to live with that. THe author of this article is correct that even a ‘flat’ tax would leave the IRS with it’s abuses in place.


35 posted on 01/19/2015 6:44:13 AM PST by zeugma (The act of observing disturbs the observed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Cut the Federal to the bone and add a 5% NRST. Repeal the 16th. Problem solved. Income taxes are evil.

I'm not thrilled with the amount of income tax I pay either. But the idea that we can fund the government through tariffs is not realistic.

36 posted on 01/19/2015 6:44:37 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
God doesn’t ask for more than 10%, so the government should be able to live with that.

God doesn't have $2.8 trillion a year in non-discretionary spending.

37 posted on 01/19/2015 6:46:09 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Senator Cruz needs to add an additional paragraph of what will replace the IRS. No matter what simplification of the tax code that is made, there still must be a mechanism to fund the federal government.

All the mechanisms are in place to collect sales taxes. Whatever small remnant of the IRS would be necessary to maintain this would be what would remain.

38 posted on 01/19/2015 6:46:50 AM PST by zeugma (The act of observing disturbs the observed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
And that is what the direct apportioned tax is for . . . extinguishing a deficit by having each state's congressional delegation bring home a bill for their state to pay and apportioned share to extinguish the deficit!

JWK

39 posted on 01/19/2015 6:47:07 AM PST by JOHN W K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
Why not go with the FAIR SHARE BALANCED BUDGET AMENDMENT which would return us to our Constitution's original plan as our founders intended it to operate?

JWK

40 posted on 01/19/2015 6:49:26 AM PST by JOHN W K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson