Alissa Starzak Can Explain Much More Than Alissa Starzak

Conservative Treehouse ^ | Dec 25, 2014 | Sundance

[Ray76]

When asked to explain my belief that Obama’s presidency was a construction created from approximately 10 years of pre-thought exquisitely planned detail, many people are puzzled by my reasoning.

If you peel back the layers to the Milli Vanilli roadshow – what you will notice is the strategy of putting specific ideologies into the legal affairs offices of all the “non-political” constructs. The Pentagon office of legal counsel, for example, can handcuff the activity of the Pentagon with legal opinion in opposition to the traditional goals of the organization (See Jeh Johnson).

Likewise the CIA office of legal counsel, can have a similar impact on actual outcomes and steer policy. If you want to find out what’s more consequential than the proverbial executive ‘pen and phone’, get to understand the legal counsel who can stop any activity they desire just by writing adverse legal opinion. The legal opinion does not need to meet the criteria of professional review to block activity – indeed most of the time it would be shredded by exterior legal analysis – their goal is not legal standing per se’, the goal is policy influence.

[lee martell]

Even Milli Vanilli had more originality and integrity, well, at least eventually. People who missed the 1980’s won’t know much about them. I think they were British Subjects. Sounded like WHAM! with soul.

[Seizethecarp]

Pinging Seizethecarp’s list for conservative blog post thread on Barry’s nominee that was blocked by GOP before Christmas:

“When asked to explain my belief that Obama’s presidency was a construction created from approximately 10 years of pre-thought exquisitely planned detail, many people are puzzled by my reasoning.”

“If you want to find out what’s more consequential than the proverbial executive ‘pen and phone’, get to understand the legal counsel who can stop any activity they desire just by writing adverse legal opinion. The legal opinion does not need to meet the criteria of professional review to block activity – indeed most of the time it would be shredded by exterior legal analysis – their goal is not legal standing per se’, the goal is policy influence.

“Ms. Starzak is one example of one such position, one person committed to a cause. Her personal activity shows not only what she believes in, but also how her beliefs can dramatically impact policy implementation with legal influence. It is within the army of such like-minded ideologues now found throughout the construct of federal government, that you identify President Barack Obama’s tenure was not planned in 2006 – it was more likely road-mapped out in 1998/99.”

[jsanders2001]

Just 10?! Try entire life if his grandparents were Commies and CIA in addition to these reports (if they’re true):

http://www.rense.com/general84/brck.htm
http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2013/04/15/russian-official-obama-is-a-communist-kgb-agent/

Among others...

[Slyfox]

Actually, there were about a dozen blacks being readied for the presidency. Jesse Jackson’s son was one of them being groomed for it, until Obama got the dealio.

[LucyT]

“When asked to explain my belief that Obama’s presidency was a construction created from approximately 10 years of pre-thought exquisitely planned detail, many people are puzzled by my reasoning.”

“If you want to find out what’s more consequential than the proverbial executive ‘pen and phone’, get to understand the legal counsel who can stop any activity they desire just by writing adverse legal opinion. The legal opinion does not need to meet the criteria of professional review to block activity – indeed most of the time it would be shredded by exterior legal analysis – their goal is not legal standing per se’, the goal is policy influence.

“Ms. Starzak is one example of one such position, one person committed to a cause. Her personal activity shows not only what she believes in, but also how her beliefs can dramatically impact policy implementation with legal influence. It is within the army of such like-minded ideologues now found throughout the construct of federal government, that you identify President Barack Obama’s tenure was not planned in 2006 – it was more likely road-mapped out in 1998/99.”

[PGalt]

Fascinating…tactics/psyops. Thanks for posting.

[aragorn]

Bump for later reading

[Slings and Arrows]

Even Milli Vanilli had more originality and integrity, well, at least eventually. People who missed the 1980’s won’t know much about them. I think they were British Subjects. Sounded like WHAM! with soul.

One was French, the other German. The group was a German project. Make of that what you will.

[caveat emptor]

Slow Joe: “I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy,”

Dingy Harry: Obama "light-skinned" with "no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one"

Wham bam thank you m'am.

[Ray76]

“I ain’t in no was tired”

Democrats and their schmuck followers.

[AllAmericanGirl44]

bkmk

[smoothsailing]

More background on the origins of the scheme:

http://www.dailyinterlake.com/members/does-newspaper-column-shed-light-on-campaign-story/article_7924e4f0-0468-11e2-8da2-0019bb2963f4.html?mode=jqm

[nathanbedford]

al-Mansour had used Jarrett as the messenger to get out the word about his efforts to funnel Arab oil money to black students and minority colleges

These allegations, as the article forthrightly stipulates, are unproven but nevertheless instructive. Is illustrative of how adept the left is at getting us to fund their advancement. They invariably find ways to use Other People's Money. In this instance the article talks of Arab oil money to fund African-American students (read far left African American students) but we all know that American universities have long since found ways to tap taxpayers, taxpayer supported, taxpayer guaranteed monies to advance leftism on campus, specifically through preferred admissions programs based on race which are further funded by grants and scholarships etc..

We use our universities ostensibly to educate our youth but to a great degree we use our universities as gatekeepers. If a University with the reputation of Harvard, for example, puts its imprimatur on an individual such as it has done with such as Barack Obama and with Elizabeth Warren, it tells the world that these people are worthy, that they have been identified as the brightest of the bright, it tells the world it is okay to hire them in our business, law firms, or to incorporate them in the leadership of our political parties. Has Harvard sold out to Arab oil money? Undoubtedly. If they did not have Arab oil money was leftism so advanced on campus they would pursue the same course because they're funded by now by taxpayers? Certainly.

If you believe as I do that culture trumps politics you should be as worried as I am about the culture on campus. If we lose the battle of the University quad we cannot expect to win the war in the electoral voting booth. If we are funding our enemy, if we are paying for a culture which will defeat us in the polling booth, we have virtually no chance. This even before we try to wage top down war against a demographic tsunami which, by the way, is also being funded by the taxpayers.

[9thLife]

Guy’s mother was named “Stanley”. Anything’s possible.

[rodguy911]

Great post Lucy,all this was planned years ago and is being done incrementally and the chaos is unending.right now it occurrs approximately every two weeks.

[smoothsailing]

Well stated nb, even though I hasten to add you are singing to a charter member of the choir!

Here's hoping you had a Merry Christmas and wishing you A Most Happy New Year!!!

[DiogenesLamp]

...If a University with the reputation of Harvard, for example, puts its imprimatur on an individual such as it has done with such as Barack Obama and with Elizabeth Warren, it tells the world that these people are worthy, that they have been identified as the brightest of the bright, it tells the world it is okay to hire them in our business, law firms, or to incorporate them in the leadership of our political parties. ...

If you believe as I do that culture trumps politics you should be as worried as I am about the culture on campus. If we lose the battle of the University quad we cannot expect to win the war in the electoral voting booth. If we are funding our enemy, if we are paying for a culture which will defeat us in the polling booth, we have virtually no chance. This even before we try to wage top down war against a demographic tsunami which, by the way, is also being funded by the taxpayers.

Much wisdom in what you say. I do however have an alternative suggestion. Make Universities Obsolete, or at the very least dramatically scale back their power and influence.

Texas' effort to create a $10,000.00 degree program is an example of this. The Khan Academy is another. Technology is getting better every year, and in the past there may have been reasons why people needed to show up in person and pay ridiculous amounts of money to learn things, but we have been making progress, so I say we shove some of it up the @$$E$ of some "progressives."

We need a concerted effort in the various legislatures and elsewhere to defund these institutions by recognizing and supporting less ideological driven alternatives.

That is my best thinking on a response to these communist fifth column institutions. Starve them to death.

[Chewbarkah]

Hillary’s role in the Clinton “co-presidency” included installing and operating loyal/leftist “General Counsels” to control every department from the WH. (She had been leader of the Legal Services Corporation and had major connections to the communist-leaning National Lawyers Guild). As with HillaryCare, Obama’s handlers expanded Hillary’s model, in this case, using lawyers to control and subvert almost every government agency.