Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Horror, the horror (math and grammar in one lesson)
me | me

Posted on 10/16/2014 9:57:39 AM PDT by Doctor 2Brains

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Doctor 2Brains

In most cases of the above “Less” should be “Fewer”


21 posted on 10/16/2014 10:54:36 AM PDT by muir_redwoods ("He is a very shallow critic who cannot see an eternal rebel in the heart of a conservative." G.K .C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor 2Brains

“X times less (or fewer)” isn’t as clear as “one xth as much (or many).” But it is still a perfectly valid, if cumbersome, grammatical construction. Think of it as “more” of a “negative.” “Colder” is less heat, not more coldness. But we talk about cold As if it were a presence of something instead of its opposite’s absence. You can talk about poverty as the absence of money or the presence of penury. So a poor person could be deemed to have 10 times less money (or 10 times as much penury) as a wealthier person.

But in the strict mathematical sense, you are right. “Ten times less” is not the same as “one tenth of.” Let’s say the statement is “100 is 10 times less than 1000.” Ten times 1000 is 10000. 100 is not 1000 - 10000, so the statement is wrong. Maybe you meant 10 times 1000. But then you’re claiming that 100 = 1000 - 1000, which is still wrong.

On the other hand, to say “100 is one tenth of 1000” is clearly demonstrable. 1000 x 0.1 = 100.

The bottom line is, no editor worth his red pen would let a phrase like “ten times less” stand. And no writer worth his Underwood would use it in the first place.


22 posted on 10/16/2014 12:10:41 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

This thread is timeless.


23 posted on 10/16/2014 12:24:56 PM PDT by HardyCanuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Doctor 2Brains

x = y/10


24 posted on 10/16/2014 1:26:24 PM PDT by Undecided 2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor 2Brains

This is one of my big pet peeves as well. “It takes 10 times less energy than before.” “Ok, before it took one kilowatt, now, it’s ten times one kilowatt?” “Uh no, ...”


25 posted on 10/16/2014 5:02:22 PM PDT by jiggyboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katana
“X times as many” used in a negative sense it definitively classifies the writer as a journalism school graduate.
I, too, agree with the English professor. Although you can convince yourself that you understand the meaning, the usage is sloppy at best.

It does not help the reader as much as it should and, like writing in the passive voice, it gives the impression that the writer himself may not know what he is talking about.


26 posted on 10/16/2014 5:41:15 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ("Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Undecided 2012

Only if you write it that way. Duh. It is NOT said that way.


27 posted on 10/16/2014 5:48:49 PM PDT by Doctor 2Brains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson