Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama: ‘Unequivocally committed’ to net neutrality
Associated Press ^ | Oct 9, 2014 7:17 PM EDT

Posted on 10/09/2014 5:50:19 PM PDT by Olog-hai

President Barack Obama says he is “unequivocally committed” to keeping the Internet free and open, a concept known as “net neutrality.”

Net neutrality is the idea that Internet service providers shouldn’t block, manipulate or slow data moving across their networks.

Obama credits net neutrality with unleashing the power of the Internet. He says he doesn’t want to lose that power or “clog up the pipes.” …

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Society
KEYWORDS: censoredinternet; liberalagenda; netneutrality; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
Nope; can’t have the jihad intarwebs suffering from clogged pipes.
1 posted on 10/09/2014 5:50:19 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

If you like your net neutrality, you can keep your net neutrality, unequivocally. - Barry Soetoro.


2 posted on 10/09/2014 5:54:01 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Got Ebola? Come to America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
OBOLA sez he's 100 % committed to a free and open internet - translation: He'll do whatever he can with his pen and phone to shut it down.
3 posted on 10/09/2014 5:54:09 PM PDT by atc23 (The Confederacy was the single greatest conservative resistance to federal authority ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Just another brand of redistribution.


4 posted on 10/09/2014 5:54:20 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The man who damns money obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it earned it." --Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I called Obama a slow learner in his first year in office and he’s done nothing to lose that label.

He’s had the world handed to him and knows absolutely nothing about political capital, proportionality, timing, etc.

He and his pie-in-the-sky speechwriters deal exclusively in superlatives: the best, the worst, the fastest, the most efficient, the most historic, etc. etc.

If they believe it they are fools. If they expect others to believe it then they know nothing about salesmanship since all the hype becomes an unintelligible din.

By now, even his most ardent supporters must recognize that any ‘reform’ he proposes is simply more government control by another name. The Net is ALREADY neutral. Getting a corrupt FCC involved would spell practical disaster.


5 posted on 10/09/2014 5:56:49 PM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Yeah whatever. Net “neutrality”, as espoused by the communist class (i.e. Democrats), means something entirely different than any sensible person would think.


6 posted on 10/09/2014 5:57:53 PM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Well, then he is stupid and doesnot understand the issue. How about he worries about archiving Federal emails first.


7 posted on 10/09/2014 5:58:16 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Kerry, as Obama's plenipotentiary, is a paradox - the physical presence of a geopolitical absence")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

When I read it. I read it like President Obama was for Net Neutrality. Thank God he is not. I cannot believe anybody would be for this disaster in the making. If this ever goes through.....anyone who votes for it I will personally try to get rid of them politically. This could be the worst thing ever to happen to the United States of America.


8 posted on 10/09/2014 5:58:19 PM PDT by napscoordinator (I guarantee every FRiend Misses the lost opportunity of a President Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Net neutrality is the idea that Internet service providers shouldn’t block, manipulate or slow data moving across their networks.

Makes no mention of government doing the same.

9 posted on 10/09/2014 5:58:55 PM PDT by Mygirlsmom (Obama Legacy: Bush's fault. Next guy's problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Once again hussein comes out as anti-business and in opposition to liberty. All I need to know is the wrong people support this “net neutrality” thing. If hussein is for it, I’m against it. Abolish the FCC! Get the government out of my internet! Allow free enterprise to run it!


10 posted on 10/09/2014 6:00:40 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Okay. That seals it. I am manifestly against it.


11 posted on 10/09/2014 6:01:56 PM PDT by rlmorel (The Media's Principles: Conflict must exist. Doesn't exist? Create it. Exists? Exacerbate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

A way to shut up Conservatives ....


12 posted on 10/09/2014 6:03:00 PM PDT by SkyDancer (I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

He’s lying. He’ll lie about it right up until the time they’re ready to spring their trap.


13 posted on 10/09/2014 6:03:18 PM PDT by Bullish (You ever notice that liberalism really just amounts to anti-morality?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Why would conservatives support “net neutrality”? It’s a communistic concept.


14 posted on 10/09/2014 6:04:50 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Of course he is. Just because the AP is spinning his words does not mean the AP is being truthful.


15 posted on 10/09/2014 6:05:52 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: relictele

Obama is an ideologue, not a slow learner. His agenda comes first and reality be damned.


16 posted on 10/09/2014 6:06:57 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
A way to shut up Conservatives

Spot on! As proof, hussein allows CAIR and Al-Jazerra to spew their seditious, antisemitic filth all over the WWW. This move by the regime is the first step toward banning Free Republic.

17 posted on 10/09/2014 6:06:59 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex

Yeah, it’s hateful to speak against islam ....


18 posted on 10/09/2014 6:08:35 PM PDT by SkyDancer (I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

This is one issue that I hope he is being direct. I know he lies but this issue is more important than anything he has had to deal with. I hope the Republicans are ready to fight this to their deaths.


19 posted on 10/09/2014 6:09:38 PM PDT by napscoordinator (I guarantee every FRiend Misses the lost opportunity of a President Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Clinging Bitterly

That’s right. In its former iteration, it was nothing more or less than an attempt to forcibly bring the quantity of liberal propaganda up to the level of conservative truth.


20 posted on 10/09/2014 6:09:46 PM PDT by Migraine (Diversity is great -- until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson