Dr Naila Rabbani, University of Warwick. Credit: University of Warwick
Posted on 09/03/2014 12:09:14 PM PDT by Red Badger
Dr Naila Rabbani, University of Warwick. Credit: University of Warwick
It would’ve been helpful if the writer had identified a few of the more popular dietary sources of MG.
sugar, alcohol, and simple carbs/starches, I would think.
“It would’ve been helpful if the writer had identified a few of the more popular dietary sources of MG.”
Exactly. So I’ll know what to quit eating THIS week.
But here's a dilemma, high levels of GM also appear to fight cancer.
http://cancerfightingstrategies.com/methylglyoxal-and-cancer.html#sthash.C0CyBYwi.dpbs
Food, in other words.
However it is noted in the Wiki for Manuka honey that the methylglyoxal can be neutralized, while like some other honeys, it retains its antibacterial properties.
That is, several raw honeys have been found to almost randomly have profound antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties, so much so that for example, it would be the “ideal toothpaste” against gum disease. Pasteurization destroys the effect, however.
But this particular honey, mostly found in New Zealand, also contains this methylglyoxal, and its profoundly bad side effects.
Processed crappy food, yes.
Nothing cheaper than 10$ a flagon.
+1
“Low levels of HDL, High Density Lipoprotein, are closely linked to heart disease”
Actually, the cholesterol theory of heart disease is nearly dead.
1. Many of the foods that raise the good cholesterol levels also raise my blood glucose level.
2. My doctor has moderated his views on bread. First, it was no bread whatsoever, now whole wheat is ok. I opt for the 21 grain bread sold at Sprouts.
3. If one thing doesn't get me, another will. Accordingly, I monitor what I eat, exercise regularly, and enjoy each day as much as I can.
4. I also resolve not to drink a bottle (plus) of wine the day before I go in for my blood work. I did that two months ago, and came up anemic...and I've never been anemic. lol Was the wine good? Absolutely!
Agree. Interesting article, nevertheless.
Assumptions built upon assumptions isn’t that the same scientific assumptions bandied about as fact by the warmers?
I have come to the realization that if you instantly believe any “study” that makes the MSM, you might be a redneck.
I think the cholesterol panic is just a bunch if hooey they in e ted to sell expensive drugs
You need a certain amount of it-hell maybe some people need more than others because everyone is different
I believe in some people it won’t go down to an ideal level no matter what they do because their bodies are genetically wired to produce more
“Low levels of HDL, High Density Lipoprotein, are closely linked to heart disease”
Actually, the cholesterol theory of heart disease is nearly dead.
These two statements aren't in conflict. Yes, total cholesterol levels or consumption are not linked to heart disease. That's been known for a very long time, regardless of what people have been told.
But low levels of HDL is in fact a strong predictor of heart disease, as is high levels of triglycerides.
Like what foods? I don't believe this is generally the case.
“There are currently no drugs that can reverse low levels of HDL”
I never said that. You must have me confused with another poster.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.