Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barneys (NYC) agrees to pay $525G to settle racial profiling allegations after civil rights review
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS ^ | August 11, 2014 | BY Greg B. Smith

Posted on 08/11/2014 8:15:46 PM PDT by dennisw

In addition to paying fines and legal expenses in relation to the profiling allegations, the upscale retailer will hire an 'anti-profiling consultant' for two years, update its detention policy and improve training of security and sales personnel.

Barneys has agreed to pay $525,000 to settle allegations that the upscale retailer deliberately targeted minorities entering its Madison Ave. flagship store.

State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s investigators heard from customers and former employees that a pattern of racial profiling began last year when the high-end store tried to crack down on a dramatic spike in shoplifting and credit card fraud.

Complainants told Schneiderman’s civil rights division that the store’s security team — known as the “loss prevention unit” — made a habit of keeping watch over black and Hispanic shoppers in disproportionate numbers.

“This agreement will correct a number of wrongs,” said Schneiderman, “both by fixing past policies and by monitoring the actions of Barneys and its employees to make sure that past mistakes are not repeated.”

In a 27-page settlement document signed by both parties Friday, Schneiderman released a series of findings from a nine-month review based on interviews with nearly a dozen complainants in the so-called shop-and-frisk case, including shoppers and former employees.

They alleged that black and Hispanic customers were unfairly targeted when they entered the pricey store at 660 Madison Ave.

The store’s own data showed that from October 2012 through October 2013, black and Hispanic shoppers were detained “at rates far greater than their percentage of the store’s customer base.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 08/11/2014 8:15:46 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw

theyre going to somehow manage to FIX the rate at which hoodlums shoplift??


2 posted on 08/11/2014 8:21:40 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

“Complainants told Schneiderman’s civil rights division that the store’s security team — known as the “loss prevention unit” — made a habit of keeping watch over black and Hispanic shoppers in disproportionate numbers.”

Disproportionate based on what? The number of blacks and “hispanics” in jail for shoplifting?


3 posted on 08/11/2014 8:22:04 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
black and Hispanic shoppers were detained “at rates far greater than their percentage of the store’s customer base.”

Hmm. Wonder if they were shoplifting at rates far greater than their percentage of the store’s customer base?

4 posted on 08/11/2014 8:22:29 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

Note...no mention whether their losses dropped....LOL


5 posted on 08/11/2014 8:25:15 PM PDT by Crim (Palin / West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

The Amish know that with Holder heading the DOJ they are apt to get away with any lawsuit targeting businesses or institutions in general. After all, Holder is picky when he decides what groups to prosecute.


6 posted on 08/11/2014 8:25:29 PM PDT by Rembrandt (Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Could there possibly be a REASON why certain shoppers needed to be “racially profiled?”


7 posted on 08/11/2014 8:26:39 PM PDT by Bon of Babble (Given enough coffee...I could rule the world!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Shakedown, breakdown, takedown
Everybody wants into the crowded line
Breakdown, takedown, you’re busted
—Bob Seger


8 posted on 08/11/2014 8:27:07 PM PDT by denydenydeny ("World History is not full of good governments, or of good voters either "--P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Watch their “shrinkage” rate skyrocket.


9 posted on 08/11/2014 8:28:11 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Rat Party policy;Lie,deny,refuse to comply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Reminds me of a suit a few years ago against a major drug store chain. They were sued for “profiling” and discrimination because they kept there jerry curl under lock and key and you needed a clerk to bring it up to the register for you. They did this because every month, they would lose at least half the product to shoplifting. Now I am going to go out on a limb here, but there is only a certain “community” that uses the jerry curl product.


10 posted on 08/11/2014 8:38:32 PM PDT by TheCipher (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself- Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheCipher

there = “their”


11 posted on 08/11/2014 8:39:06 PM PDT by TheCipher (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself- Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
The store’s own data showed that from October 2012 through October 2013, black and Hispanic shoppers were detained “at rates far greater than their percentage of the store’s customer base.”

Well, what about the percentage of those committing the crimes?

Sometimes racial profiling is based on logic and statistical evidence. It doesn't typically happen in a vacuum.

12 posted on 08/11/2014 8:46:46 PM PDT by sargon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Who knew Civil Rights laws included the right for non-Whites to commit crimes with impunity ?


13 posted on 08/11/2014 9:06:19 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
I think Macy's in Manhattan got shaken down in the same way about a year ago. Now they simply allow the Norwegians to walk out the door with the goods.

Same will happen with Barneys. Eventually either retail prices will skyrocket or the ‘going out of business’ sign will be in the window.

14 posted on 08/11/2014 10:23:26 PM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheCipher

Reminds me of a suit a few years ago against a major drug store chain. They were sued for “profiling” and discrimination because they kept there jerry curl under lock and key and you needed a clerk to bring it up to the register for you. They did this because every month, they would lose at least half the product to shoplifting. Now I am going to go out on a limb here, but there is only a certain “community” that uses the jerry curl product.”

Here is a solution for that situation: Don’t stock jerry curl (whatever that is) and all items attractive to a “certain community”. I would bet that would help in many more ways than the obvious.


15 posted on 08/12/2014 3:38:19 AM PDT by VMI70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson