Posted on 04/21/2014 1:08:36 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
“In the beginning, there was Nothing. And it exploded.”
I doubt it too.....would a hot blonde like that really hang out with those dweebs.
I don’t see why scientists were dismayed; they ought to be overjoyed. I remember how they howled that the Big Bang could not possibly be correct after it was pointed out that the Big Bang actually lent a huge amount of credibility to Creationism. Of course, they have not found anything to replace it that makes a lick of sense, but they still opposed their pet theory after that epiphany.
The big bang theory insists that during the big bang, all matter and even light itself ignored the fundamental laws of physics and cast itself across tens of billions of light years in a trillionth of a trillionth of a second.
Sounds more like a God-created universe to me.
The majority of Americans voted for the Obamadork.
‘Nuff said.
Most of America thinks it is a TV show.
There was no Big Bang. There is no inflation.
The Universe recycles and the Universe is constantly in motion. Both expanding and contraction, twisting and bending.
The modern theories will catch up with this as more evidence is found.
how did they get young Gene Wilder?
Take a look at Hebrews 11:3. Could that describe what we call the “big bang”???
Only because she is a mooch who is looking for a free meal.
RE: Of course, they have not found anything to replace it that makes a lick of sense, but they still opposed their pet theory after that epiphany.
Well, there is an alternative ( but not very popular view ) called Plasma Cosmology.
Plasma cosmology is a non-standard cosmology whose central postulate is that the dynamics of ionized gases and plasmas play important if not dominant roles in the physics of the universe beyond the Solar System.
Some general concepts about plasma cosmology have been attributed to Hannes Alfvén, who was awarded the 1970 Nobel prize for inventing magnetohydrodynamics (MHD).
Alfvén proposed the use of plasma scaling to extrapolate the results of laboratory experiments and space plasma physics observations and scale them over many orders-of-magnitude up to the largest observable objects in the universe.
Plasma cosmology is rejected by astrophysicists and cosmologists because, as described by its proponents, it does not provide as well-matched an account of the observations of astrophysical and cosmological phenomena as the accepted astrophysical and cosmological theories do.
I believe it was more like a balloon rapidly inflating and expanding rather than an exploding.
To think of the universe as always being here, always existing, would be just as incredible IMO.
It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in …Thus far only red shift has been detected, which indicates expansion. If any contraction of the universe were happening, we would detect blue shift.
— Isaiah 40:22
No. Per Big Bang theory, the universe was about the size of a grain of sand or less than a millimeter in diameter at the end of the inflationary period.
RSR’s List of Evidence Against the Big Bang
http://kgov.s3.amazonaws.com/bel/2014/20140321-BEL058.mp3
Scientists had a “consensus” that the universe was eternal, until red shift proved it was expanding.
Most Americans can’t do basic Algebra or describe a single law of Thermodynamics.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.