Hawkins is not the guru people make out. Like Billy Nye the Anus Guy.
perhaps we can send a few hundred corrupted politico-leeches from WashDC to the nearest black hole to find out for sure if this theory is correct? starting with...
Going to a lot of trouble to explain there is nothing to explain . . . beep?
Still Hawking has a point. A black hole is a gravitional center so strong that once something enters,then nothing not even light can escape. Never understood what the source of a such a gravitational field could be and since there is inherent energy associated with mass what happens to all that energy when mass is absorbed by a “black hole”.
So bascially there is either something wrong with Hawking’s theory or there is something wrong with Einstein’s. If the “firewall” exists then general relativity is partially wrong. If it doesn’t, then the idea of Hawking radiation is partially wrong. Either way, I don’t see how entangled particles on either side of an event horizon violates the entanglement.
Hawking has always been overrated. “Einstein’s heir” my ass. And an anti-Semite to boot.
I love scientists and their “laws.”
Mother nature laughs at science.
Fascinating stuff.
I thought that the science was settled. Deniers!
Hawking touts no time existed before the big bang, so therefore no creator exists.
...and therefore all who believe in God are dellusional.
Thanks Steven, you’re a true believer in the church of atheism and yourself (redundant, I know). Closing the door on possibility in an infinite universe.
Bitter much.
Stephen Hawking and a handful of other theorists exist at a
level that not even one person in a million can grasp. None of them are “the smartest person in the world” and none of them make such a claim. That is the hype of people who are
unable to grasp the subject matter these people deal with so
they devolve the issue into the realm of a “cult of personality”. There is simply not more than a dozen or more
people who have the intellect and knowledge of the subject
to accurately discuss whether or not Stephen Hawkings theories are right, wrong or somewhere in between. And these theorists will tell you that EVERYTHING they postulate is based on information currently available and
that theories change and evolve as data becomes available.
The Hubble Space Telescope did more for cosmology than all
the theorists ever alive....because hard data proves or disproves theory.
never believed anything he says, sorry about his physical condition, but he is just weird. Figured he was the puppet of someone else. They could say anything and say it is him speaking...
PBS stations are running a new hour-long program this week on Hawking’s life and work - spent a good portion of it on his investigations into the nature of time and his popular book “A Brief History of Time” (which his editor said was a mess in its first draft form) - as explained on the program, his “No God” stance comes from his belief in the Big Bang origins of the universe and that before that event there was nothing else in existence, hence no original creator. But his description of the Big Bang is that in fact it was an explosion of a black hole, which he defines in general as resulting from the collapse of a gigantic star - so if generally we need gigantic stars to collapse to get a black hole, how can we get a big bang from an exploding black hole which had no antecedent causation - i.e. I came away from the program thinking Hawking was a bit of a hustler.....
I love black holes
Imagine matter so dense a teaspoon of it on earth would weigh more than a supertanker full of crude
No wonder it sucks in and compresses everything around it into its own mass
Space
I dig it man....pass that bong hoss
Gotta give Hawking credit....the little worm lives for poontang
God love him (even as Hawking denys HIM)
BRING IT: Stephen Hawking Says Higgs Boson Research Could Destroy The Universe
http://geekologie.com/2014/09/bring-it-stephen-hawking-says-higgs-boso.php