Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 12th_Monkey

Oh, crap. I heard they were redoing it. But Neil DeGrasse Tyson is an arrogant, hateful, bigoted know-nothing.


2 posted on 01/13/2014 10:40:24 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dangus; SunkenCiv

Like there's a lot of competition.

5 posted on 01/13/2014 10:43:10 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dangus

Really? I’ve heard him a couple of different times on science programs and never got that impression.

IMHO, I thought he does a good job relating science to folks that know little about the subject.


6 posted on 01/13/2014 10:44:03 AM PST by 12th_Monkey (In an alternate universe Obama still dips ice cream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dangus
But Neil DeGrasse Tyson is an arrogant, hateful, bigoted know-nothing.
And an atheist like Carl Sagan, although Tyson doesn't have the guts to come out of the closet.
8 posted on 01/13/2014 10:48:15 AM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dangus
But Neil DeGrasse Tyson is an arrogant, hateful, bigoted know-nothing.

I'm happy to see that I'm not the only who can't stand that smarmy bastid.

13 posted on 01/13/2014 10:54:36 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts ("The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dangus

Bwahahahahaha ... faint praise? or feint praise?


19 posted on 01/13/2014 11:03:37 AM PST by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dangus

To be fair, I don’t think Tyson is particularly bigoted, hateful, or a know nothing. He’s a smart man, and can communicate his ideas in a very accessible way.

He does come across as a bit arrogant, yes.

His biggest failing is that he sucks all the air out of the room when he is part of a panel. Just a blabbermouth. An entertaining one, but it does short-change everybody else on the panel. I’ve seen it several times.

But he’s usually the draw so promoters seem to let it slide. Just look at any panel discussion he is on and he runs out in front of everybody else, hitting his laugh lines, and entertaining the crowd.

I have a feeling he’s an engaging person, but one that just talks too much.


34 posted on 01/13/2014 11:28:15 AM PST by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dangus
Is this part of 0'ButtPlug's Outreach to Muslims In Space Program..
think of the Muppet's Pigs in Space, which was humorous.
This program shall not be, very little science/astronomy..count on it

48 posted on 01/13/2014 11:46:06 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dangus
I heard they were redoing it. But Neil DeGrasse Tyson is an arrogant, hateful, bigoted know-nothing.

Though he's a Brit, Prof. Brian Cox (from the BBC series "Wonders of the Solar System") should be doing this.

60 posted on 01/13/2014 12:07:08 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Do The Math)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dangus

Ditto! They screwed up the remake of Wild Wild West by putting an Amish guy in the lead and now this?


65 posted on 01/13/2014 12:44:42 PM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dangus

Agreed. Not sure at all if I’ll like Tyson’s version. But, if I can tolerate Morgan Freeman, who’s an even bigger racist, then I can probably watch this.


70 posted on 01/13/2014 12:55:20 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dangus

This thing was worse than my worst fears. Just awful. They had no voice, no message, no audience in mind. It does not rise to the level of hokey. An embarrassment, and worse, a wasted opportunity.

Carl Sagan was a good scientist and a great salesman. His vision, his message drove the original Cosmos. Dr. Tyson probably did as well as could be expected given the material, but he is very much a lesser epigone of Sagan. Great special effects and computer graphics in the service of a muddled and confused message. The fancy-schmatzy computer graphics added to the confusion and detracted from whatever message they thought they had. The cheesy “Also Sprach Zarathustra” Musik didn’t help, either. If you watched the first episode you know less about the cosmos than before.

Four rotten tomatoes. In case I wasn’t clear, I HATED IT.


102 posted on 03/10/2014 4:19:51 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (In the long run, we are all dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson